From the offices of W3C: Dear Mr. Fatinfo Guy With Deep regret we must Decline your application for 100% Seo certified Directory. Your website has Not passed http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...ctype=Inline&ss=1&outline=1&No200=1&verbose=1 Please try again and inform us when its 100% Respectfully W3C Staff Please Re Apply at a later Date....lol just kidding
Lol, your site fails too. Very tough pissing contest that no one can win. Hope you can get everything fixed till the next release. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...ctype=Inline&ss=1&outline=1&No200=1&verbose=1 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...ctype=Inline&ss=1&outline=1&No200=1&verbose=1 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...ctype=Inline&ss=1&outline=1&No200=1&verbose=1 Hmmm, all 3 of your sites failed at a 100% rate.
Hmmm ok Fixed and Done on the details but noticed a few in another part. Good looking out, wouldnt have caught them if not for the post. Now they are all three w3c validated on all pages. thx malcolm
I am more concern about if it is index friendly rather than the w3c compliance. Anyone who knows basic HTML can get their sites to validate, but not everyone can get their sites completely out of the supplemental index. And also check out how well the details pages rank. Fatinfo ranks extremely well. ie. search for "Become a Kissing Expert" lol.
I wish they had a tool that would tell you in ruff % how seo your site really is. Ive been searchin but havent found any yet. I agree about the w3c validation its not going to make google give you a pr9 but at least you know what youve got,.... more then the guy who didnt. thx malcolm
Wondering if you'd care to have another look and consider adding it back to your list. The issue we discussed via PM is resolved and we're able to include the description tag on the index page again. Thanks.
Great work. I have added the site back to the SEO Friendly Directories category. And congrats on the new pr