Unique content Generators can do it ?

i do not know about it well but i am guessing it will change contents from rss source and somehow make them appear "unique" ..

 

You miss my point, people that can do anything to make money doesn't deserve hands.

 

cmon man, aren't you being a little dramatic? Just because someone buries some auto generated pages in their site so Google will give them a little more love doesn't mean that:

a) their site is less worthy than yours (it could be a better resource, with better content and more info for the surfer)
and
b) they don't deserve hands

Please explain how I'm wrong

 

Alot of these are designed to take PLR articles and modify it to make it different from someone else who may have purchased the same PLR articles. Yes I'm sure it will be abused but for those that buy content for their site this is about the only quick way to ensure your article is "unique" from the hundreds of other copies out there.

 

How unique these scripts make them is debatable though.

 

The output of these applications is usually dreadful and obvious. They end up creating phrases that people would never actually write- especially embarassing when they choke on an idiom.

 

imho, if there is a software that exists, it will be somehow again "cloned" and copied.

 

I am willing to try out your tool. Do you have sample. Would you be able to run your tool on one conent page I have (to test)

Thanks

 

If you take an article written by someone else, and change it around, it is not unique content.
Just content that has been changed around a bit.
Something like when we were in school and took a crib sheet and changed words around.
The teachers were hip to this and boy, the F's flew around the classroom!
So if the teachers were hip, what makes anyone think google is not hip?

Either write your own unique content from scratch, pay someone to write for you, or just find good articles at article directories and use them withouth changing them.

All programs and software that take an article and change it around are useless and only fools, noobies and peons would waste their money buying such programs and software.

 

My $0.02:

I totally agree with you on this. As a matter of fact, I was reading the forum at the site providing the software in question, and the admin said that the program is very similar to Article Bot. Not only that, the suckers who've already purchased the software are having quite a few problems with it beyond the fact that their getting crappy content. I work for an SEO / linkbuilding company during the day, and we wont even sell you links if you are using something as crappy as Article Bot for your content. Machine generated content is garbage pure and simple, and will rarely pass through copyscape.com as unique anyways. Write your own content or hire a writer like iowadawg said.

 

What makes me think Google's not hip? Eh - the affiliate checks that come from my content generated sites.

The problem here is that we're dealing with semantics of quality and "uniqueness". It is absolutely true that machine generated content often sounds like someone with English as a second language wrote it.

But have any of you guys read the internet lately? Thanks to blogs, there's more crap than ever on the web - the majority of it written by humans. As for it not passing as "unique", you're completley wrong. I've had sites up for months, making money with content created with generators.

In my opinion, the absolute best way to use software like this is to keep your human written content for your outer pages and bury the ones that are written with a generator. In the end, its just a means to an ends.

And iowadog - last time I checked Google's not an english teacher nor a human - so useless analogy.

Hehe, and I must be all 3 - newbie, peon and fool. Because I use the software, love it and have made a goodly sum of money from my sites that use it.

 

Well more people clicks on the ads if the article are less usefull. Therefore, those with contentgenerators will make big money while spamming the net.

 

I think you guys misunderstood the rewriting software. Of course, software can not reallt rewrite a general topic article. Technology is not there yet. However, not everybody is good at rewriting. Software can provide a base for users to start with. Especially when you have many PLR articles every month, software rewriting can save you lots of time. If you design the Macro/Export Template carefully, the rewriting articles are not very bad. We only need take some time to polish it. There is some value in it, isn't it?

Of course, if you only have several sites that need content, you can manage it by yourself, then you do not need rewriting software. But many guys have tens, even hundreds sites. They need this kind of software.

Temp

 

I use Synonymizer to produce huge lists of keyword phrases and paragraphs. It can also produce modified text starting from long writings. If you start from copyrighted sources, you might approach the plagiarism limit. Otherwise, it will produce legitimate, non-duplicated material.

 

Absolutely. And if you're worried about closing in on plagiarism, spend a couple minutes and write the seed article yourself.

 

Which is exactly what some of these programs are doing, not actually re-writing the content but replacing words thorughout the articel, breaking up the strings that will trigger the dupe fileter even in Copyscape, thus making the article "unique" yet still readable...not a bunch of generated gibberish.

 

I don't have a problem with people using software like this. It kills their credibility, which is great for the rest of us. If your main goal is just SEO bots, then use em. I am sure they do a fantastic job. If you use it on content that you don't already own, you are almost assuredly violating copyright and plagiarizing to the hilt. Taking someones work and changing some of the words is still plagiarism.

However, if your goal is to build users, a brand and a company, this stuff makes you look like a moron (just look at the examples from the software makers). Like it or not, your use of the English language, or lack thereof, will be a major factor in your success with the English speaking crowd. This is why major companies look for people with solid communication skills and list it as one of their most important factors for hiring.

 

if you do this to others content, it is a kind of plagiarism. HOWEVER, if you use it for PLR articles and POLISH a little bit of the output content, it is NOT plagiarism. It is a quick way to get good quality contents.

It depends on how you use it, it could be a good solution.



Temp

 

yes exactly , it will be very time consuming.

 

While I do agree with you that your use of language/communication is extremely important when selling products or services to clients, I don't really think you can completely draw the conclusion that you're "ruining you web business" by using a content generator.

As we all know, selling on the internet involves two factors.
1) Getting traffic
2) Monetizing that traffic

Your point stands unopposed when it comes to monetizing traffic. There is no substitute for clear communication. But getting traffic through the SEs has almost NOTHING to do with clear communication (unless of course you're writing an ad). Google can't understand meaning. So what you communicate to the search engines is either:

a) you are relevant to the keyword
OR
b) you are not relevant to the keyword.

In my opinion, this is what content generators should be used for. Not your site's index page .