I think Afghan war is an inside job, it's just Taliban powdered up to look like white Nato soldiers killing people so they can make America look bad. Bush and Obama are Muslim agents paid to accept that those are American soldiers.
I seriously doubt that. I am sure you have plenty of proof to support your claims. If you think so why don't you create a new thread for this? because I don't see it is linked with this topic in any way.
I am going to be mad with this guy! I am pretty sure he has small brain. Don't answer properly and jumping from one to another. if you think Afgan war is an inside job then no problem, show us some documentary and try to prove like people who think 911 was an Inside job (national geography may also help, but may be they supports terrorists as per your knowledge), we will be happy to entertain if we get time for you. start another thread. and I think... no I am pretty sure you are a MAD.
when it comes to Afghanistan, America is fighting for Mineral ans NATO expecting share out of that resources.. but the prb is that afghans are not Iraqies.. they born at mountains and live with dignity.. can you imagine that they use to make weapon with used weapon of NATO and america itself.. with scrap and then they use it back and america and NATO suffers .. hehe
I could never understand why so many people assume that it would take thousands of people to pull off a 9/11 conspiracy when the actual event (if you believe the official story) took only a few dozen to plan and implement the attacks. Depending on the specific theory, adding a conspiracy element to the official events wouldn't add many more people.
Based on the voting results in this thread unfortunately only thing I'm sure in is that something similar 9/11 is going to be repeated...
That is why you are wrong. For you, this has nothing to do with science, right? You WANT 911 to be an inside job, don't you? Why do you want to defend terrorists? You obviously know nothing about building materials - so what is your agenda in defending terrorists?
this is not about defending terrorist. there is terrorism in the world that is wrong and at fault. I don't want this to be an inside job because attacking the taliban and iraq would be in vain. it would be wrong. this is about finding answers no matter what the conclusions imply. making an observation about something that concerns enginerring is not necessarily wrong if the person making the observation does not have an engineering degree
How can you make an observation about Engineering if you don't understand Engineering? How can you write "there wasn't enough weight to collapse the entire building" when you don't know how much weight is required to collapse the the entire building, or how to do the calculus to determine how much weight is required? You don't even know the formula, do you? Can you even recognize a 2nd order differential equation? Isn't that like criticizing a surgeon for using the wrong vascular clamp when you can't even recognize a vascular clamp? You epitomize the principle of Dilbert's pointy-haired boss, which is this: Anything that You Don't Understand You Think Must Be Easy.
i didn't say it was easy, i forgot the sources where i could link for you but its reasonable to think that a structure sustained a hit like the first tower that was hit wouldn't collapse like a house of cards there are engineers that made or are featured in youtube videos that cannot explain the collapse of the first tower at least. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpP_soa8B1M
What??????????? Try to write that again, and try to have it make sense, please. And please, don't be rude and give me a homework assignment by linking to someone else's work. If you don't understand the material well enough to explain it here, then you don't understand what you are linking to, do you?
could it be that the terrorists ridged the three buildings with explosives and admitting that they did would scare every person living or working in a building?