Verizon Wins $33 Million in Suit Over Domain Names

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by xtreme fever, Dec 25, 2008.

  1. #1
    xtreme fever, Dec 25, 2008 IP
  2. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #2
    This suit is a far cry from the average person who uses a trademark in a domain name. In addition, nobody tried to defend the lawsuit and it resulted in a default judgment. Lastly, the company being sued had a history of purposely registering hundreds or thousands of infringing names.

    That being said, there is always a risk when using a trademark term in a domain name and everyone should be cautious or obtain legal advice before doing so.
     
    browntwn, Dec 25, 2008 IP
  3. Business Attorney

    Business Attorney Active Member

    Messages:
    621
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #3
    Verizon has been awarded $33.15 million from OnlineNIC arising out of the OnlineNIC's cybersquatting activities.

    According to Verizon's 480+ page complaint filed in June, 2008, the San Francisco-based OnlineNIC is a domain registrar that registered over 600 domain names like iphonefromverizon.com, itunesverizon.com, and treoverizon.com.

    No one from OnlineNIC appeared answer the complaint, so the court "concluded that OnlineNIC's bad-faith registrations of Verizon-related domain names were designed to attract web users who were seeking to access Verizon's legitimate websites and calculated an award based on $50,000 per domain name," Verizon said in a press release.

    http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2008/court-awards-verizon.html
     
    Business Attorney, Dec 29, 2008 IP
  4. Dave Zan

    Dave Zan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #4
    Heh, and Verizon is going to get...what, I wonder?

    It's not really that groundbreaking as Verizon purports it to be. Even though
    OnlineNIC has a California address, I doubt Verizon will have much use for just
    their registrar accreditation if the bulk of their assets are beyond their reach.
     
    Dave Zan, Dec 30, 2008 IP
  5. domainplayer

    domainplayer Peon

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    that is so lame. I don't think that verizon should be able to sue them just for have domains unless that are misrepresenting them and actively trying to discourage customers for verizon with the domain names
     
    domainplayer, Dec 30, 2008 IP
  6. WandaZ

    WandaZ Peon

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    It will be interesting to see what, if anything, Verizon does to collect on its judgment. Even though OnlineNIC is supposedly based in California, I wouldn't be surprised if its assets were located elsewhere. Though, one set of assets they can't hide is their domain name portfolio
     
    WandaZ, Dec 30, 2008 IP
  7. GUESTID

    GUESTID Peon

    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Well companies like OnlineNIC are responsible for those parked domains and I find it disappointing that the domain I want to buy has been taken over already.

    Good lesson taught to them !
     
    GUESTID, Dec 30, 2008 IP
  8. iBLOGCASH

    iBLOGCASH Member

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #8
    thats crazy. ah well. crazy they got sued for having PARKED domains. dont make sense. they werent using them for anything profitable to them.
     
    iBLOGCASH, Dec 30, 2008 IP
  9. sineater213

    sineater213 Banned

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    yeah same here I can't believe they own random domains that aren't even worth anything, I contacted them for a domain they had parked and they wanted $800.
     
    sineater213, Dec 30, 2008 IP