That's why it's so easy to make money off guilible young angry white males with low IQs. They don't need facts to be fooled
But did you enjoy it? Let's see, Bush contiues to read a book with kids when notified. Bush gets the Bin Laden family out of the US safely. Bush invades Iraq in the name of terror yet there are no real terror connections as it would appear. (or was it WMD's?) Bush allows Iran and NK to make Nukes. Bush can't catch OBL. Afganastan is being taken over by the Taliban again under Bush. Bush won't force Pakistan to give up the guy that gave the nuke receipes to Iran and NK. Bush won't force Pakistan to let us go in and get OBL. Bush says in 5 years since 9/11 we are safer. However, the average between major attacks is 7 to 10 years. So that so called fact is still to be realized. Heroin production is up like no other time in histroy under Bush from the Far East. There are alot of questions about this administration regarding terror that I would like answered.
It is true, for some, "only the message" matters. Statements, cloaked in the disguise of pretending to ask a question. Yeah, right
GTech only calls peeps guilible young angry white males with low IQs And he also believes that the original 9/11 story is all facts, when there are many many questions unanswered, the 9/11 commision report was a whitewash.
Forget the thermite, missiles, controlled demolitions, exercises going on the very same day as the real attacks etc mate the real giveaway is this one. America under attack, nobody knows what is going on, the most powerful man in the world is at a school and what does he do? Reamains in the classroom. No matter how you try and spin this it's the real smoking gun: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-11secretservice.html Bush knew.
Real, huh? So you admit you are guilible? I can work with that. Remains in the classroom? You wouldn't be trying to lie, would you? Moonbats often cite this as an example of poor leadership. Quite the contrary, it's exactly the kind of leadership needed. You see, instead of upsetting school children and creating a state of panic that would stay with them for the rest of their lives, he reamined calm, cool and collected until the story was through, then excused himself. Impressive! Wait, did you say that was "a smoking gun?" Are you really serious? You're going to make it *that* easy for me? LMAO! I wish there was a way to convey the sheer laughter behind the screen
LMFAO America under attack. 270 million people in danger. Nobody knows whether there are more attacks planned. The leader remains sat in a classroom telling a story about a pet goat for christs sake. Dude, do you really think 20 or 30 school kids are going to be upset if he excuses himself? So your idea of leadership is this: Continue to remain in a classrom for 10 minutes after your Chief of Staff has told you that America is under attack. And you call me stupid? Come on you are talking nonsense, so he would say "Gotta go kids there is a terrorist attack going on" ??? Of cousrse he wouldn't, he would just excuse himself (or the teacher would do it for him.)
Yes, quite simply, I do think you are stupid. But, I'm not insensitive either. I know you can't help it
So, what we got here is AGS (no longer able to debate facts of the attack for which he has TONS and TONs of problems with); he is reduced to complaining about what bush should have done (or he would have done in his position). Interesting.
Actually, AGS, the President gave orders to his advisor/secretary dude to pass on to the rest of his cabinet until he could excuse himself. He didn't wait 10 minutes
It's logical and summed up in that article: That is what should of happened, the look on the face of Bush when Card whispered into his ear was not unlike he was telling him his wife had locked her keys in her car. He should have been removed immediately no if's or but's.
Guy, he is the President of the United States of America. Nobody knew if there were more attacks coming at the time, he needed moving. Whether he told the cabinet is irrelivant, he is the single most important person in the USA and should be protected as such. In a school 4 miles away from an airport whilst the country is under attack where it was publicized where he would be is not ideally secure, is it? You cannot win this particular arguement and I expect you will resort to the old mantra of calling me stupid LOL. Anyway, I have made a point, I will not get into any more debate as it just goes around and around in circles. Debate is good but this is an un-winnable debate for both sides I fear. I pray to God for all the lives lost and I hope and pray that nothing like 9/11 ever happens again.
Ultimately, I don't see how "moving" would have helped the situation of the world any. Maybe if he did jumping jacks, or dance moves, that "moving" would have totally helped the situation. Whether he moved or not, as long as commands to handle a situation get through to ground zero, what does it matter? Personally, if I could either: A) Cause panic by leaving right away B) Stay calm, act as nothing has happened I would choose B. Then, I get these choices: A) Ignore the situation B) Send orders to my advisor/secretary guy that told me about the attacks to get response started (which certainly doesn't take less than 5 minutes) C) Fire my advisor for telling me about my own conspiracy If I had chosen A, my choices would be: A) Say nothing has happened and that panic is for no reason because 9/11 "never happened", and there IS no threat B) Say nothing to boost my popularity rankings C) Run out screaming like a coward like Clinton would do and say "It can't be happening! It can't be happening!" Lol, now which seems logical to you?
That covers one point that is still debatable IMO. Nine more to go folks. 2) Bush gets the Bin Laden family out of the US safely. Why? All other air traffic is grounded and they got special clearance IIRC.