Not problem Just glad you can accept my suggestive input and hopefully integrate it some time in the future. Rob
I'm not sure that this approach isn't a bit backwards. Shouldn't content drive design rather than the other way around? As to the comment that there are only so many ways to describe a website...oh, such a short-sighted view. Forget the net for a minute and think about the advertising you've seen in print magazines. Many of the advertisements are for basically the same goods and services yet the ads have very different marketing messages and they certainly have different presentations. Now, consider the website in your portfolio that you are most proud of. If you wanted to sell it on the open market wouldn't you need more than 300-500 characters to describe it to a potential buyer? I think part of why web directories are falling somewhat out of favor is that too many still see them as just a list of links. Even the hand-edited ones aren't much more than that. Web 2.0 features and modern templates just make the lists look nicer but as a rule don't add much usefulness. Perhaps if directory owners/designers started thinking more like researchers and less like review-sellers there would be some true innovation with directories.