I don't think there is truly neutral worlds news media anywhere, as the news is reported by people who have a basis. I do like the job that the Wall Street Journal does.
I don't think there is one, they all accept advertising money from corporations and have to follow the party line. If someone starts excersizing freedom of speech, it may take losing just 10% of ad renvues to go bankrupt Books and internet are the only way to get unbiased news, watch for the legislature to outlaw both in the next few years
I agree that all sources have biases, but we should be looking at those that do not have group corporate ownership. I like DemocracyNow.org I also like PBS and NPR. The Canadian CBC and British BBC are not too bad either. All of these sources spend a lot less time talking about Brittney Spears and Paris Hilton than the MSM.
The CBC here in Canada has always been highly regarded. They are definitely one of the last news outlets that I trust for the most part. CTV seems to make a point of offering the truth, but they're also big on sensationalism.
CTV is one of the most dominant news stations in Canada and CNN to US. You can say CTV is Canadian version of CNN in that regards. But CNN is more bias, like Fox News and Fox News got Bill o Rilley. Yes, Bill O Rilley the guy I like to watch every so often cause he's just such a funny guy. Don't you agree??? ... YES or NO? It's a simple question, YES or NO!
BBC one of the better ones, but BBC still got bias. If the anchor is bias or the reporter is bias they can make the news station bias. Like look at Bill O Rilley.
There is no such thing as neutral media, much as one tries to be, as it is managed by people who are inclined to be biased.