To buy or to Trade?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by tanicos, Apr 26, 2008.

  1. #1
    which is the best solution for links? To buy them with only 1 way links or to trade them? And why?
    Are blog links more powerful than normal sites?

    Example:
    I had a link exchange program and had about 500 links /month with any kind of website or PR...i had the link pages with nofollow and .htaccess restricted for robots
    I've got PR3 for all my site pages--about 15...even for the portfolio ones

    I've stopped that and bought some PR3-4 links
    After 1 month google sent me to page 4 instead of page 2 for web 2.0 design keyword, and even took all my pr leaving me a PR2 for the homepage..

    Strange right?
     
    tanicos, Apr 26, 2008 IP
  2. Nesooo

    Nesooo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #2
    It is best to bay links, they are worth more on search enginec insted link ex.
     
    Nesooo, Apr 26, 2008 IP
  3. tanicos

    tanicos Banned

    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    and what about rankings?
     
    tanicos, Apr 26, 2008 IP
  4. w3bmaster

    w3bmaster Notable Member

    Messages:
    17,594
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #4
    One way links

    I don't waste time with linkexchanges ...
     
    w3bmaster, Apr 26, 2008 IP
  5. gr8liverpoolfan

    gr8liverpoolfan Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,719
    Likes Received:
    538
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #5
    So the guys that you exchanged links with accepted the no follow ?
     
    gr8liverpoolfan, Apr 26, 2008 IP
  6. tanicos

    tanicos Banned

    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    it was a link exchange website where the links are checked automatically..you don't review them yourself...at 500 links:D
     
    tanicos, Apr 27, 2008 IP