1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Trump's inauguration ceremony had one of the largest crowds ever

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by qwikad.com, Jan 20, 2017.

  1. Bushranger

    Bushranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,784
    Likes Received:
    209
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    SEMrush
  2. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    24,258
    Likes Received:
    3,262
    Best Answers:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    615
    #22
    It's getting funnier by the day. I hope it all goes well but I'm so glad I don't live up there.
     
    sarahk, Jan 26, 2017 IP
    Bushranger and jrbiz like this.
  3. jrbiz

    jrbiz Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #23
    I have been saying for quite some time now that I believe that we are in for a economic boom (and not just the U.S.) similar to or perhaps exceeding the Reagan economic boom of the 1980's. And it is not just because the Dow Jones has hit a historic high of 20,000+ since Trump's inauguration. It is because all of the other ingredients are in place, too. Much like with Reagan and Carter, Trump's predecessor was an idiot socialist who not only hurt business via over-regulation, taxation and other stupid policies, but went well beyond that to demoralize the "makers" that have built the country while exalting the "takers" who are mostly just leeches. Of course, the Alinsky-ite, Obama, had eight years instead of four to wreak his damage. There is now a pent up "demand" in the business community (especially in small businesses which are the real engines of job growth) to start growing, investing, etc. With the repeal of Obamacare, slowing down the loonies at the EPA, and other such activities, the outlook is getting brighter and brighter. And, I see it on the ground right now, just like my sales teams and I saw the discouragement, fear, and disgust that these CEO's exhibited when Obama started his demonization of the corporate world immediately after taking office.

    Circling back to Internet Marketing, if ever there was a time to invest in and/or plan for a growth economy, this is it.
     
    jrbiz, Jan 27, 2017 IP
  4. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    5,483
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    400
    #24
    3 mil in illegal votes is a huge number, considering the size of the US population (~345 mil). But even that didn't help the dems.

    [​IMG] Donald J. Trump‏@realDonaldTrump
    Look forward to seeing final results of VoteStand. Gregg Phillips and crew say at least 3,000,000 votes were illegal. We must do better!

    I've seen a spike already.
     
    qwikad.com, Jan 27, 2017 IP
    grpaul and jrbiz like this.
  5. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    5,483
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    400
    #25
    It's a lie. There's NO evidence. Do you understand that the pic on the left was taken while the people were still gathering earlier that morning? You're posting a regurgitated nonsense that has been disproved 10x over. The real evidence are the pics I showed at the top of the thread. The real evidence are the people who were there and witnessed the crowds. The problem is the media is a bunch of dishonest liars. @Bushranger why do you consciously want to be duped by them? In real life you would avoid or confront those who constantly distorted the truth or lied to you. And yet you voluntarily turn off your moral compass when it comes to the politics and the lying media. Why? How is it benefiting you?

     
    qwikad.com, Jan 27, 2017 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  6. jrbiz

    jrbiz Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #26
    Here's the real deal: historians all agree that the Daley political machine in 1960 won JFK that very close election by having about 100,000 dead people vote for him. Not millions, just a hundred thousand. This has been well-documented and is not in dispute. During one of the recent presidential elections, a big Chicago Democratic donor was convicted of bribing homeless people in the city to vote with cartons of cigarettes. One Democratic operative in NY was secretly video-taped in 2016 bragging about busing fraudulent voters around to multiple polling places to help their cause. Obviously, even smaller numbers of fraud can have an effect as evidenced by the 1960's election and the continuing efforts of the leftists to keep doing more of the same. If it was not worthwhile, these power-hungry leftists would spend their time and energy on other more productive election activities. The fact that they continue with these nefarious activities and start howling in wild protest any time conservatives try to simply require ID's to vote tells me that they believe that voter fraud has been and continues to be at least somewhat effective for them. It is about time that this issue is addressed.
     
    jrbiz, Jan 27, 2017 IP
    grpaul likes this.
  7. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    210
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #27
    I actually believe the numbers were way above what everyone is claiming, but honestly who cares at this point. . . The leftist whiny babies are just looking for ways to claim some sort of "win", ease their pain and/or create distractions. One of those distractions being that they got their a** kicked in this election.

    President Trump has already started doing great things.
     
    grpaul, Jan 27, 2017 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  8. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    24,258
    Likes Received:
    3,262
    Best Answers:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    615
    #28
    1960!

    FFS

    You've had 56 years to sort this problem out. Computers exist, you have SSN, you have access to the best technology in the world and you can't even run an election properly?
     
    sarahk, Jan 27, 2017 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  9. jrbiz

    jrbiz Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #29
    No, because the Democrats have fiercely fought voter registration reform at every turn by making the bogus claim that requiring identification (as is required to buy cigarettes, buy alcohol, get into a nightclub, cash a check, get SSI benefits, drive a car, etc., etc.) is too onerous and will unfairly prevent some people from voting. To that, I say if someone is so intimidated or put out by the need to get an ID (provided free in many cases), they probably shouldn't be voting, anyway. But, the reality is that the Democrats have been caught participating in voter fraud over the decades and have effectively pooh-poohed electoral fraud and otherwise obstructed all efforts to do something because they like things just the way they are.
     
    jrbiz, Jan 27, 2017 IP
  10. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    24,258
    Likes Received:
    3,262
    Best Answers:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    615
    #30
    But you've still stood by for 56 years and let your representatives behave that way. If that really was the case people would have forced the change from the ground up. You can't go throwing your weight around in other people's democracies and "supervise elections" if you have no confidence in your own.
     
    sarahk, Jan 27, 2017 IP
  11. jrbiz

    jrbiz Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #31
    It is generally just "noise" when it comes to the mathematics of the majority of elections. However, it can have an impact on close races and also with local/state level elections.

    I am not sure what other elections we are monitoring, but I would be the first to tell us to take care of business here and worry about other countries later, if ever. And, by the way, that is exactly what Trump is doing with his call for an investigation which the lamestream media is poking fun at as hard as they can because they appear to be really scared about this one.
     
    jrbiz, Jan 27, 2017 IP
  12. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    24,258
    Likes Received:
    3,262
    Best Answers:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    615
    #32
    If he was just saying "Hey, there's a problem, lets tackle it" there would be no derision.
    The problem is that he's crowing about numbers and his popularity and how he is so fucking "great" the whole time so his investigation is tainted.
     
    sarahk, Jan 27, 2017 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  13. Bushranger

    Bushranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,784
    Likes Received:
    209
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #33
    Are you claiming even PBS is corrupted media too? The article I posted needed no comment. It showed picture after picture pointing out the obvious lies, even a time-lapse covering the day. It plainly shows the evidence that the crowds were much smaller than the Trump camp claimed.

    Look at all that white space behind the crowd and before the monument. Your picture is no different than the ones being spread around, just a lower angle.

    I follow the evidence as always, and the evidence points to Trump being a narcissistic liar.

    I mean, even the site where you got your images from says the Trump camp lied.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/inauguration-crowd-size/514058/

    Please feel free to post other evidence.

    You're the one turning off your moral compass by not following the actual evidence.
     
    Bushranger, Jan 27, 2017 IP
  14. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    210
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #34
    LOL.........
     
    grpaul, Jan 28, 2017 IP
  15. jrbiz

    jrbiz Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #35
    Like any super-successful businessperson or politician, he has a monstrous ego. Nothing new with him versus his predecessors in this regard. The difference, of course, is that he speaks his mind openly and unabashedly and that is one of the things that his supporters like about him. He says it all, good, bad, and ugly. For the sheeple and snowflakes who prefer to be bamboozled by focus-group-filtered words, fake news, etc., Trump is very disconcerting and they should probably ignore his words and pay more attention to his actions. Overshadowed by the lamestream media's focus and distortion of those words are his wide array of forceful actions already underway. He is moving quickly and with a purpose and unlike any president in my lifetime.

    By the way, Trump is masterfully using this crowd-size issue (which is so unimportant as to be silly) to continue his effort to paint the lamestream media as the liars that they have been for decades. While the media goes off on wild goose chases to prove the size of the crowd and tarnish Trump with his supporters (which has not worked for two years and counting,) Trump is moving forward with so many meaningful activities that it is breathtaking this early in his administration.
     
    jrbiz, Jan 28, 2017 IP
  16. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    210
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #36
    This is exactly how they lost - by focusing on things that don't matter. The crowd issue is completely irrelevant at this point.

    To see/hear Clinton followers continuing to call Trump a narcissist is sad and pathetic.

    The Clinton's are the picture perfect narcissist, conniving couple - but they get a pass.
     
    grpaul, Jan 28, 2017 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  17. jrbiz

    jrbiz Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    4,084
    Likes Received:
    1,541
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #37
    How about the rapist/lecher, Bill, being a hero of the feminists and their lackeys in the lamestream media? Had Bill addressed the Woman's March (ostensibly due to their hate for Trump's treatment of women) they would have swooned, of course. The left is constantly exposed for the hypocrites and liars that they are. The lamestream media has dutifully toed their line in this regard. Now, for the first time in my lifetime (and I am as old as dirt) they are being called on it and know not what to do.
     
    jrbiz, Jan 28, 2017 IP
  18. Bushranger

    Bushranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,784
    Likes Received:
    209
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #38
    So unimportant that a whole thread was dedicated to it eh? Was it important until the first post pointing out obvious contradictory evidence and now that the actual evidence shows the opposite is true now it's insignificant?

    Masterful HaHaHa, Was that sarcasm? You shouldn't pick an event with so much contradictory evidence to use as a cause celebre against media lies. That wasn't masterful in the slightest, in fact it was pretty stupid.
     
    Bushranger, Jan 28, 2017 IP
  19. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    210
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #39
    Bitter much? This is purely semantics, commenting on it as being "important", is - very stupid.

    But, this is exactly what Obama and Hillary would expect of you. So, well done.
     
    grpaul, Jan 28, 2017 IP
  20. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    5,483
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    400
    #40
    Ok, I can see now that you truly live in a parallel dimension. All I can say, you were wrong claiming that Hillary was going to win. You are just as wrong now.

     
    qwikad.com, Jan 28, 2017 IP
    grpaul likes this.