typosquatting - question

Discussion in 'Domain Names' started by isd, Nov 24, 2006.

  1. #1
    Hello every one,
    i was trying to say hello in introduction but i couldnt post (now i realase i need to mark "I believe..." be4 posting)
    ok then, so greatings from spain to every one!

    question:
    it is illegal to buy domain name similar to somecompanyname-sucs.com?,
    i know this is called typosquatting and is maybe not ethical but it is really illegal?
    if the company really sucs every one?
    can i have problems if i do so? (the company is situated in us [or they say so] and im in europe), how big the chance to be penalize will be, if i install free forums in somecompanyname-sucks.com
    please leave your opinions
    thank you
    isd
     
    isd, Nov 24, 2006 IP
  2. forumrating

    forumrating Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,565
    Likes Received:
    347
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #2
    somecompany-sucs ur straigh away insulting the company at 1st
    you are using their company name , if they have a copyright, patent, trademark, they can sue you properly.

    surely keeping such domains is welcome to problems
     
    forumrating, Nov 24, 2006 IP
  3. isd

    isd Member

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    43
    #3
    i know, and this is my point about typosquatting, we also do insult many times in our posts...
    isd
     
    isd, Nov 24, 2006 IP
  4. eukhost

    eukhost Banned

    Messages:
    911
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I think this won't be a case of typosquatting. Typosquatting is purchasing a variation of a popular domain with the intention of getting traffic off the original site because of a user's misspelling of the name.

    In this case it's not a misspelling but a suffix, so if the company's name is Trademarked then I would suggest you to stay away from such a name.
     
    eukhost, Nov 24, 2006 IP
  5. forumrating

    forumrating Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,565
    Likes Received:
    347
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #5
    certainly then its not a case of typos,
    typos are just mistype words
    here the entire company name comes up in the domain.
     
    forumrating, Nov 24, 2006 IP
  6. ReadyToGo

    ReadyToGo Peon

    Messages:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Kind of off topic, but wouldn't the person who owns goggle be subject to some sort of a typosquatting suit then?
     
    ReadyToGo, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  7. MKInfo

    MKInfo DP Guard Dog

    Messages:
    1,481
    Likes Received:
    97
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #7
    Thats my newly bought googlefire.com out of the window then:(
     
    MKInfo, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  8. ReadyToGo

    ReadyToGo Peon

    Messages:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    That seems like a TM issue then.
     
    ReadyToGo, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  9. eukhost

    eukhost Banned

    Messages:
    911
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    goggle.com would be considered a case of typosquatting as it's a misspelling of the original domain google.com. While in case of googlefire.com it would be a Trademark issue as it's not a misspelling but the Trademarked word in the domain.
     
    eukhost, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  10. isd

    isd Member

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    43
    #10
    ok, thank you for you opinion guys,
    but then if i run something like companies-which-sucks.com should be ok?
    what you say then?
    thank you for your opinion

    all this is about companies like for example; registerfly which every one knows they are not trastable and tiffs, and few others similar (sister webs)
    isd
     
    isd, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  11. Dave Zan

    Dave Zan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #11
    The question here isn't whether this domain name or that is ok or a typo. The
    real question here is what is your intent.

    If you intend to commercially benefit by riding on a party's trademark rights,
    then expect trouble. It doesn't matter how slightly different your domain name
    is as long as it's possibly infringing it.
     
    Dave Zan, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  12. isd

    isd Member

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    43
    #12
    oh no dave, im not intenting to take benefits is oposit i want to run site especially to warn peapole of the companies like i mentioned above, so it is oposit what are u thinking: i will put my time, some money (eaven just to buy domain name) and my work to do everything posible to f. they business.
    i know there is many forums andmany places where can i post to do my review, but simple review is not enough 4 me, what i really want is give them good time...
    isd
     
    isd, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  13. ReadyToGo

    ReadyToGo Peon

    Messages:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Is Google able to do something about it?
     
    ReadyToGo, Nov 25, 2006 IP
  14. Dave Zan

    Dave Zan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #14
    If they so choose to. They do have the financial muscle, after all.
     
    Dave Zan, Nov 26, 2006 IP
  15. Narrator

    Narrator Active Member

    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #15
    goggle is a real word and the website is in no way related to google so they would never have a case. It is just a coincidence that the people really want to go to google. If the site was an imaginary word like googl then google would have a case.
     
    Narrator, Nov 26, 2006 IP