way of linking 8K+ pages in google

I'm thinking that is this good what I done. I got over 8,000 pages indexed in google (one domain) and I put on it random links to my other sites (every refesh links are random). So my question is, that is better to put random links, or static.

 

I don't know much, but I think that it could go either way. Random links might be harder to snag since they'll be different at every refresh, but also it will get more exposure to different links if they are randomized.

 

Have you just got 8k of pages with nothing but a single link to other sites that you own?

I would think that google with punish you for that sort of thing? (Still very new to this whole SEO thing.. Sorry if this is a silly question )

 

nope - this is full legal website, and links are at the bottom of pages.

 

I'd go for static, if the site is DB driven (hope so with 8K pages) you could always base what link is shown by a modulus of an ID, that way the same links would appear on the same pages without you having to do too much repetitive work.

 

Ahhh I was wondering..

Yeah I was thinking about doing something like that on one of my community sites.. I have already hard coded one static link to one of my sites that I am trying to push but I have been reading that having all the pages on my site link to the same address with the same link text will do more to damage then help my ranking.. Going to try and randomise it a bit later today..

 

Hard to say what is "right" but we do a combination.

For search terms we are targeting long-term we use static links. Then we have some rotating links that we generally use on secondary phrases or to get new sites indexed, etc.

ALSO - You can hash the URL string as another option to tying to an ID.

 

That's the way I think I'd be going, but I'm an SEO newbie, so don't take my word for it

 

go with static.

 

Variety is the spice of life. I'd go with static if you can access them.

 

thanks, I think I go this way