I am looking to hire someone to help increase my pr.Due to G recent update i have lost some pr to my auto site i would like to increase the pr to 6 or higher i belive i should need around 20 links from pr 6 sites.links must be one way and from auto sites i may also want this doing for the finance section and insurance depending on cost.anyone interested?
Hi there, I offer this service. http://www.private-designs.com/relevant-link-building.html I may have gotten something from you so if I did check your e-mail. I responded to all of my e-mails today. Eric
There are actually quite a few. That page doesnt have that many but some of the other pages are horrible. I need to get that fixed.
Does anyone else offer link building services that aren't reciprocal? Zman -- Your prices are reasonable, but I'd like to contract you for 100 links but do not want to add 100 links to my own site, unless of course there is more of a benefit by adding reciprocal links to my site as well?
This is to be expected.. Anyone offer this kind of service? What are the benefits of non-reciprocal links? Are the benfits worth it?
Well they are ONE WAY links so yes there is huge benefits. You can expect to pay anywhere from $3.00 to $300.00 per month per link for one way links depending on the page, website, traffic, PR, etc.
Lots of folks sell one-way links, but I can't think of anyone I would recommend. An alternative is contracting with someone to do directory submissions for you. Directory submissions will get you a good mass of low-value links. They are low-value, but they do add up. I have been contracting with Padawan to help me with directory submissions, and I recommend his services highly. They have exceeded all expecations. This is a huge debate in the SEO world. Here is my current viewpoint: 1. Non-reciprocal links are not worth any more than reciprocal links as far as PR or SERPS are concerned. 2. Non-reciprocal links do have an advantage over reciprocal links, because you don't have to go to the effort of modifying your own pages.
Thanks, Will. Your post was very informative. Guess I might as well start with reciprocal and see where it gets me. Any link building campaign is better than the one I have now -- NONE, haha. Thanks again, all.
According to the results of my testing, Google treats a sitewide link just like a single link. Therefore, sitewide links just waste screen real-estate.
I agree Will. I have seen no benefit to a sitewide over a single link in all my experiences. In fact, I have paid for sitewide links but asked to only be on the homepage.
This would definitely make sense. I would think the SEs only would give credit for having a link from a particular site, and not take into consideration that there may be that same link on every page. If the link IS on every page, it's probably determined to be part of the sites main navigation which does not necessarily mean the link is more relevant or should have a greater weight.
OK, this kinda shatters my little world. So what's the point in purchasing sitewide liks then? I wanted to do this recently but exceeded my budget. You say it is not worth it? Should I do only frontpage links?
Well sitewides are good for traffic if it is the right kind of site. I pay for a few sitewides on forums because forums have a ton of pages and it is more likely to get clicks if you are on every page. If you are buying sitewides for rank purposes I would rethink your strategy. Your money could be better spent spreading single links over a wider variety of IP's and URL's. My two cents.
I concur with zman. I would also add that frontpage links are not necessary. Subpage links are also very good.
What about linking hosted sites on directory of domain like www.domain.com/mysite. If I have a few sites like that and do sitewide likns like that what effect will it have? I run a custom storefront on a site like that.