Like I said yesterday GTech, you would make a great comic with that material, but this is not a laughing matter as many are losing their lives over this oil war. In addition the world economy is being destroyed by this war. So even though you are funny, you can bet your ass that the American people are happy that John Kerry is still in Washington fighting for the American people against this Republican Gestapo. Guess what, I am sure glad he did not “win†so Bush can languish in his own cesspool that he and his Father created along with Cheney. I am sure John Kerry will sit on the panel that impeaches Bush
The only panel Kerry needs to be on, is the panel that convicts him of treason. Giving aid and comfort to our enemies. http://patriotpetitions.us/kerry/letter.asp Just because you say, and provide no evidence to substantiate (as usual) this is an oil war, doesn't make it so. It's not. But for as much as the likes of nut jobs suggest it is, with nothing to back it up, I do wish we were in fact getting some oil out of it. That way, we could benefit from low oil prices, which we are not. The world economy is not being destroyed. Every day on digital point is a reminder that free enterprise is alive and well. There are many people here making very good money. Unemployment rate here in the US is very low, especially compared to other countries. Just because you want the world economy to fail, the sky to fall and terrorists to prevail, doesn't mean everyone thinks the same. And just because you want your country to fail, doesn't mean others do.
That is nothing but a Republican propaganda link GTech, you have all of them. Now we are way off track talking about American politics instead of the UK Election, you knew this would happen because you Republicans sure have great hope that Blair gets re-elected since it will be a slap in the face of Bush if he loses I hope the British and the rest of the UK wake up because this is their chance to pay Bush back with the defeat of Tony Blair and the "Houston Oilmen's Association"
Anthony, Kerry was the worst choice for a Presidential nominee that the Democrats could have made and you have to admit them (I am greatful )
Actually, I just hope the Brits can vote for who they think will serve them best, without death threats, intimidation and bribery from the likes of the thugs I linked to on page one of this topic. As far as waking up, I'm sure they (and other countries) are taking notice of how Holland woke up after the Theo van Gogh murder. In that context, I agree. It's time to wake up.
I have read about van Gogh's murder, an outspoken journalist and decendent of Vincent Van Gogh. It is so funny how people feel safe just because they are not being threatened and then wake up. Tony Blaire is smart enough to see the potential dangers in the future and Brits can caall themselves blessed to have a guy who is not afraid to run against the wind. Popular opinion is not always what is best for a nation.
I was too. I was particularly surprised at the "in your face" effort the MSN went to, to hide kerry's treasonous past. Even more so, that some actually told their reporters to give kerry more favorable coverage than Bush. In the end, it was sweet victory. Knowing the likes of George Soros couldn't buy an election, that CBS couldn't forge documents and fabricate a story to bring him down, that the NYT couldn't get a grip on their weapons story the week before and that the media all but gave kerry a free pass, made me realize that the Amercan people are not as gullible as the MSM wishes they were. And perhaps the sweetest victory was, that Terry McAnger (McAuliffe) failed twice. He'll go down as one of the most non-infuential nut jobs the DNC ever employed.
First off anyone that feels safe with Bush as President should go serve in Iraq, TOOT you never answered when I asked if you would replace some of the women sent there because they joined the National Guard to work one weekend a month but were sold down the river by Bush and sent to the front lines. Second, this election was stolen just like the one in 2000 by fraud in Ohio (Diebold voting machines and Ohio Republicans counting votes in 2004). So TOOT you are wrong on both counts. Bush never won either election but was inserted by corruption in the system and everyone knows this. You both have your heads in the sand as did those who voted for Richard Nixon twice. I just hope our friends in the UK defeat suck ass Tony Blair and give Bush what he deserves.
I understand that the truth hurts you GTech, the economy crashing, record oil prices, Bush begging old folks to give up Social Security because he bankrupted the government, record trade and budget deficits, a weak dollar that causes inflation and generally the Republican party not wanting to associate with their own President because of the Iraq disaster I completely understand GTech
Again, only in your small reality. Add a little aluminum foil on the left side and pinch the upper right hand corner. Your reality will come back!
There's very little truth to anything you post. I've read often that liberalism is a disease, and perhaps you can't help these weird thoughts that come into your mind and take the side of our enemies. Here, start with these: economy crashing record oil prices Bush begging old folks to give up Social Security because he bankrupted the government And when you get through, you can explain why you want your country to fail so bad.
Each of those things are reality GTech, they are all common knowledge Pull your head out of the Republican PR Fog and you might be able to read current events
If you apply the same effort to your work, as you do backing up your statements with that response, it's no wonder you can't make any money!
So you are saying that you never were aware of record oil prices then GTech, or the record budget and trade deficits, or the Social Security Issue, or the stock market and consumer confidence numbers droping for the 3rd month in a row, or record drops in manufactuing indexes
Not in the context's you presented above. After all, if "Bush begging old folks to give up Social Security because he bankrupted the government" is common knowledge, you shouldn't have any trouble finding a *credible* source to substantiate your position. Something with a little more effort than a predefined search string to vivizimo.
If things are so good GTech, why is GM going broke and losing market share? http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002246706_gm20.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Also look at this report, Bush is affecting every aspect of the economy with his RECORD OIL PRICES, GM can't sell cars and Trucks and SUV's all of a sudden GTech and homes are not selling as well either because of the slowdown, makes you wonder why Bush wants old folks to give up their retirements now GTech U.S. housing starts fall sharply in March Decline by 17.6%, largest since Jan. 1991 By Greg Robb, MarketWatch Last Update: 9:37 AM ET April 19, 2005 WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Construction of new houses in the U.S. fell 17.6% in March, the biggest drop in over 14 years, the Commerce Department estimated Tuesday. Housing starts fell to a seasonally adjusted 1.837 million annualized units. The drop was much larger than expected. Economists were looking for starts to fade to 2.09 million. See Economic Calendar February's new construction was revised higher to 2.229 million from the 2.195 million level reported last month. This was the highest rate of housing starts in 21 years. Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, said investors should resist the temptation to argue that the drop in March housing starts represents the serious slowing in housing activity. "Starts have been inexplicably elevated relative to new home sales in the past couple of months and this drop represents a correction," he said. But other economists weren't so sure. Drew Matus, economist at Lehman Brothers, noted that the April Home Builders sentiment index fell to its lowest level in seven months in April on Monday. "This raises concerns about housing-related growth going forward," Matus said. More lows for March Building permits for new housing fell 4% to a 2.023 million annual rate. This is the lowest level since last August. Single family permits fell 5.4% to 1.552 million. Both apartment and single family housing starts fell sharply in March. Starts of new single-family homes fell by 14.4% to a 1.539 million seasonally adjusted annual rate. This is the also sharpest decline since Jan. 1991. Apartment starts fell 31.6% to 258,000. This is the sharpest decline since March 2000. In March, starts in the Midwest fell 29.3% to 309,000. This is the lowest of starts since Feb. 2003. Starts in the South fell 18% to 837,000. Starts in the West fell 12.7% to 503,000. In the Northeast, starts fell 3.6% to 188,000. The government's housing data are subject to large sampling and other statistical errors. Seasonal adjustment is particularly tricky during winter months, when weather plays a crucial factor. The government cautions that it can take up to five months for a new trend to be established in starts.
Maybe because they can't manage things. Maybe because after 9/11 the economy took a huge hit and they were giving away car loans (the biggest part of their business, not cars themselves) at 1.5% and in some cases, FREE. If it's so bad, why are you on the internet? To hear you tell it, we all live in card board boxes and eat out of the trash bins at McDonalds