Using "Free Traffic System" for their free content?!

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by NetProGamer, Jul 5, 2009.

  1. #1
    Just started using Free Traffic System on my blog and wanted to know if it's worth using.

    There are 3 links on the first post they have done and I pressume will be on every post.

    2 links are to the same Squidoo lens which is related and ranked 16000 overall and 1 link to a none related website.

    I have started using it because I am not a good writer and wanted to start making enough money to start outsourcing my content writing first.

    So, how much of an effect does having those 3 (no follow) outbound links on every coming post have on my site?

    Any other advice welcome,

    Thanks.
     
    NetProGamer, Jul 5, 2009 IP
  2. Giamatti

    Giamatti Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    148
    #2
    hi there,

    im a free traffic user too. can you show me the post you are talking about?

    the free content is very good of fre traffic system. 1 article can be published to 30 blogs or 40 atmost so that meas that your article is somewhat duplicate. yet its fresh and new content for your site. thats a thing that google likes.


    everyone that doesnt know what free traffic system is, click on my sig link "build unlimited backlinks for free!"
     
    Giamatti, Jul 6, 2009 IP
  3. may may

    may may Peon

    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I use that too. I put up two articles and I have about 50 links so far according to the status report.
    I did a check in both Google and Yahoo, but I can't find a single link which was mentioned in the status report. Any advice?
     
    may may, Jul 6, 2009 IP
  4. Giamatti

    Giamatti Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    148
    #4
    give the search engines some time to crawl the pages where your links are on.
     
    Giamatti, Jul 7, 2009 IP
  5. waxman1000

    waxman1000 Peon

    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I think some blog owners take out some of the links. I have that problem too!
     
    waxman1000, Jul 7, 2009 IP
  6. NetProGamer

    NetProGamer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #6
    I've took the post off and stopped using it now. I didn't realize the same article went to 40 other blogs... hmmm.
     
    NetProGamer, Jul 7, 2009 IP
  7. steveeyes

    steveeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #7
    I use FTS and the results so far has been disappointing. I guess their ads is not to take seriously. For example, they say that your article will be posted on 30 blogs. Far from it. I assume the blog owner can decide if they want your article or not, but FTS doesn't explain that.

    I have not see any backlinks as of yet. Maybe because the one poster above indicated they are no follow links.

    A lot of hype by FTS and they seem to always on the defensive why you will not see all your backlinks (not just from google). It still may be worth a try, but if you are putting a lot of energy into it, you may be disappointed by the results compared to your efforts.
     
    steveeyes, Aug 4, 2009 IP
  8. mustafakamal

    mustafakamal Peon

    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    FTS is a great tool for content too...

    i use it myself...
     
    mustafakamal, Sep 6, 2009 IP
  9. mustafakamal

    mustafakamal Peon

    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Isnt the objective of FTS is to gain backlinks...

    I dun think FTS is the place to go to get unique content. :D
     
    mustafakamal, Sep 6, 2009 IP