DA, we already booted the British from this country in the "Boston Tea Party" now all they have is you and your friends to tax, so you must deal with it. The war is not helping matters as they need more tax money to support it so there is little hope that taxes will be reduced, but it sure as hell is worth fighting for, over taxation is a burden on any people and hurts business.
Do what the Rolling Stones & Led Zeppelin did when they went on tax exile from the UK, I guess all you can do is hide or form corporations else where as many of the Rock Stars do, they incorporate publishing companies in favorable locals to administrate royalties. You would have to contact your corporate attorney friends to get professional help. The above groups could afford the best lawyers in London and that may be the answer.
Did you notice at that press comference when they asked GW about what how his energy plan would lower gas prices he didn't know.
Oil prices can't drop much unless everyone goes broke because of high oil prices and demand drops because no one has any money (the Republicans are working on this = worldwide economic depression). The problem is that the dollar is very weak and the Arabs want more weak dollars to make up for the drop in the value of the dollar because of the government's budget deficit, now at all time records because of the Iraq war, so it is a vicious cycle. Folks that are broke can not buy gas at .50 cents a gallon anyway. So if the idiots bankrupt their own customers they will not have anyone to sell their overpriced oil to. The logic of a thief is to steal as much as they can while they can and that is what the "Houston Oil Men" (Enron) do real well, but they bankrupt the economies of the world while they commit their thefts. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Great article on the UK Election from CNN http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/29/uk.election/
right, they had no decent plan on their own. They just wanted to trash Bush and all of his efforts. Ppl understood that it would have been a disaster having Kerrey take over as Commander in Chief.
John Kerry is a hell of a lot smarter than the entire Bush administration put together TOOT. PS: We have been in a disaster since the "Bush Senior Gang" Stole the election in 2000, hate to break the news to you man PSS: No one has to trash Bush and his efforts, he has done a complete job of trashing this nation, the press needs to get off of it's ass and expose this administrations failure and complete sell out of the American people and hold them responsible for the destruction of the world economy.
Maybe you missed the CNN article TOOT where the mother of one of the dead UK servicemen is now filing a lawsuit against the Government and Tony Blair for this illegal war PS: maybe it was right in the first Gulf war in 91 TOOT, but we had the wrong guy in office making decisions then too and he let Saddam live.
I've seen nothing *credible* that suggests the swifties lied. In fact, I've seen just the opposite. What I saw, was willing mainstream media that shilled for Kerry to cover up his treason. I saw a MSM that buried the story FOR HIM. I saw a MSM that, without investigation, simply wrote off the swifties. 300 of them, vs the 10 John Kerry had on his payroll to say otherwise. Be glad I wasn't here during that time. I have more info on John Kerry's treason to this country then you'll ever want to see. I'm sure his treason was one of the main reasons you voted for him. Actually, he did have a response. Why you would suggest he didn't (other than to intentionally lie) is open to debate. Like I've said before, there are many reasons to not like Bush. But you don't have to lie and make things up do to it. Unfortunately, and as usual, the reporter did not take into account the daily terrorists attacks against not only coalition troops, but the people of Iraq as well. What's the solution? Keep doing exactly what we are doing. Closing off their funding, capturing them, convincing other countries that appeasement (ie: Spain) is not the solution. When you take away the daily acts happening in Iraq, the picture of terrorism is quite different. You have to realize Anthony, that some people are glad we've not had anymore terrorist attacks in the US. Under Clinton, for the most part, they went ignored. And we clearly saw, that ignoring them won't make them stop. Not everyone is willing to make terrorists victims.
Why would they want to attack here at this time when our men are sitting ducks for them in Iraq GTech???? You know that but hide facts with freedom propaganda, this war is not about freedom but oil greed man, get real In addition the UK will pull out soon after their elections and Bush will have no help at all. More attacks are happening everyday, we are not winning the war, in fact Bush just asked for and got another 82 Billion and it will all be wasted as we will not be able to hold that ground and will withdraw soon and the country will be back in civil war and we will have done nothing but destroyed their land and leave. This is what is going to happen GTech and the EU (NATO) will step in after we leave
So you do get it? Imagine my surprise! We fight them in Iraq so we don't have to fight them here? Tell me you really get it, say it isn't so! And not only that, but we're taking them out a dime a dozen. No, our men are not sitting ducks. They are there to help the people of Iraq, who are also targets of these virgin seeking terrorists that are coming in from neighboring countries. I'm sure that's what you hope for, but it's speculation. Not every takes on your defeatest position. You want the US to fail, so you say things like that. You want terrorists to win, to take over and deny Iraqi's freedom, so you hope for the worst. But not everyone shares that opinion, Anthony. Imagine if everyone used a wiji board to make such predictions
The EU is going to sit back and watch us go broke and lose more men until the American people demand a withdraw as we did in Vietnam, they know that this will happen soon and Bush will have no choice because if does not withdraw he will be impeached.
Again, imagine if everyone used a wiji board to make such predictions. Just because you want us to fail in Iraq doesn't mean everyone wants us to.
It wasn't, isn't and can't be the right thing. If the question had been "should Saddam be removed" the answer would be yes. However, that was not the case. To try and cover it up infront of 50 million people is the whole reason labour hasnt run away with the election this time. If Brown had replaced Blair then there would be no competition.
It will not be the first time GTech, we failed in Vietnam, we failed in Lebanon, we failed in the first Gulf War by not taking out Saddam. Get used to it man.
We failed in Vietname because of people like Kerry and Fonda. One of the Generals in Vietnam noted in his book after the war that they were ready to call it quits, but it was people like Kerry and Fonda that gave them strength to carry forward. The North captured the South after we left Vietnam. Lebanon - no comment, not up to speed on it, but I sure don't take your word for it. Gulf War 1 - we didn't fail, in fact, we accomplished our mission. Our mission was NOT to take out Saddam, but to help Kuwait. It's really sad that you deliberately want to see your country fail. It's even worse that you pretend they did. I can't imagine where so much hatred for one's country comes from. Reminds me of John Kerry.