Website design for a beginner

Discussion in 'HTML & Website Design' started by Ghabbar, Nov 10, 2007.

  1. #1
    Hey guys,

    I am beginner in website design. Is it a good idea to start with a html editor like coffeecup to build my first website? I only have the code editor and not the visual editor. Is it worth paying for the visual editor? I know the basics about html for the moment but will continue studying on it.

    Any recommendations on how to create decent web pages without wasting too much time? Any other recommendations also wellcome.

    Thanks
     
    Ghabbar, Nov 10, 2007 IP
  2. Ward Larson

    Ward Larson Peon

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    anyone will tell you that a code editor is better than a visual editor.
    it really depends on your tastes, but IMO it's better to code by hand in a simple text editor.
     
    Ward Larson, Nov 10, 2007 IP
  3. ICE_monky

    ICE_monky Peon

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Doing it by code is a better way to learn simply cuz you get a better grasp on the coding itself rather than doing the cheaters way with a visual editor. But a visual editor does help out alot at times. A decent FREE code editor is NOTEPAD++ and a good FREE code and visual editor is KOMPZER. Check em both out and good luck
     
    ICE_monky, Nov 10, 2007 IP
  4. Ronster

    Ronster Peon

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I use dreamweaver but I also make training vids for noobs who can't afford an expensive code editor.

    This is what I recommend to them,

    kompozer.net
     
    Ronster, Nov 10, 2007 IP
  5. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    436
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Dan Schulz, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  6. Xavier_3D

    Xavier_3D Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,299
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #6
    I suggest you try Frontpage. Helped me alot when I was Learning at the First Time. Just create a Graphic in Normal Mode and then check the Coding.
     
    Xavier_3D, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  7. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    436
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    FrontPage has been abandoned by Microsoft, and was never a good editor to begin with, since the code it produced was often bloated, proprietary and hard to maintain by even the most experienced of developers.
     
    Dan Schulz, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  8. Xavier_3D

    Xavier_3D Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,299
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #8
    Dan Schulz I agree with you there, but the General Coding comes in Handy in beginning. Its later on that you need to add Professional Touches to it. Just my Advise for a Beginner, I am not contradicting your Opinion. I myself am a Dreamweaver Junkie.
     
    Xavier_3D, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  9. bogart

    bogart Notable Member

    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    509
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #9
    Notepad is the best if you really want to learn to code
     
    bogart, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  10. amwyyytg

    amwyyytg Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    391
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #10
    a code editor is better than a visual editor
    This is what I think
     
    amwyyytg, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  11. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #11
    Steer clear of ANYTHING visual, be it frontpage, dreamweaver, or any of the other dozen or so WYSIWYG's because the code they produce is total crap, and if you were to learn ANYTHING from using them, it should be how NOT to write a web page.

    Take a look at the page in Xavier's sig for example (sorry man, I needed an example and you were handy) - Typical bloated wordpress template that has some WYSIWYG (you said Dreamweaver?) telltales in it.

    
    	<li><h2>Menu</h2>
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.xyber3dstudios.com">Main Page</a></li></ul>
    <ul><li><li class="page_item"><a href="http://xyber3dstudios.com/?page_id=2" title="About">About</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://xyber3dstudios.com/?page_id=5" title="Services">Services</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://xyber3dstudios.com/?page_id=6" title="Portfolio">Portfolio</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://xyber3dstudios.com/?page_id=9" title="FAQs">FAQs</a></li>
    </ul></li>
    Code (markup):
    impressive... as far as wasting classes and using nothing but absolute links for no reason goes. The page_item class doesn't even DO anything, there is no reason for 'Main Page' to even BE in a separate UL, no point in putting titles on anchors that are identical to the text contained within (I still say if you need title on an anchor, you've got bigger issues with the text inside the anchor), and since it's being fed from that domain there is no reason to include the full domain on every href.

    Then there's gems like this:
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.xtremehostz.com">Xtreme Hostz</a></li></ul>
    
    
    
    <ul><li><a href="http://miccas.net/in.php?id=29">MICCAS.net</a></li></ul>
    
    
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.area-51.cn">Area 51 - Are you Game Enough?</a></li></ul>
    
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.i-talkies.com">I-Talkies.com</a></li></ul>
    
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.qvideoz.com">Qvideoz.com</a></li></ul>
    
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.adsenseforms.com">Adsense Websites</a></li></ul>
    
    <ul><li><a href="http://www.auctionads.com/refer_ 24e167c0f8408e4b30ce">AuctionAds</a></li></ul>
    Code (markup):
    Wow, just wow.

    Mind you, it's a turdpress template - we don't expect good code out of that since 99%+ of them vomit up some tags and pretend to call it HTML...
     
    deathshadow, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  12. bquast

    bquast Active Member

    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #12
    yes but I create my pages with dreamweaver, just have to watch what it does to your pages, mine do not have as much added stuff, because I do the majority of the codingby hand, and just use dreamweaver for the css tooltips and such. Dreamweaver for layouts is more of a visual look at what I am creating, because I want to make sure i can see it as I create it.
     
    bquast, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  13. Ghabbar

    Ghabbar Peon

    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Thanks for the tips guys.
    Text editor it is. Thanks or recommending the book Dan, I will order from Amazon.
     
    Ghabbar, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  14. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #14
    That's what alt-tab to Opera, F5, alt-tab to Firefox, F5, alt-tab to IE 6, F5, alt-tab to IE7, F% and alt-tab to Safari, F5 is for (in that order) since you should be checking the appearance in the actual BROWSERS as you go, instead of coding a whole layout with possibly broken code, then spending hours scouring the web for silver bullet fixes.

    Because what a designer REALLY needs is ANOTHER rendering engine - one that end users would never see - added to the mix.
     
    deathshadow, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  15. soulscratch

    soulscratch Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    964
    Likes Received:
    45
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #15
    ^ Except CTRL R is easier to reach than F5 :)
     
    soulscratch, Nov 11, 2007 IP
  16. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #16
    Take one hand off the mouse. ;)
     
    deathshadow, Nov 11, 2007 IP