Recalling when I was first introduced to SEO, somebody said about search engine don't like php. So, what if a html directory will be have more SEO affinity compared to its php counterpart?
This has been discussed many times before and it was in my opinion in-conclusive meaning that sites with large volumes of traffic I dont think it makes much difference whether dynamic or static, but over the years we have had some low volume traffic sites that have held indexed pages better in .html But certainly there will be differing results to your query
Static HTML is a rather silly method for a directory due to the quantity of submissions that is likely to be recieved... using a CMS at the best of times can be very time consuming! Directory scripts in PHP have also become a lot more SEO friendly with the ability to generate SEO friendly URLs etc so php really is the best and obviously choice!
even though it seems that php gets indexed faster .. but from experience the faster they get indexed they end up getting deindexed too .. the pages deviate so much that its very hard to find the mean in there. its all over the place. one day u might 1000 indexed pages ... the next its 700 than 500 than 300 than bak to 400. i prefer html because its more stable.
Just for clarification it is very easy to mix dynamic and static on the same site we have our main directory in both static and dynamic side by side we prefer the option to select either or It gives us that flexibility the we like
who says php is not better..... Using Php script you can generate htm or html pages dynamically... and it's ease to use and 100% SEO friendly and easy to handle....
I choose PHP because : - make links management easier, no need to "download, edit, upload" file for updates. - can change theme easily. - can be integrated with other scripts. - can do dynamic stuff like filtering/sorting/searching where static HTML can't. I don't think there's any relation to SEO whether you're using php/asp/cfm/any other script or plain HTML. But if you really want static HTML, there are some directory scripts that have capability to generate static version. If not mistaken 'PowerSeek' script have this kind of feature.
Static probably better, but the marginal gain doesn’t compensate the headaches of updating a HTML site IMHO.
I would agree php is THE way, the database. When you have to handle links that can go up to hundreds per day and the housekeeping your links after some time. For .html, i.e http://www.swapware.org/ have to regenerate the html at each link adding event, I would imagine that will be very slow, and I can't imagine how to reedit. One thing still unsloved in my head, just say your link is in ../internet/directory in page 1, as time go by it will go to page 2, 3 and so on. How search engine treat this kind of 'dynamic'. Btw, my SEO paper=0%
you can spoof .html with modrewrite in php. Just make sure to have the name in the folder or file name structure somewhere. Personally I like to have my structure look like: /shopping/cart/ rather than /shopping/cart.html
Whenever this kind of question arises, we somehow tend to forget the fact that Google crawls almost any page whether it's html or php. Of course in terms of SE friendly, any dynamic page is not recommended, especially the file name is long. But as long as G crawls, there should be no worries. I have experienced in both and G gave PR in deepest pages on both, html based or php. It really is a matter of how G thinks your site to let PR points pass to deeper pages. Sitemap helps for this, as you know. Or building links to inner pages. Some of very SE unfriendly CMS's still can gain PR.
The truth is that either one will work fine, but like anything else it will need to be done correctly. I chose an html format because it was more of a challenge and I had a lot of fun doing it, plus I did not feel like taking the time to learn a new program so I just went with what I knew. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. But here is an idea of what you are going to be up against when building an html directory. 1). You will need to start off by choosing a design. The design which you create for the category page can act as a template for the other pages. 2). You will need to name each category page by hand. 3). You will need to write seperate title tags and descriptions and keywords for each category page by hand (unless you do not want to be seo freindly). 4). You will need to add all listings manually. (a simple copy and paste will work fine if your payment option is set up for it). 5). When making a sitewide change the best thing to do is use your find and replace feature which will make the changes alot faster, however, once the changes are made you then need to upload the entire website by hand (select all will work just fine). For the most part it is in fact a very long process, mainly with creating the files, and depending on how many categories you have this could take a couple of weeks, or sooner if you have more spare time. But once you have everything set up the way you want it then added listings is a breeze. I do not know much about php because I never use it for anything, but I would say that if you do not have alot of time on your hands and want to put something together real quick then I think that is the best option for you. My only complaint with php is that although the search engines do pick up php extentions it seems that it takes longer for them to do so, I have never had a problem getting my html pages indexed quickly. The other thing regarding php is that these directories seem to have alot more supplemental results, why that is I am not really sure, my guess is because most directories do not redirect the non www to www or vice versa. In regards to page rank and whether or not it flows better in html or php I would say that it is a tie. Page rank can only flow evenly when all pages have been indexed, so when you see directories that have say pr 5 on homepage and then pr 4 on the contact page but then you see pr 0 in one of the categories, this only means that those pages were not indexed at the time when google took it's snap shot of pr and therefore those pages will have to wait until the next update before they get any pr. I only recommend buiding a directory in html if you have the time and patience that is needed in order to make it work, if not, then just go with php it will be the faster route to take.
errr.. i don't know why anyone hasn't posted this, but you can use php in html by just using an addhandler to parse your html as php. so in doing so, you can maintain your static html pages and use php within, but still come out as html. /me shrugs...
Agreed. It would not be that much of a big deal to just add a few bells and whistles to the html in order to get the features that you are looking for.
This is in reference to the above quote you can very well create a HTML directory by using .htaccess also I first created www.annexagain.com with that like that only When I tweaked it for Search Engine friendly urls it looked like www.annexagain.com/1.html (Arts category) Then I made it to look like Then there I changed the Urls in a page to look like this www.annexaagain.com/arts.html by visting www.annexagain.com/1.html and saving it as www.annexagain.com/arts.html! and in the main index pages I changed the urls like this [CATEGORY_NAME].html on each category The link will look like /arts.html so when you click on the link it will go to arts.html page! And for the subpages it will look like arts2.html Anon I hope you now understand it better! suppose if there is url like this http://www.jeffbrowninc.com/blogs/ you can just open the page in your browser and save it as .html and then just upload to this folder http://www.jeffbrowninc.com/blogs/ as index.html thats it and turn of .htaccess when you again click on the Arts link in the main page you will be having a static html page thats it! and this can be also easily maintained by a database as when someone submit any link you can just add it and visit the page in your browser and save it! and then upload it!