We're supporting the deaths of quite a few innocent women and children. Some findings from the Oxford Research Group: http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/0719-01.htm
gworld, I have every reason to believe you think my posts are idiotic. I had no preconceived notion you would think otherwise. If you go back and read my posts, I back up my assertions with sources. You may not like the sources, you may not appreciate those sources being revealed, but I believe it is important to look at the motivating and driving factors that represent problems, rather than pretend they don't exist or hunting down some moral equivalence to relate them to. There are some that simply just don't get it. Then there are some that know, but pretend not to. Right? As I said in another post, at another time, I've never seen anyone "claim" to not believe in God (perhaps you call yours by a different name?) so adamantly opposed to Israel and Jews in general. There is great line between hatred and being aware. It is acceptable to be aware of what is going on. It is acceptable to back up things that are going on with references that support them. The acts, in the references (links) I post are the hatred. Being aware of them, discussing them and recognizing them is not hatred. There is a difference. To suggest these things happen because of poverty, or put them off on oil or other such nonsense is just that. It's nonsense. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1552099,00.html A brand new Mercedes? http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20050714-090938-7384r This is a religious ideology. The scriptures are there. They are used to incite hatred. You may not wish it to be revealed, but it is true. Let us not cast our visions and illusions to a blind eye. There are countries througout the world that endure poverty and are not muslim dominant. Yet we do not see other religions conducting these attrocities on a daily basis. We do not see Christians in Thailand decapitating muslims, but we see the opposite. We do not see Christians and Jews committing genocide in Darfur, but the opposite. If it's about poverty, then why are other religions not taking these measures. Perhaps because there is a difference in the religious ideologies? Maybe? Could be? OKC Bombing - http://www.jaynadavis.com Let's not be too quick to dismiss the islamic connection behind the tragedy.
While we're discussing, Iran's bought and is buying material for making the nuclear bomb. 300 units of nickel 63 aquired with codename "Parto Namaje Tolua" This radioactive material sends electrons and is used in atom bomb fuzes. However the isotope portion (15mCi), requested by Teheran, - it requires a transport in particularly protected containers - is much too high - as to be used for other purposes than the nuclear bomb. Strange is also, under which secrecy the business was completed. The second business concerns so-called tritium target. They are used in neutron sources, with which the nuclear chain reaction in atom bombs can be released. Such targets belong to the so-called dual Use products, which fulfill civilian like weapon-technology functions.
I would have way too many things to say that I won't say anything here, I'll let some facts, just a quick article, speak for me: Murder in the name of Allah
Thank you, it's mindboggling to me how anyone can accuse someone of racism for trying to examine the underlying issues and motivations leading to those attacks.
Sorry, I'm back already! have a look @ this and @ gworld, it would take me seconds to find pictures of a bunch of islamic murderers (New York, Madrid, London, Sharm, how long did it take you to find 3 Americans? I beg your pardon, only 2 actually... and read this: The word 'terrorism' entered into European languages in the wake of the French revolution of 1789. In the early revolutionary years, it was largely by violence that governments in Paris tried to impose their radical new order on a reluctant citizenry. As a result, the first meaning of the word 'terrorism', as recorded by the Académie Française in 1798, was 'system or rule of terror'. So it was invented by the French?!?!
I am thankful for the job our government is doing. It is easy to sit back, chill out and critizice the work of others.
You do not care about how many woman and children who are accidently killed. In a country that had nothing to do with 911. Is that what you tell your kids? Its ok to kill innocent non-white people, because some other non-white people killed some of our people first.
Its also easy to sit back, not know much wave a flag and be a shill until I questioned you guys , you guys didn't even seem to know what Ladens supposed reasons fro attacking us.
I really dont give a flying F*** what his reason for attacking us was. I want him and everyone who supports him at room temperature asap.
Hahaha, but so true. The Talibans must kill themselves if they see any naked woman except their wifes. What about the Taliban Women to walk around in their neighborhood tomorrow morning - naked of course...that would solve a lot of problems...
You do realize we are at war, right? Did you forget that? What the hell is a "non-white" person? Are we playing the race card again? No, I tell my kid it is ok to defend freedom against terrorists. They come in many different flavors. "Non-White", you are hillarious. Muslim is not a race my friend. It is no more a "race" than being an "American". Iraq had everything to do with the motivation and support of terror, which includes 9/11. We are at war, remember? A lot of people seem to forget that.
It amazes me how this supposed religion can spout such high moral melodrama as to suggest not looking at any other naked women than your own wife, yet treats their own wives like complete and utter shit, then in the same breath condones killing those of other faiths. Something tells me the flip flop nature of the crayon (spelling) ought to make a nice hand book for the DNC. (flame on)