What can you suggest to stop terror?

since you didn't like wikipedia, this is from encyclopedia britannica

(Arabic: “God”), the one and only God in the religion of Islam. Etymologically, the name Allah is probably a contraction of the Arabic al-Ilah, “the God.” The name's origin can be traced back to the earliest Semitic writings in which the word for god was Il or El, the latter being an Old Testament synonym for Yahweh. Allah is the standard Arabic word for “God” and is used by Arab Christians…

Brittannica online

It seems everybody is out to get you, wikipedia, Britannica,... How is the weather in your under ground bunker?

I looked at your link but I don't understand what is your point, it is a discussion about different from of tax for Muslims and Non-Muslims and it's root. What are you trying to say or you have no point and just liked to provide a link to make your posting sound like intelligent.

In regard to enlightenment, I am all for it and if you can teach me something that I didn't know, I would be the first to admit it the same as a while back I mixed up the name of 2 persons and when mia mention it, I gladly admitted my mistake. please, please enlighten me, I am always thankful to any one that can teach me something new, after all I think the life is meaning less if it is not in pursue of knowledge and enlightenment.

 

Were you intentionally avoiding this:

I may choose to enlighten you. The first part is demanding proof. You've already done that. The second part is presenting proof, of which you will denounce as bogus or not factual. I believe that's how it's played, correct?

Have you never done a search on google or msn or yahoo for: allah moon god ?

It might allow you to come to your own conclusions, though I can already predict what that will be

We know who and what you defend

 

No comment on this one either?

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=266328&postcount=712

I took the time to refute your (again) attacks on Christianity. Are you now educated, or was it too tough to dispute?

 

What kind of comment are you looking for, my position is that Islam, Christianity, Bible and Quaran are equally stupid and out of time when you try to apply it to modern time. Can I be any more clear than that?

 

I guess it was too tough to dispute! My bad, you thought I believed what you post? I guess I could understand that under such delusional premises

We see what you attack, exclusively

 

e·qual ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kwl)
adj.
Having the same quantity, measure, or value as another.
Mathematics. Being the same or identical to in value.

Having the same privileges, status, or rights: equal before the law.
Being the same for all members of a group: gave every player an equal chance to win.

Having the requisite qualities, such as strength or ability, for a task or situation: “Elizabeth found herself quite equal to the scene” (Jane Austen).
Adequate in extent, amount, or degree.
Impartial; just; equitable.
Tranquil; equable.
Showing or having no variance in proportion, structure, or appearance.

Dictionary.com

How can be favoring one to another when I said that both Christianity and Islam, Quaran and Bible are equally stupid in present time context?

Face it Gtech since I am not a Muslim and you can not just repeat your Mantra of how bad Islam is , you have nothing to say or discuss. The vast of your knowledge is couple of quotes that you have copied from some hate group web site or have heard from some illiterate war monger preacher back home. I don't even believe that you have even read the Bible, let alone Quaran.

I am still waiting for you to enlighten me about previous non sense that you posted with providing a reference.

 

what americans need to understand is that war isnt a bad thing, its a way to keep peace, but democrats keep it down

 

As long as you are here to lie about it, defend it, make excuses and lies for it, I'll be here to correct you. There's nothing I take more pleasure in. As I've said, we see what you defend and we see what you attack, exclusively. Couple of quotes eh? I haven't even begun to open up on you, rookie!

I might also note, I see what agitates you too!

We see what you attack, exclusively

 

OPEN UP, ENLIGHTEN, SHOW THE LIES, do what ever you like to do but stop talking about it and do it. I think you have already opened up quite nicely and every one can see that it is quite empty.

 

I think Gworld shows a pattern of a Bahai, who claim to be the last and final religion in this world, saying that all the other religion before have had their time and now its theirs.
Alllahuba

 

This must be one of the stupidest comment ever, any new religion must claim that they are better than previous religion, otherwise what is the point?

Bahai claims to be better than Islam, Islam claim to be better Christianity, Christianity claims to be better than Judisem,.......

I believe there is no God and any religion believing in supreme being is equally stupid or in other words science and logic is better than religion.

 

Not even worth my time anymore. You're not the first muslim I've debated whose only chance was to claim Athiest, you won't be the last.

But we see what you attack, exclusively! And I know that "Allah the moon God" makes you very upset, for an Athiest

 

Good idea, when you can't defend your position and opinion then RUN. I think your last 10 posts is just keep repeating the same non sense and treat that you are going to enlighten, show reference, expose lies but YOU NEVER BACK UP YOUR WORDS WITH ANYTHING.
I will gladly debate you in any subject (including but not limited to Alla, moon,..) if you could just provide some frame work, logic and reference for what you are trying to say.
Obviously you are not mentally equipped to debate these questions, why don't you provide us with direct link to hate group web site that you were copying from or ask them or your preacher to join the discussion, may be they can do a better job than you.

 

Why don't I? Because of what you just said. You see, "you claim" to be against all religions with a standard disclaimer sentence or two that says you think "all religions are stupid."

But actions speak louder that words. Barring that one sentence, you exclusively attack Christians, Jews, the USA and Israel. When it comes to allah the moon god, you became agitated, defensive and even angry. You demanded proof with outrage and condemned such before even seeing any proof.

Yet still without any proof, you once again refer to anything I "may present" on the matter as a link from a hate group web site. You've already pre-judged it and you've already made it clear that you will defend it. But gworld? Nah, he's against them all. Well, we see who you attack exclusively and we see who you defend.

I withheld any link on the subject (though I really do have several good ones) to see what you would do. As usual, you make the blanket statement of "all religions are stupid." But that's just a distractor. You think it buys you an "out" when someone notes your constant defending of islam. But it doesn't. We see what you attack and what you defend.

Come up with a new strategy gworld. The disclaimer of "all religions are stupid" then going right back to defend your islam is getting old. You've worn it out.

BTW, caught another one of your buds:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050804/ap_on_re_us/terrorism_arrest_1

 

Gtech

Man arrested in NJ, what that got to do with moon God or any other BS that you have been saying?

This is I don't know how many times (I have lost the count) that I am telling you that if you have anything reasonable (forget reasonable, if you have anything ) to say on subject on moon God or anything else,

PLEASE,

PLEASE,

I BEG YOU ON MY KNEES,

ENLIGHTEN,

EXPOSE THE LIES,

OR GIVE A REFERENCE,

ON ALL THE BS THAT YOU ARE JUST KEEP REPEATING.

 

Why? You've already pre-judged it as BS coming from a hate site, without ever seeing it. You've already defended islam from something you haven't even seen. We see what you attack and what you defend. And quite blatantly might I add

What a putz!

 

Of course they would reject it. Their ambitions for nuke are for war heads and to terrorize, not for power. Why on earth would a country with so many natural resources need nukes for power? The EU says, go for it. We support you in your desire to create nuclear power and they reject the plan? Why else, unless their intentions are completely hostile.

 

Well you have answered my question. You are.

 

gworld = ignorant = misinformed = angry = terroism = ok

 

Thank you for that. Hope you all had a great weekend as well. Got some golfing in, a little bit motorcycle riding and today gonna play with my kid, and hopefully get some cleaning done at home.