Yeah, seems like an improper choice to me. Possibly politically motivated? We are in the middle of a war, and they really think this web 2.0 stuff is most important?
Perhaps yes.. I don't think that anyone from the politicians deserve it this year. Look around and you will see war everywhere so we the commoners were left as their only choice.
Yes, it's weird but I think the real success of the websites mentioned on the article is people like us. Two of the websites mentioned on the article are now owned by Google. So what's the next target by Google?
They don´t have anyone to put on...so they choose to put a strange and ´original´ candidate...all to continue to sell their magazine and to promote the idiot and foulish CANDIDATE OF THE YEAR....come on!