Looking at The Sematic Grid System (http://semantic.gs/), it uses quite different logic to maintain grids. Instead of including lots of .span* stuff to the HTML, grid is specified directly in the CSS file. That looks interesting and makes responsive design being built in a second. However, I am thinking if it is worth of it. The problem is, that it uses lots of repeated style. What is your opinion? Thanks in advance!
Thanks, interesting link. I need some tests with compiling LESS to CSS, but it could useful for small projects at the first blush.
Given that it relies on that idiotic crutch known as "LESS", is a CSS framework, and basically turns the redundant/pointless HTML 5 bloat into using tags in a presentational manner, much less is the idiocy of using grids for layout in the first place with the inherent accessibility flaws -- much like every other grid system I'm stuck wondering how/why anyone is DUMB ENOUGH to want to use things like this in the first place. Particularly since even their simple "responsive" demo (that falls apart miserably here) is blowing 34k of scripting and 10k of CSS/LESS on doing 3 to 4k of flat CSS without all that garbage's job. Of course anything built using anything of Meyers bloated idiotic resets and HTML 5 automatically gets flagged as useless trash by me. CSS, semi-fluid design and responsive layout isn't rocket science -- STOP trying to make something simple harder. More you overtake the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain.