1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

This modern web site will NEVER work in IE9

Discussion in 'Bing' started by drhowarddrfine, Mar 4, 2011.

  1. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Actually, I use FreeBSD.
    SEMrush
     
    drhowarddrfine, Mar 6, 2011 IP
    SEMrush
  2. blackrainbowelte

    blackrainbowelte Peon

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Actually, you have no friends I guess...read back your posts...you are trolling EVERYONE commenting on this topic, proving that you are such superior...
     
    blackrainbowelte, Mar 6, 2011 IP
  3. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Now, I know most people here have barely heard of html or css, much less the things I'm now going to list, but here are some things on that web page that work in ALL modern browsers but do not work in IE9. In addition, some of these things Microsoft has already stated they won't support in IE9:

    # Application Cache (offline)
    # Web Workers (threads in JavaScript)
    # HTML5 Forms (validation mechanism, CSS3 selectors)
    # JavaScript Strict Mode
    # ForeignObject (embed external content in SVG)
    # SMIL Animations (SVG animations)
    # File API
    # WebGL (3D)
    # CSS3 Transitions (for animations)
    # CSS3 Text Shadow
    # CSS3 Gradients
    # CSS3 Border Image
    # CSS3 Flex box model
    # ClassList APIs
    # FormData
    # HTML5 History API
    # Drag'n Drop from Desktop
     
    drhowarddrfine, Mar 6, 2011 IP
  4. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Well, at least I'm glad you think I proved it.
     
    drhowarddrfine, Mar 6, 2011 IP
  5. blackrainbowelte

    blackrainbowelte Peon

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    No you haven't, the only good post was the post before this.
     
    blackrainbowelte, Mar 6, 2011 IP
  6. robbo1000

    robbo1000 Active Member

    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #26
    geeze !!dont even mention opera or safari
     
    robbo1000, Mar 6, 2011 IP
  7. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    Why not? I did. Superior browsers far more advanced today than IE9 will be whenever it comes out.
     
    drhowarddrfine, Mar 6, 2011 IP
  8. nanncy222

    nanncy222 Peon

    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    if you want to work seo from your pc you need to download and run Firefox because Firefox give you seo tools
     
    nanncy222, Mar 12, 2011 IP
  9. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    drhowarddrfine, Mar 15, 2011 IP
  10. rakesh.tcy

    rakesh.tcy Peon

    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    If its not working in IE9, then I am sure Mozilla will find the solution & update it.
     
    rakesh.tcy, Mar 16, 2011 IP
  11. diggathedog

    diggathedog Peon

    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    I think you need to read the thread. Or perhaps we should follow this train of thought, and just ask MS to tell us what web standards they'd like us to use ... hey, maybe they could define them as well!
     
    diggathedog, Apr 5, 2011 IP
    mmerlinn likes this.
  12. mgunner97

    mgunner97 Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    Are you just incomplete? How can you say this is a modern website?
    Have you ever validated this web page using this http://validator.w3.org ?
    I think you are just after Microsoft and IE. You really don't know much as you are incomplete in these field?

    I'll give you some advice. Please follow it.

    https://demos.mozilla.org/en-US/
    Validate this webpage using W3C validator here http://validator.w3.org
    Check if this is a valid webpage.

    I have checked this and the result is here:

    Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    Result: 17 Errors, 3 warning(s)

    Notes and Potential Issues

    The following notes and warnings highlight missing or conflicting information which caused the validator to perform some guesswork prior to validation, or other things affecting the output below. If the guess or fallback is incorrect, it could make validation results entirely incoherent. It is highly recommended to check these potential issues, and, if necessary, fix them and re-validate the document.

    Info Using experimental feature: HTML5 Conformance Checker.

    The validator checked your document with an experimental feature: HTML5 Conformance Checker. This feature has been made available for your convenience, but be aware that it may be unreliable, or not perfectly up to date with the latest development of some cutting-edge technologies. If you find any issues with this feature, please report them. Thank you.

    ↑ Top
    Validation Output: 17 Errors

    Error Line 4, Column 51: Attribute xmlns:eek:g not allowed here.

    xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml">

    ✉
    Warning Line 4, Column 51: Attribute with the local name xmlns:eek:g is not serializable as XML 1.0.

    xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml">

    ✉
    Error Line 4, Column 51: Attribute xmlns:fb not allowed here.

    xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml">

    ✉
    Warning Line 4, Column 51: Attribute with the local name xmlns:fb is not serializable as XML 1.0.

    xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml">

    ✉
    Error Line 17, Column 11: Bogus comment.

    <![if gte IE 9 ]>

    ✉
    Error Line 19, Column 14: Bogus comment.

    <![endif]>

    ✉
    Error Line 25, Column 82: Attribute property not allowed on element meta at this point.

    … <meta property="og:title" content="Mozilla&#39;s Web O&#39;(pen) Wonder"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 25, Column 82: Element meta is missing one or more of the following attributes: http-equiv, itemprop, name.

    … <meta property="og:title" content="Mozilla&#39;s Web O&#39;(pen) Wonder"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 26, Column 52: Attribute property not allowed on element meta at this point.

    <meta property="og:type" content="website"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 26, Column 52: Element meta is missing one or more of the following attributes: http-equiv, itemprop, name.

    <meta property="og:type" content="website"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 27, Column 70: Attribute property not allowed on element meta at this point.

    <meta property="og:url" content="https://demos.mozilla.org/"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 27, Column 70: Element meta is missing one or more of the following attributes: http-equiv, itemprop, name.

    <meta property="og:url" content="https://demos.mozilla.org/"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 28, Column 107: Attribute property not allowed on element meta at this point.

    …" content="https://demos.mozilla.org/media/img/facebook_like_500x312.png"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 28, Column 107: Element meta is missing one or more of the following attributes: http-equiv, itemprop, name.

    …" content="https://demos.mozilla.org/media/img/facebook_like_500x312.png"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 29, Column 86: Attribute property not allowed on element meta at this point.

    … <meta property="og:site_name" content="Mozilla&#39;s Web O&#39;(pen) Wonder"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 29, Column 86: Element meta is missing one or more of the following attributes: http-equiv, itemprop, name.

    … <meta property="og:site_name" content="Mozilla&#39;s Web O&#39;(pen) Wonder"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 31, Column 137: Attribute property not allowed on element meta at this point.

    …capable of? Explore the Web o' Wonder demo gallery and prepare to be amazed!"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 31, Column 137: Element meta is missing one or more of the following attributes: http-equiv, itemprop, name.

    …capable of? Explore the Web o' Wonder demo gallery and prepare to be amazed!"/>

    Attributes for element meta:
    Global attributes
    name
    http-equiv
    content
    charset

    Error Line 651, Column 104: & did not start a character reference. (& probably should have been escaped as &amp;.)

    …illa.com/en-US/mobile/download/?WT.mc_id=webwonder&WT.mc_ev=click">Mobile</div>
     
    mgunner97, Sep 4, 2011 IP
  13. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    And, again, the DP braintrust arises and brings up a five month old thread. Completely ignorant of modern standards and practices, they are oblivious.
    That validator is not as up to date as the newer, better HTML5 Validator which I'm sure you are totally unaware of. Even that one doesn't catch all the newer elements and properties available in modern browsers today (and of course not IE).
    Ah the standard Microsoftie response. "Microsoft hatred" is the reason the page doesn't work in IE and not the fact that the markup won't work in IE because IE can't run it. All that markup is completely documented by the W3C and WHATWG and works in ALL modern browsers but the fact that it doesn't run in IE is only due to "Microsoft/IE hate" and no other reason.
    See what I just typed and then tell us who is "incomplete".
     
    drhowarddrfine, Sep 4, 2011 IP
  14. mgunner97

    mgunner97 Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #34
    This reply shows how much incomplete you are.

    You are saying "All that markup is completely documented by the W3C"
    Here you are 50% incomplete. You should know this is W3C Validator http://validator.w3.org.

    And as per your validator result :

    Error: Attribute xmlns:eek:g not allowed here.

    From line 1, column 16; to line 4, column 51

    TYPE html>↩<html LANG="en-US" dir="ltr" ↩ xmlns:eek:g="http://ogp.me/ns#"↩ xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml">↩ <he

    Warning: Attribute with the local name xmlns:eek:g is not serializable as XML 1.0.

    From line 1, column 16; to line 4, column 51

    .........................................
    .........................................
    ...............................................

    There were errors. (Tried in the text/html mode.)

    Total execution time 862 milliseconds.

    Note: Before posting an incomplete data think 100 times.
    Check 2 times before posting what are you posting.

    You haven't checked the validation of the web page and posting with unrelevant arrguements.

    I was thinking you are 30% incomplete. But your reply to my post shows you are 100% incomplete.
     
    mgunner97, Sep 4, 2011 IP
  15. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    Here you show you are ignorant. You are trying to compare the documentation to the validator. The validator is far behind the documentation of the new elements. You want the validator to validate new implementations but you don't understand that that won't happen. If you can't figure that out, then it's no point arguing with you.

    As I said, EVERYTHING will work in ANY modern browser but it WON'T work in inept, incompetent, backwards IE. Documented, proven, verifiable.
     
    drhowarddrfine, Sep 4, 2011 IP
  16. rockeerz

    rockeerz Active Member

    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #36
    Check it in the linux . Hope you will able to open.May be IE doesn't support that HTML
     
    rockeerz, Sep 4, 2011 IP
  17. Corcorlee

    Corcorlee Peon

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #37
    It does to work fine, I have no proplem with it.
     
    Corcorlee, Sep 13, 2011 IP
  18. drhowarddrfine

    drhowarddrfine Peon

    Messages:
    5,428
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    Cause you didn't use a modern browser and only IE so you missed out on most of the functionality available to those of us who use modern browsers (never IE). But IE users are used to missing out and not knowing the difference.
     
    drhowarddrfine, Sep 13, 2011 IP