The URL accuracy - is it really that important?

Discussion in 'Support & Feedback' started by qwikad.com, Aug 28, 2013.

  1. #1
    Sorry if this has been asked before. What is the purpose for stopping a URL from being posted if it misses a www or if it's a redirect? Almost all URLs work fine in all browsers without a www or forward slash at the end. Sometimes, I want to post a quick reply and I need to mention this or that URL, but because of the auto URL correct it becomes like a pain in the butt.
     
    qwikad.com, Aug 28, 2013 IP
  2. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #2
    Mostly to stop malicious activity like people posting affiliate links or cookie stuffing by posting redirecting images...
     
    digitalpoint, Aug 28, 2013 IP
  3. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,280
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Best Answers:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #3
    So a URL then is not necessarily going through a DP redirect function? Like Twitter or G+, don't they eliminate a possibility of cookie stuffing by redirecting links through their own redirects (plus.url.com/blah-blah-blah or t.com/blah-blah-blah) or does it serve a completely different purpose?

    I hear what you're saying, but if you ask a few DP members, they will probably concur that that auto URL correct pop up is painful to deal with at times.
     
    qwikad.com, Aug 28, 2013 IP
  4. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,810
    Likes Received:
    4,535
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #4
    Redirects were a huge problem on the old forum. I've had issues posting so I know how users are affected but it really does help keep the forum clean.
     
    sarahk, Aug 28, 2013 IP
  5. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #5
    Yeah, there are certainly a few domains that could be trusted, but we didn't build a white-list system for it. Honestly, it's just easier all around to have people post the *actual* URLs. 95% for spam prevention reasons... as @sarahk mentioned, it was such a huge problem before that we had to build the system. Not like we built it to try and figure out a way to annoy people. :)
     
    digitalpoint, Aug 28, 2013 IP
  6. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,280
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Best Answers:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #6
    But isn't it kind of a cut-and-dry approach? Why not allow all links that have a http://digitalpoint.com (.org .net .co, etc.) structure to be posted, no matter what, and then stop everything else. If you want to stop redirects or affiliate links - fine, but when a normal link is stopped because it misses the www or the slash forward at the end, it becomes kind of annoying.

    We've "trained" our markdown to do things that other markdowns can't do. All it takes is just a bit more time and commitment.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2013
    qwikad.com, Aug 29, 2013 IP
  7. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #7
    Yeah... just automatically replacing the posted URL with the final destination is something I plan on looking into when I have the time. That would (hopefully) solve the inconvenience factor it currently brings.
     
    digitalpoint, Aug 29, 2013 IP
    qwikad.com likes this.