I'm not suggestion anything. The report says that the submarines trident-class are currently changed from nuclear warheads into conventional rockets and that this would be hopefully finished in time. Also using B2-bomber to attack their facilities "Central Command" and "Strategic Command" were recently given order to do so - reports "Sunday Telegraph" No coalition-forces either The world can't continue to play their games with them forever. Irans Ahmadinedschad threatened yesterday, though not directly, to cancel the nuclear treaty agreement if the west doesn't give up to let them have it the way they want it. Yes, and not to forget he also mentioned that the Russians may not be reliable and that they have no guarantee , so its out of question for them. I assume they jugde this situation based on their own mindset So at least you agree with my comment and don't forget that there is more to it then just wishful thinking. 1. I hate force of any kind perhaps more then you do, but when there is no choice, what to do? 2. The planned attacks are not aimed at people but their nuclear facilities. I can live with that Hamid Ali the spirutell leader of the mosque in West Yorkshire has first contemned the attacks in London and now praises the terrorists as heroes. Under-cover reporters have recorded his speeches and praises for the terrorists secretly and informed british "Times" Looks like another proof for islamis double standards ...and today, hamas has threatened Israel with total destruction. I better don't post the words of hamas speaker Muschir al-Masri, find out by yourself and come back and post here. ...and while you're at it check out the most recent speeches about Isreal from this culprit as shown above. He not only looks like he is a personification of Satan The speech was held yesterday Maybe, and as a last ditch attempt to help avoid the worst its time to visit iranian embassies worldwide with massive demonstrations. this guy is 100 times as venomous as the most venomous snake.
Yeah right, they are very bad as Isreal has always been offering bouquets of roses to palestiniens Isn't sharon too a terrorist as he had threatened to Kill Arafat ? http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1202273,00.html
So you are saying that we should pull out of Denmark? That that will somehow fix them? Or, should the Danes stay in Denmark, and just live there under Islamic rule? Do the Danes owe head tax for being non-Muslims?
umm yeah , we avoid crazy muslims were ever they are the danes should take care of there own problems, we have our own borders to take care off What are you babbling about? the Danes should police there own country, don't you think?
I don't know. You appear to be arguing that the Danes should not publish -- in Denmark -- documents that might offend Islamists. That certainly strikes me as odd. And, of course, you now appear to be arguing that "we avoid crazy muslims were ever they are". So, does that mean that Danish police should not try to enforce Danish law on Muslims who live in Denmark? Does that mean that American police should similarly avoid "crazy muslims" in America? Should American Muslims be subject only to Islamic law?
when I say "we" I mean the USA, I don't feel any real obligation to Denmark, personally I think anyone should publish anything they want, about whatever they want, and if someone is offended then fuck them Nope, if someone breaks a law where ever they are they should be taken care of by whatever police agency exists where ever they are. when I say "avoid crazy muslims were ever they are" I mean we shouldn't invade their countries, meddle in their politics, give them aid, trade with them, or buy their oil.
No, we kill them. Terrorists that is. To be PC. We're doing a pretty good job of that my friend. There has not been a single terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11. Can't really say the same of the previous administrations record. Apparently it is above you since you are beyond reason Looks to me like they are.
Should we allow people from Islamic countries to travel and/or emigrate to the U.S.? Should these restrictions on foreign trade be mandated by the government, like we do with Cuba? Or, should they be voluntary, like many people do with France?
oh please, I just posted a picutre of the pope using the n-word, it its not technically the n-word, the n word is nigger, the word the pope was using is nigga, which is more similiar to the slang "dude" You got me, I'm not a fan of muslim culture, I don't really care if that makes me bigotted, I don't like any system of goverment based on superstitions, yes I would consider some Iraqis pretty crazy Muslims. I don't know I would have to read more about it, I don't really agree with the restrictions on Cuba, and hope fidel will shit the bed soon so that opens up, Cubans keep landing down the road from where I live, its kind of werid. The Saudis are probalby still some of the biggest financers of Muslim Extremists, I don't we have done much to them , have we. Pretty much if some country wants to burn stuff down in its country over cartoons, then that is that countries problem isn't it.
Some depending on who they are, and what they can offer the US, and in very limited numbers, probably not unsuperviced student visas were some takes one class and disappears into the masses
There's many good people from those countries too. Even amongs those that was offended by the cartoons.
Thing is that US will be islamic anyway in a near future due to the fact that islamic famillies have more kids(up to 4-6) while normal americans have usually have 1-4
Yes, we all know that latehorn. However, the questions is in regards to "people from Islamic countries", not "Muslims." We can tell what country a person immigrates from, we cannot as easily determine their religion. Remember, there are Christians and even some Jews in most Middle Eastern Islamic countries.