Unique content Generators can do it ?

Hahahaha! SEO has become a life and death matter to many these days!!!

 

If they can't make own content then they can buy unique content or copypaste free content.

 

Why not just write articles and try blogging. Isn't that the proper way to generate good deep linking? Well I guess if you try all methods it in theory will give you some great results.

Erick

 

Yes, that is definitely a good way to go, but the reason content generators are popular is they save time if you're maintaining a large number of sites.

 

save you money but could get your entire site banned from goolge or even your adsense account suspended. All it takes is one person to report you to google for stealing content. I'll point it out again... google take this very seriously...

http://www.google.com/dmca.html

I have used it before and the writers that work for me have as well.

 

rewriting does not mean you can violate others copyright. the meaning of rewriting is: you can get very cheap PLR contents from membership sites, you have the copyright! then after rewriting, you have your own unique content!

why google ban this? will google ban this?

 

hmmmm..im sensing some blackhat here.. i know someone who used to own about 100 domains, all content generated and yet..google has a so called "footprint trace technology" that tracks similar sites using these content generators and once Google Bot finds it out..the whole site network get BANNED!

 

It is a device to deceive the search engines... No Doubt.

There are however many sites out there that utilize existing duplicated content in useful and valuable ways. Some sites bring together resources from many areas ( often open source ) pertaining to specific subjects and are actually more convenient, interesting, user friendly and appealling than the boring data sites that are the original source.

 

If you break any copyright the original writer can get your site banned as well as your adsense account banned. If you have permission from the original author to modify the content then this is fine.

 

take a look at the results of your sites with :
http://www.copyscape.com/

you will see that automated content can be recognized and i am sure google can do it too. regarding content. they recognize duplicated terms even if there is a word between.

try www.rentacoder.com and buy yourself original articles in $4 -$8 each. easy .

 

wether people like it or not, there is some complete junk out there which ranks very well, even tho it makes little to no sense. Often you dont even realise you have come across this stuff because the pages use sneaky redirects to send you straight to the affiliate. I personally havent used the article spinners but i do know people who swear by them.

i ran across this site in google today ranking for the phrase "lost series"

lost-series-synopsis.restaurant-labellavita.be

if you have javascript on it bounces you straight to the affiliate or another spam page but when you turn javascript off you see the actual page. it doesnt make any sense at all and yet google is perfectly happy to index it. If this is what a bad spinner can achieve then imagine what a good one can do.

 

PLR means you can change it without asking permission from creaters.

 

Make sure your using PLR... for instance many people may think free article directories are PLR. Here is a good little piece on PLR.

http://ezinearticles.com/blog/archives/2006/02/fair_use_vs_plr.html

 

1. you violate the copyright
2. they generate garbage
3. content should be for users. You'll earn more if users return to ur site, and obiously they wont if they are unable to READ your site

 

My advice to anyone using a content generator is this -

a) Use articles you're allowed to use. You can spin thousands of articles from 1, so there's no reason to steal - there's plenty out there.

b) Bury these pages. YOU need to be writing the important copy on your site. If it's supposed to be selling or informative, don't use a generated copy. Bury the generated pages in your site for google and if people get to them, get them to the pages that were written by a human fast.

c) Spend a little time on them to make sure they're up to snuff and sound good.

Anyone can ask me any questions about what I've found useful with these over PM (or here for that matter)

 

1. you violate the copyright
if PLR content, you did not violate it; for some free content, as long as you follow authors instruction, you did not violate;

2. they generate garbage
not really. if you take some time to polish the generated content, you can get high quality content. it really depends on how you use it;

3. content should be for users. You'll earn more if users return to ur site, and obiously they wont if they are unable to READ your site
no, same as 2).

if you want click a button, then get rewritten good-quality content, no software can do this now.

 

People using generated content remind me of those kids I knew in college who bought their term papers online and went partying while the rest of us stayed home to write. The problem is, when you try to cut corners, you usually end up with garbage. And even if you're lucky and get something good, I still think it's pretty unethical. But maybe I'm just bitter because I look bad in black?

 

Somebody has tested these things in this thread.

I got good results using the google translation tool as well.