You're right - we better get in there now and stop them. Essentially, letting terrorists get hold of a nuclear bomb is a bad idea...
Is this the same way that you stopped North Korea or Iraq? May be because it is counter productive to USA's national interests.
Not for gworld. He seems to support terrorists having nuclear weapons rather openly. Looks like one of gworld's buds has changed sides
Hey, commando -- sorry if I got you upset, but you don't have to be rude. Yes, I know, this is the internet and you can say what you want. I am sorry I ever responded to what is nothing less than an empty thread.
Hummm no there is difference between upset and disgusted ... you need a lot more effort to upset me ...
Germany in the 1st world war used WMD "Gas" on uk troops like you was told, stop trying to score brownie points by trying to say it was the USA. no it wasnt.
You cant say anything you want, its so easy to be watched and tracked down, you'll never know....(xfiles music starts)....
when the nuke debate came about, it was agreed that the nations that had them can keep them, but not make any more than the numbers they had, in fact to get rid of some old ones they made the figure a little lower then they already had. the ones they were left with, are allowed to be replaced, because of the deterrent value they have. so the UK is just replacing some older ones with newer once, we will still have the same amount. when the old ones are scrapped. as for nutters having them, well not a chance. they shouldn't have them. they will just make the world more unstable as it is. as to Iran, it's simple, improve your human rights and neighborhood relations and you have nothing to worry about.
You did understand what i meant ... And i think if my notes are correct , first to use biological attack were the english when they left infected carpet (Variole (french word)) No country should have these weapon , I'm really proud to live in Canada ... They don't have any WMD , nor plan to have or use .
Variole? I've never heard of that before. You mean Smallpox? Wash your mouth out - there's no way Britain would every develop such a nasty and heinous weapon
yes 10x to wikipedia ..its smallpox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox http://www.wnyc.org/books/45432
ah well ya got me there, 1700's huh? sure took the rest of the world some time to catch up, i wonder where the brits involved in the spanish Syphilis epidemic a few hundred years earlier naaaa sorry cant pin that on them