What are you say about a US killer of two pakistani "Raymond Davis"

What are you say about a US killer of two pakistani "Raymond Davis".He is innocent or not?

 

Apparently we will find out what the court thinks today.

The "then chased the driver on foot, shooting him dead as well." suggests we haven't heard the right story yet.

 

He killed two innocent then why US says to free him and also US says that he get immunity as a diplomatic but "raymond davis" accept in first investigation that he is contractor.I think he is a CIA and black water agent that work illegal activities in Pakistan.whats are you think about this issue.As by my view the punishment is that "hang to be untill death" whats your opinion.

 

I think the immunity angle is ridiculous. He should be subject to their laws just like anybody else. If their law says he is within his rights, and a Pakistani would go free then set him free too. If their laws say he has comitted a hanging offense then hang him.

I don't think anyone has the right to terminate another life unless it's a 'them or me' thing. If it is shown that he was placed in that position, and was the victim of attempted robbery, then he should walk. If he is just saying that it happened that way to curtail any punishment then yes, eiither lock him up forever, give him to the victims families to sort out, or hang him for lying about it and bringing America into further disrepute.

What about the dead suspects accused of attempted robbery? Are they known for mugging others? We need to hear more about both sides before coming to a real conclusion.

 

The post motim report and eye witness says that attack by "raymond davis" is not act of self defence.He said that he got the money with him from the banks but as investigation that no americian citizen bank account in the banks of this area. Ok as you right the issue in court and we wait for decision but US says that this is not court issue and release the raymond davis whats is this?

 

Given his argument I might agree the first could be construed as self-defense but chasing down then killing the second man is too much of a stretch for the defense argument IMHO. Like I said, I would want to know more to come to a real conclusion.

 

the truth is that america has some contract that gives diplomatic immunity to all the killers in the world if they are americans. no country can harm them, and if they are caught doing something wrong or have killed some one, they shud be deported to the US where they could be held for trial a.k.a. if CIA or BlackWater etc etc, then debriefed and identity changed and all that shit

 

Any evidence of that ?

 

i know that the treate is called giena convention or something like that.....
TBH, dont remember the exact name.

 

Er... no. If a regular US Citizen commits a crime, they do the time according to what country they are in. The U.S only intervenes when it is unfair/in our national interests.

 

If it wasn't self defense, what do you think his motive was? You think he just decided to kill those two guys for the fun of it? Perhaps he was trying to rob them? Seriously, I'd like to hear why you think he did it, if it wasn't self defense.

 

That is for the court to decide. I bet he did it for the lulz.

 

Sure! The US government, specifically the CIA, is recruiting psychopaths who like killing for the lulz and attaching them to Diplomatic missions in politically sensitive areas like Pakistan. It's all so clear to me now!

 

wonder why he stopped at only killing 2?

 

He probably had poor aim and ran out of bullets. I mean, chasing down someone who gave up and ran away is so disciplined, honorable, and just, chivalrous. It must have felt good shooting that man in the back.

 

The first kill is within the bounds of logic. The second one though, defies explanation.
You're a foreigner, no official accreditation, you've just killed a man, AND THEN you decide to chase after the second target on foot?

 

What i think is two less terrorists(future ones) to worry about. He probably saves more lives by terminated these two guys then me or you can imagine.

JK

 

But wait...it gets even stranger...

 

And then it comes out your diplomatic credentials sit on top of a membership with the CIA. It would seem there is more going on here than we are being told. I would be highly surprised if this guy did anything outside the operating parameters of his mission, though I doubt the US govt. will ever let us know what that mission was. That leaves the Pakistani legal system as the only source of details on the matter. Poor bastard. Sucks to be disavowed.

Then again, he could have just been a closet homicidal maniac.

 

its tough shit they picked on the wrong guy, who cares?