Yup! Excuses are for losers, you fail to address any points I make, instead choosing character assisination to replace any feeble attempt at reasoning. You want to know where I learned it from. From the same place you didn't. I even said you would fail to address my points, choosing to take they gutless way out and be evasive. I get better arguments from my 13 year old neice. But that's okay, you are the one that has the economy on a course for destruction, it really matters not what you think of me.
Duly noted, mikmik and Anthony are disappointed saddam is not still killing millions. Maybe you two should join his defense team.
These things are already happening mikmik, so we are past warning time, we are in a fall in the stock market, decline of the dollar, getting close to a real estate bust and a banking crisis.
I'm not disappointed he's not in power, I just wish it had been done in a better fashion. I think the UN should have gone in, not the US alone.
The UN was making a killing on the oil-for-food program. So were the corrupt allies we had. Many being bought off (additionally) with oil vouchers. No, there was no chance the UN would step in. Saddam made sure he bought them off. Boy Anthony, look at all that DNC hype on the previous page. I bet you just skip right over it
President Cheney and Bush Senior left him in power, right GTech Bush must have given their states war $$$$$ and that is why they backed the war GTech
I thought that was covered? Circular? Which way of killing his people did you enjoy most Anthony? Yea, Bush, Governor of Texas managed to give all states $$$$ back in 1998. And you'd probably rationale that to excuse ALL THOSE DEMOCRATS just waiting to go to war in 1998 and 2002.
No excuses, I wasn't going to read your whole post. But your words, which are the same from eveyone one else I run in to at an art college in Ashland oregon. Nothing new. So repeated "propoganda" By the way the only character assasination has been from you on this thread. Just go back and read your comments. I write 1 sentence and you compare me to a child. I do like to hear all sides of the story as long as it just isn't a minless repeat of what others say (or just copy and paste of articles, which the articles are fine if they aren't just opinion are biased bigotry.)
gtech, you are lying: where a million people killed? Your troops tortured people, but that is reported in the news. Where do you fabricate your stats from, besides thin air, I mean, at least you can pretend to back your taunts up. And don't forget to ignore all the radiation poisoning and birth defects in Iraq and Kosovo, we wouldn't want you to forget to address that one, would we? Oh, did you see all the reports about how precarious your economic situation is? That is the ultimate in stupidity, you actually think that by ignoring that stuff it will go away, as if you think I will forget all the massive amounts a back-up I provided for my opinion, you don't think I will let you forget that, do you? ow about telling me about how approx 1000,000 deaths in Iraq since 2002, that is not made up, and I don't care what you bring up, it is still 100,000 deaths in a war that was fabricated to begin with, you have absolutely no justification, just made up crap that a 6 year old can see through. But who cares, you are a dullard, and there is no way in the world you have the guts to ever take responsibilty for wrondoinds, you have a fragile little ego, poor baby, that must be protected at all costs, even if it means your eventual downfull. I think pride is one of the seven deadly sins, is it not? How about greed, that si one also, and I know bearing false witness is a big sin. But the worst sin is your blatant acceptance of needless death, ypou even claim it as necessary. But you must have a plan to take care of everything, maybe you are going to lend President Bush a couple of bucks to take care of the trade deficit and debt. That is how it works in your ego protecting scheme, isn't it, denial, and fantasy, but necer, under any circumstances, admit you are wrong, even if it means your destruction. Ypou should be proud of yourself, your unwavering commitment to never let facts and reason sway your judgement. Maybe you guys should go to my college math prof for reading lessons as well, then you wouldn't be overwhelmed by e few pages of material to read, an amount I can read in less than twenty minutes, all of it.
Or when Anthony recognizes all those Democrats chomping at the bit to go to war Oh those Hawkish Dems
At the rate the thread is going, think it can beat out the 'neat tool' thread? That would actually be a bit sad i think
Sorry mikmik, but according to estimates, saddam (apparently with your blessing) murdered over 1,000,000 of his own people. The death toll in Iraq from us being there is not 100,000. That is a fabricated number that nut jobs try to use in defense of saddam killing his own people. We are not fighting Iraqis, just cowards from other countries looking for some virgins. Which method of saddam's torture did you enjoy most?
Need I say more. This post tops all of you other posts by far! Congratulations!! Now I think I need to go do something productive like take care of my beautiful children. The few points you made I have never seen any true evedence for and you only seems to be attacking gtech and the last one was obviously for me. (I am totally serious about college professors who teach a subject not related but somehow take the class into politics and Bush hating. LAME)
I think Anthony is waiting for it to go to the next page, so he can ignore his hawkish democrat buddies. That was probably a shocker to him
Come on GTech President Cheney left him in power in 91 to gas the Kurds The only reason they backed Bush is to keep bases open in their states and you know that for a fact GTech
It's because everyone feels that because they have an opinion, it must be an EDUCATED one. We can see from evidence here that it is simply not the case. BTW....there is a difference between the ability to read and the ability to read AND comprehend, wouldn't you agree? Now go play with your children, you child