Latest from today... Iran has restarted a nuclear facility for uranium conversion, saying the process is for producing nuclear fuel. Iranian president uses new negotiator The former iranian negotiator Ali Larijani replaces Hassan Rohani than chief negotiators in the atomic negotiations. Larijani is considered as ultra conservative and trusted friend of the religious head Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Iranian side announced to take up the work in the atomic plant Isfahan today again, that's what they did so far.
Gtech, you might want to just post one sentence at a time, he doesn't seem to read more than just 1 sentence. I think that is why he sounds so confused when he responds, especially when he starts rambling about racism, hatred, etc, because he didn't read, he just assumes we believe a certain way and runs with it.
Debunked, could be. It may be a form of reading comprehension problem that I had not accounted for. I was also going to have him go back and find any link he believes is from a hate group. I know he can't but thought it might quell his recent attempts to defend by saying we all post from hate group links, etc.
I guess that depends on how you define a hate group. Some really believe that FoxNews is a hate group. My guess is anything or anyone that has a differing opinion is both part of a hate group, and will always be wrong in his eyes.
300 units of nickel 63 aquired with codename "Parto Namaje Tolua" This radioactive material sends electrons and is used in atom bomb fuzes. However the isotope portion (15mCi), requested by Teheran, - it requires a transport in particularly protected containers - is much too high - as to be used for other purposes than the nuclear bomb. Strange is also, under which secrecy the business was completed. The second business concerns so-called tritium target. They are used in neutron sources, with which the nuclear chain reaction in atom bombs can be released. Such targets belong to the so-called dual Use products, which fulfill civilian like weapon-technology functions. All was aquired from France via a south Korean company as a match maker... together with this... Furthermore as of yesterday, Irans new president is seeking closer ties with Syria to create a defence alliance. Great, isn't it?
Thank you mia for the link, I have looked at that web site. To establish a frame work for this discussion, I would like you to answer the following questions: Do you know that web site is just a re-worded text from a book called The Moon-god Allah in the archeology of the middle east by Robert Morey that uses Professor Coon archaeological digging as it's source for drawing it's conclusions? If you know this, do you accept the above book is your authoritative source for your claims about moon god? Thank you.
Gworld one question Do you know how rats bite? Of course you do... Rats bite only while one is asleep, when they bite they blow at same time cool air into the wound so that one doesn't feel the pain at first, but when one wakes up again its to late. Are you trying to put us asleep?
Gtech shouts from roof tops and ring the bells, danger, danger, close the gates, Intelligent people are here, they want to discuss and ask for proof. "To discuss and ask for proof, are the acts of devil and proves that you are Muslim and terrorist" Infinite wisdom by Gtech
I think we can all agree I would never call you intelligent Mount your defense gworld, no one has any less expectation of you. We know what you defend and we know what you attack, exclusively.
1. There were numerous links on the subject. 2. Not everything on the internet is the Gods honest truth. 3. I'm not sure that posting a link to a source on the internet is a good way to prove anything. But you did ask for it. 4. I just picked the first result because it was first. No other reason. Do I accept the book as a good source? Is that what you are asking? If so, I guess I would have to say yes until proven otherwise. I've not found anything on the subject that says otherwise. In the end since all this stuff is silly, made up and not true according to you, ie., there is no God, no Allah, the Bible and Quran are both old and outdated and make no sense, so what difference does it really make. Who cares right? Why do you seek to take a side on an issue you do no believe in in the first place? I'm just a little bit confused on that one.
If you bored to see my profile you would quickly come to the conclusion that I have already presented myself to the forum and have participated in other discussions in a non-trollish way. Anyway, threads with "God Inside TM" always go hand in hand with hate, ignorance and wishful thinking. I recognize my mistake for taking a part on this thread so this is my last message regarding religion here. Looking forward to ear from you guys in other sections of the forum
Is this a confession that you and Gtech have no idea what you are talking about when you mention Allah moon God and you are simply repeating like a parrot what you have read on some bible web site some where without knowing if there is any scientific proof for such assumption or if is it based on any kind of facts? The history does not exist in vacuum, in order to understand present time, we have to study the past and learn how we ended up where we are today. That is the reason the study of Bible, Koran, Jesus, Mohammad or Hitler is important. It does not mean I have to agree with any of it.
No it is just re-iterating your point that you do not know what you are talking about. Make sense? No one asked you to agree with anything. You stated serveral times that you do not believe in anything, ie., Jesus, Quarn, the Bible (though you do believe in Hitler). You also have gone out of your way to poke fun at Jesus, Jews, Christians and the Bible, and have constantly and consitently made fun of anyone who does believe in them. If that is the case, why on earth would you suggest for one moment that any of us (yourself included) look to any of these things which you do not believe in to learn? Why would I look to something that does not exist to learn? You do not make any sense. I think you are right on one thing though. The thread has come to an end. You have brought nothing new to it. Thank you for the effort though.
I did not say that Christianity does not exist since that would have been as stupid as Gtech and yours posting. I did say that there is no historical proof that a person named Jesus as referred in Bible ever existed and so far you could not provide any reference that this is not the case. Some of you has mentioned like a parrot that Allah is moon God and what I am asking if you have any arguments to back up this claim?
http://sixthcolumn.blogspot.com/2005/06/what-is-kitman.html Did anyone expect anything less? gworld, why do you defend something you say you don't believe in? I note you needed no such "scientific proof" when attempting to convince us that "unbelievers" are only athiests. We still see what you defend and what you attack.