Warrantless WireTapping does not violate the 4th Amendment, says Bush

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by gauharjk, Apr 4, 2008.

  1. #1
    The EFF (Electronics Frontier Foundation) has uncovered a troubling footnote in a newly declassified Bush Administration memo, which asserts that 'our Office recently [in 2001] concluded that the Fourth Amendment had no application to domestic military operations.' This could mean that the Administration believes the NSA's warrantless wiretapping and data mining programs are not governed by the Constitution, which would cast Administration claims that the programs did not violate the Fourth Amendment in a whole new light — after all, you can't violate a law that doesn't apply. The claimed immunity would also cover other DoD agencies, such as CIFA, which carry out offline surveillance of political groups within the United States.

    Source: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/0...fourth-amendment-domestic-military-operations
    www.slashdot.org
     
    gauharjk, Apr 4, 2008 IP
  2. Bernard

    Bernard Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    107
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #2
    The military is above the supreme law of the land? America, F Yeah!
     
    Bernard, Apr 4, 2008 IP