But I thought you can't give votes to the same person without 'spreading some around'. Looking at the timeline, he must have spread some around between us over the course of at least an hour then. I thought one of his threads was about how busy he was... Oh well, his votes are blue anyway Guess he wasted that time.
Yes, you may be right -- it doesn't really matter, actually... I just couldn't figure out what the blue/grey/pinkish-mauve-or-whatever-color-they-are buttons meant
See here for the current charts: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/memberlist.php?&order=asc&sort=reputation&pp=30&page=0 PRbot has to try harder to beat Anthony. I'm sure he will though!
Hehe - Man, Even after that session of trying to get Anthony back to green, he's still at the bottom... Wow - He really did enter the forum with a bang didn't he
Cant believe someone in Red is using atlas shrugged as their avatar. Atlas shrugged is all about getting ahead on your own hard work and doing it right; not by cheating or using anyone else.
I've noticed (and this is a general human behavior as well) that people usually only give someone a negative reputation if it's a post that they don't like... for example, ones that call all of us sheep! Oh, and I received a few reputation non-changers from what appears to be PRBot as well. Not surprising.
I have been... though only when they are witty or somehow profound & very informative. If it's someone saying "I agree" or just being silly, I don't. But the post must stand out. I will start leaving comments when I give rate people's posts as well. For me, negative ones will go to spam, illogical rants, and simply immoral posts. (Haven't seen any of the latter yet.)
I want everyone to vote against Shawn, I want him to beat me not PR or qll, who in the hell is qll? I really do not have time to research who these folks are, but they sure have you guys up in arms. I just don't have time to look at that kind of crap, sorry guys, plus I could not care less about the reputation system I am not hurt by my lack of live links here, but it does hurt DP forums and the members here. It has zero affect on me
That'd be harsh Anthony... Voting away Shawn's signature rights.. Will he loose the blog link as well? If it is truly democratic then he should loose those rights just as we do but I can imagine the complications...
So what, I can campaign against whoever I wish, if I am mad at Shawn why can't I vote him out? If I can rail against Google, M$, GWB, why not Shawn?
New Financial & Inv ... 10-04-2004 04:04 PM Are you NAIVE? ... 10-04-2004 02:08 PM UNLIMITED PR7,8,9 Ba ... 10-04-2004 01:32 PM PR5, PR4, PR3 Links ... 10-04-2004 03:22 AM PR5, PR4, PR3 Links ... 10-04-2004 03:07 AM seems I got the same thing on the same date - someone musta been running around playin
Grey means that whoever cast the vote, doesn't yet have voting privileges (Too few posts/too low rep)...
Yup, I got two of those... and considering the threads they were in, it wasn't difficult for me to figure out who gave those non-changers to me. *cough*PR*cough* Oh, and you could give Shawn negative reputation, but he also has access to the levels in the vBulletin administrative control panel, and could adjust them as needed. Of course, he's moral and I don't think that he actually would--but the option exists!
I've got a couple negative hits before, but you are right, I don't change it. There are 13 users with higher total reputation than me. Oh well. No one gives me crap! hehe