James Ostrowski, NY Ron Paul coordinator is confirming that Rudy will drop out and will endorse John McCain tomorrow via LewRockwell.com We started with 11, and now there are 4.
Sorry, I just don't buy that. I believe you are a better person than that. I disagree here too. You used to rip some ass about "terrorist supporters" here. It wasn't that long ago. If you disagree with some of your fellow supporters for embracing the views and support of terrorists, you should speak out. That's part of the "if you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything." Trust me, the only reason they give you a pass on anything is because of who you support and who you give a pass too. I wouldn't consider that "thinking for myself." I still have hope for you, Nate. You were a better man than that. I believe you still are.
That's great news. Does this mean that Ron Paul will get more than 3 minutes in tonights CNN debate, or will it turn out to be another very very tedious McCain/Romney love fest.
Well I do find it amazing that he gets the same amount of time if there are 4 people on the stage, or 10.
You don't believe I grew up listening to Rush Limbaugh? Well I can't really prove it, my parents were divorced and my mom had a job and went to college so I lived with my politically enthused grandparents. I listened to what they listened to since I was 2 I was once narrow minded to the point that anyone who had an opinion other than the one we had was "anti-American". Little did i know that was the kind of emotions our czar wanted. There should never be a time where opinions are silenced in the name of "patriotism". I never needed anyone's pass on anything. In real life, it was always the groups of people that needed MY pass on anything, never the other way around. When I first made the political switch, I didn't do it by the measure of this forum. If you remember I took a break from here for a couple months after being infracted. It was a debate in late october that got me interested in politics again when I listened to Ron Paul speak. It's simple, I believe in low government involvement, free-market and the Constitution. because anything else doesn't have a foundation, it's just a rogue agenda that somehow caught on to be the main theme in politics. and terrorism? sure i'm concerned about it, it exists. And we should fight it, INTELLIGENTLY. Here's the best I can describe it in an analogy with health. You can fight terrorism all you want with bombs, soldiers and blood, but if you don't stop to think about the incentives and causes, then you'll never defeat it. With health, you can take prescription drugs that KILL you more all you want, or.. you can learn why you had the problem in the first place. Why do people have so much cancer and diabetes these days? well it's not just a coincidence, there's a lot of factors! First you have chemicals that the government purposely puts in your food, water and air.. then there's the factor of what's your LIFESTYLE like? Are you eating nonhuman foods? That surely causes an acidic body, which causes a lot of problems. Eventually you'll find out the why's if you look hard enough and have a solid foundation of how you can solve the problems by getting the problems at the ROOT. Same with terrorism. More war is the potent antibiotic. And any health guru knows, antibiotics kill good bacteria, lower immunity and set the works for candida overgrowth! So maybe terrorists have an incentive to strap a bomb to their chest and go to a crowded place a blow the whole place up. You see, disease is actually good. Because it tells you there's a problem and it needs to be corrected. Terrorism is not good, but it's a way of saying a problem needs corrected. Have you ever played the board game Risk and someone tries to be the "global police"? My friend does that and it pisses everyone off, and we usually form a coalition to destroy him. Nobody likes global policing. Don't you think just a little bit that that might be the cause of some of our problems? Let's just say it's not and go by your theory that terrorists hate us because we're free. If that's the case, then we'll always be at war! There's no such thing as an incurable or a bacteria or virus that keeps reinfecting someone with a healthy system. That's called playing you for a fool and suckering your money out of you.
Too much RP rhetoric for me, Nate. It's like reading a comment by a borg after they've been assimilated. Good luck to you!
i'm sure when it comes down to talking about politics without all the monkey shit fights you're nowhere to be seen! why is that? don't slip outta here like the wet bag of shit Romney did. you're better than that!
Nate, a while back you suggested if people ate healthy they wouldn't get cancer. I'm simply doing you a favor. I know the RP rhetoric when I see it. Good luck to you.
Like removing all the troops from the middle east? http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDVkOTUzOTBmMThiZjY1N2JkYzUwYzI2OGEzMTdjYzE=
Are you referring to the post you made awhile back about the baby having cancer? I can tell you why that happens.
Yes. It was in response to the post you made, that people only need to eat healthy and they wouldn't get cancer.
Yep, you hit the nail on the head. I've watched beheadings before, I know it exists. But what are we accomplishing by provoking it? It's actually pretty f*cking simple, if you get attacked by a terrorist group, then you go after them and violently kill that group. Wala, you're done. No pissing around after that or nation building. But for some reason it's become the "republican platform" to "fight'em over there instead of over here!". No that's just called being stupid and waste of money. Use common sense, keep it simple.
Newborns have birth defects or illnesses because their parents were unhealthy. If you have a bad tree, it will bear bad fruit. You oughtta know, you're a Christian conservative. If you have bad fruit it will bear bad seeds. No different with humans. And it isn't just eating healthy but controlling the other facts I mentioned like the chemicals they put in your water and that crisp smelling aluminum, barium, mercury and other chemicals they put in the sky above you.
Have you considered writing about this amazing discovery in JAMA? Might be a tough schedule, in between blaming America first. Was very big of you to admit that. I've been pointing it out for a long time of certain people here. At least you had the balls to own up to it.
hate to break it to ya buddy but they don't talk about cures or health in the "journal of the american medical association". they talk about prescription drugs and how to make a profit off of suckas like you. I really don't care if you believe me or not, I would say the history of my health is proof that I know 10 times more about health than 99% of the medical doctors. Yeah, it sounds crazy. But I think you'll be willing to learn a LOT more when your life is on the line, rather than for your own ego and going to medschool so you can pickpocket other suckas and live lavishly on a f*cking hillside with your vain wife that has married you because you're rich. I don't write on second class sites like JAMA, I'm at www.curezone.com