US Marine: I Was Ordered to Execute Women and Children

Right, Finally.

 

The reason we have psychologists is because people with the actual problem just don't see it & they can't admit they have a problem you're a prime example, someone needs to diagnose them

 

Stox, you have some really big balls to be throwing around the phrase "lack of intelligence".


Instead of linking directly to my post, why don't ya link to the thread? Oh right, because then there would be context and you would still look like a jackass.

 

The context is provided in the question you quoted. You were answering that question, were you not?

 

The military as never raped anyone, how can hundreds of thousands of troops rape one girl simultaneously? or are you saying they ran a train on her?

 

Which is why i included the words "...that rape and murder a 14 year old girl". Are you still having trouble with this simple concept? Seriously, Lorien had the brains, And decency, To stop talking and disappear a long time ago, We are now reduced to suffering your constant and consistent inability to handle a simple sentence that has only 15 words in it, 9 of which you can't seem to muster the energy to read.

 

You do not need to school me. I speak and write English as well as most natives.

Let me use the words you wrote and teach you some basics:

''Answer this, Simply yes or no. Are you proud of your military that rapes and murders 14 year old girls? I bet you don't answer.''

The soldier who raped and murdered the girl is not the property of anybody here. He is not attached to anybody here. Saying ''your military'' suggests that. You are clearly referring to the US military when you say ''your military.'' If you really did not mean that, as you now claim, then you should improve your English and make your questions clearer. Also, why would you think that people approve of killing and raping a 14 year old?

If the question were only asking about the soldier, it should have been something like this: Are you proud of the soldier who killed that 14 year old girl? Trust me, everybody would answer (making you lose the bet,) and nobody would answer ''yes.'' Nobody would ''think'' that you are referring to the whole military. Also, when you talk about one case, as you claim you are, you should not use the plural form. You said ''14 year old girls.'' This alone means that you are talking about the whole military, and that the military kills '''14 year old girls'' all the time.

No buddy, you did not refer to that one case. You generalized, and you meant it. If you really did not, then you should work on your English. Trust me, it is not about a superior ability to ask questions. It is about an inferior ability to structure questions, or about trying to cover a mistake up.

 

Lorien gave up trying to teach a stubborn person basics in English.

 

No i didn't you liar.

Look at this.
"do you like dogs that bite?"
"do you like racist police?"

Those questions obviously aren't referring to all dogs or all police because it clearly only refers to dogs that bit and racist police. Just like my question clearly is referring to the military that rapes and kills children.

 

Good break down of a loaded question.

That's what these liberal types do. Take one incident and impose "collective guilt" to further their own agenda.

 

Are these questions referring to all police and all dogs?
"do you like dogs that bite?"
"do you like racist police?"

 

But your first question wasn't phrased in that manner at all, if i rephrased what your saying about the police but put it in a manner you used before i would put:

"do you support the police force that are racists?"

 

I wonder how many more pages it will take for:
A. him to accept correction in grammar
B. him to admit he meant what it says at face value (The military and not a soldier)
or
C. he gives up and hides

 

It still couldn't mean all of them because it specifically pinpoints what parts of it I'm talking about. Seriously, This is basic stuff. How can it possibly be referring to all of them when it specifically mentions the ones that commit a certain act? It's impossible that i was referring to all of the military.

 

It will take many more pages.

Yes. The question was loaded.

 

It may have been loaded, Still doesn't mean you have an excuse for entirely failing to understand what it means. All that means is you should think of a good answer, Doesn't look like you are capable of that either. You could have said "no", And then explained it. Unless you think i have some kind of ruling power over you and that if i tell you to do something you have to do it.

 

O.K. You have admitted it was loaded. In a trial, an attorney objects to loaded questions. Because to answer is a "no win" situation.
.

 

How do you explain something away when you request an answer with yes or no only!

You basically admit the question you asked was loaded (see above in red text) then refuse to allow explainations of answers, either way the answer was doomed & so was your question from the outset.

Now admit you was wrong

 

Oh yeah. That was a "yes or no" question.

 

So you are saying i have control over you and you have to do exactly what i say?

See now you are making excuses for not being able to answer a question that made sense with the defence that it was "loaded".