Vista Sucks! Microsoft can't even give it away

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by rmartish, Dec 30, 2007.

  1. Infidel

    Infidel Active Member

    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #261
    Now, i haven't read this whole thread (13 pages wtf) but i have been using vista for about a year now, it has served me very well. It has been slow once or twice but vista is not as bad as people seem to think it is. The slowness is very exaggerated. There are a few flaws that i have found (some which don't seem to be public yet) but only one of them has been major so far. I have never had vista crash on me. The security is a bit bad however that can be disabled or changed. I have not found one program that has not worked on vista, scratch that, i believe one of the cracks that i used once didn't work. One thing i do not like about vista is the networking, however thats more of a pet peeve then an actual problem (private vs public lan networks screws with my mind). It seems to me that most of the people who bash vista openly have very little experience with it or they are just know Windows Xp as the norm. This tends to happen in many difference aspects of computers and life (people hated xp when it came out), and until very recently most people hated xp, anyone else notice that no one is bitching about how much xp "sucks" now?
     
    Infidel, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  2. rmartish

    rmartish Peon

    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #262
    Actually Vista is bloated and I know people don't like to hear it. Just check the requirement to run it. Remember this is and OS: which means it's suppose to be the layer between your hardware and the user that's it.
     
    rmartish, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  3. futhey

    futhey Peon

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #263
    Yeah, I'd go for ditching the GUI alltogether if we could live without it ;)
     
    futhey, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  4. rmartish

    rmartish Peon

    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #264
    If your running a server you better. The GUI takes up most of your resources.
     
    rmartish, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  5. CrimsoniteX

    CrimsoniteX Active Member

    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #265
    True, Vista is a bit "bloated", but just bring up System Config. and turn off everything you don't need under services. That alone will increase your performance a good deal :)
     
    CrimsoniteX, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  6. rmartish

    rmartish Peon

    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #266
    So, basically stick with XP.
     
    rmartish, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  7. CrimsoniteX

    CrimsoniteX Active Member

    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #267
    No, I was referring to like actual services (like WLAN Autoconfig, when you don't use wifi), not Aero or any of that. Vista is still a more stable operating system.
     
    CrimsoniteX, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  8. lordadel

    lordadel Active Member

    Messages:
    1,035
    Likes Received:
    88
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #268
    well the best thing about windows vista is its nice shape for me
    i think it isnt that bad
     
    lordadel, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  9. baldy

    baldy Peon

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #269
    Do agree with most of what is said in this thread.
    I purchased a new HP with pre-installed Vista,got it up & running,within 2 hrs contacted HP about having it removed & installing XP.
    Their reply:- "Warranty will not be recognized,we do know that the general public are not liking Vista,but Microsoft tell us to keep persevering & they will.
    WE recognize that it is slow to start up & that it does use a lot of resources.
    At present (until Microsoft decided exactly what they want to do with XP) we are instructed to continue with Vista"

    I have since removed Vista & gone back to XP2 not worried about the B----y warranty,it is not worth anything anyway
     
    baldy, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  10. cnredd

    cnredd Peon

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #270
    I never get anything until it's been fully evaluated by the public...

    "The next big thing" ALWAYS has kinks in it until it gets re-released, then re-re-released...
     
    cnredd, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  11. renlok

    renlok Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    457
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #271
    mine does i just disable all of vistas features.
     
    renlok, Jan 21, 2008 IP
  12. XandroZ

    XandroZ Peon

    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #272
    The problem with vista, is that superfetch, that use most of the memory doesn't work properly (it is a good idea) but the implementation is very bad, plus a lot of incompatibilities with programs.

    If you use only office programs , maybe you don't have any problems but when you render something with Maya or DAZ and after and hour of waiting to finish the program crash because of a runtime error or security access problem( even I am login as administrator) you really start to hate it.
    Also I am software tester where I work and many software that are classified Windows Vista ready are crashing.

    I tested also Vista with SP1RC but things are not better.It is a RC but are not big improvements.

    And another thing XP with SP3 is much faster then Vista SP1.
    Also Vista is a also have big security flaws as XP. We made it (at work ) a test with viruses and scanning tools on Vista only,Vista with Kaspersky and Vista with SafeandSec, and Vista only is almost like XP.The only thing in plus is that annoying security "ask system" .
     
    XandroZ, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  13. X0G

    X0G Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #273
    I'm running Vista right now, I hate it.

    I always go back and forth from XP to Vista.

    XP performs much better than Vista, and isn't loaded with a bunch of garbage
     
    X0G, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  14. lifetalk

    lifetalk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    44
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #274
    Well.. I've used both Vista and XP.

    Both of them are good.. but I always prefer XP :D
     
    lifetalk, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  15. qazu

    qazu Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #275
    That's the software company's fault. Not Vista's.

    An older OS will always be faster and its hardware requirements will be less as its less advanced :(

    Every OS has vulnerbilities that are exploitable, there is no such thing as a secure OS. However, Vista is more secure than XP.
     
    qazu, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  16. leeza

    leeza Peon

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #276
    I hope it will improve after some patchs. :) , just a idea
     
    leeza, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  17. gerwinjz76

    gerwinjz76 Peon

    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #277
    Vista works so complicated and so slow. They should have a way to make it faster just like that of XP... :D
     
    gerwinjz76, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  18. rmartish

    rmartish Peon

    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #278
    Hopefully Microsoft get it and decides to go with consumers and release a more leaner and meaner Vista.
     
    rmartish, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  19. lifetalk

    lifetalk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    44
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #279
    It's resource intensive. If you've got the right configuration (hardware specs) it'll work good for you :)
     
    lifetalk, Jan 22, 2008 IP
  20. ruffnat

    ruffnat Peon

    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #280
    well said and I agree with you
     
    ruffnat, Jan 22, 2008 IP