I guess that could be a huge mistake and turn into a full fledged 3rd world war, since iran is a democracy and will fight till death , it has support from countries like china , north korea , whole of middle east may support iran . Oil price may cross $500 . Source : http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/aug/02/military-action-against-iran-on-the-table-says-us.htm
agree, bombing Iran is a great mistake and will turn region to hell even if Iran wouldn't response it. So bad situation I think inflation will rise rapidly here. don't know what are you talking about!!! who will fight? Iranian!? China voted against Iran in security council. you kidding me! Arabs countries love to see our fall. 500$ is high price I think, don't know how much it possible.
I think you might be misunderstanding the article. Of course we have a plan. I think the US government has a contingency plan for just about everything under the sun. It doesn't actually mean that we are intending to use it.
Oxford Research Group: Israeli Military Strike on Iran Will Lead to a Protracted War and Will Not Solve Nuclear Crisis But hey, if the US of A is crazy enough to launch an attack against Iran, be my guest.
Iran would like nothing more than being bombed by either Israel or USA. US is spent by the Republican debacle of Iraq, the middle east knows it and if not Iran another nation of the region surly will take advantage.
instigating war is a crime and I don't think the world is ready for another Iraqi situation. Let is be a contingency plan r wat ever, the issue of starting up a war should be totally eliminated from the minds
Hardeep, the UK would not go alone. As with Iraq and Afhanistan, it would be a coalition of countries to invade. I believe Iran and Syria will be the next wars to be sustained, with Pakistan already being taunted and assaulted without media coverage, we can be sure the military industrial complex is eager for a new set of wars and all the liberty stripping laws that go with them. Many signs evident leading up to previous wars in history are appearing today. War's a racket, and we're broke...
I wonder how much they need to pay Cameron for making another coalition of unwilling, Blair became a multi-millioner out of the last deal.
Interesting. I didn't know they paid him off. I always thought him to be the type to do it willingly.
look at all the high paying jobs that he is getting with Americans blessing and how much his net worth has increased since he joined the coalition of unwilling.
yeah right this is Conservative party but anyway Liberals are in cabinet too. hope England doesn't join coalition if they want to attack Iran, it can make the war longer ! in Iraq war Britain couldn't inter Basra even after American occupied Baghdad! see this link to know how much our president smart is! http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/the-iranian-presidents-geography-lesson/
Babak I was referring to Blair in that post. He is an evil, weasal-like creature, that is why I imagined him to jump at the chance of invading countries. Anyway, it doesn't look good for Britain keeping out of any future wars. Cameron has been scrutinised for stating that it is a "fact" that Iran has a nuclear weapon. Has he not learned from his predecessor? Heh what am I saying, politicians stick to a script.
Most likely he has already got some promises regarding future jobs and payments after he has finished as puppet minister.
yeah you right Blair has great ambition for himself but guess in some how he was better than Cameron. I guess Cameron is somewhat young and unpredictable.
The only difference between Blair and Cameron is the party banner they fly; both bought out politicians, both traitorous scum.
Are you calling Britons Idiots for electing them? Or are you one of those guys who'll bash the leaders they elect right from day one no matter what?!