The Sarah Palin Thread

http://www.gene.ch/gentech/1998/Jul-Sep/msg00188.html

and where do you think exotic species of rabbits and pigeons came from?

you might also want to read this about e-coli bacteria evolving new features under observation by scientists for a period of 20 years

 

Wow. Great points homebizseo.

 

BS. Creationism is not science - it has nothing to do with education. It's a religious myth that has no place in school. It's so extremely sad to me that our nation is at such a low place intellectually that this even has to be discussed. It's ridiculous.

 

You can always move.

 

Copying and posting someone else's stance is far from 'proving' anything.



BTW your bold you keep doing might work if I was a 'non christian'

 

It is sad isn't it. it's 2008 and we still have people believing ancient myths over science.

What makes it even more sad is the primitive nomads who originally came up with this crap knew no better. They wouldn't have wrote it or believed it if they had access to the knowledge base we have today, For them it was the first stab at an explanation and the best they could do. The creationists today have no excuse.

 

So evolution, with no facts proving its true for some odd reason to you. If you bread one kind of animal with another, you will get a strange new creature, this is called "breading" i'm sure you know what it is but that's what happens. The animals that are "different" than all the others, are just breaded that way, and don't usually live as long as other kinds of animals, which is true in the eyes of even non-christian scientists.

 

Same old Grim. No disproving anything because he can't.

 

What are you talking about? Is this incoherent nonsense in any way supposed to refute 150 years of solid science?

I don't mean to be patronising (it means talking down to people), But try reading this aloud before hitting the reply button. I literally have no idea what you are trying to say or how any of it is supposed to refute evolution..

Still waiting for the evidence supporting creation homebizseo. Got any yet? Why don't you have a google, See if you can borrow the thoughts of someone else to save you using your own brain. By the way, Don't use the bacterial flagellum or the clotting cascade, Not unless you want to be humiliated in public.

 

I gave you an answer above. Have you read it?

 

What is there to disprove?

Your copy and pasted nonsensical post bolding something about 'non christians' when I am in fact a Christian?

I prove you wrong on here all the time Homebiz, dont' make me laugh.

Most scientists believe in something other than creationism, why anyone would need to 'prove' that is about the same as needing to prove water is wet. It's a well known fact.

 

Then prove it. Don't talk about it.

 

No, that's called hybridisation. You can't just cross animal X with animal Y and get animal Z - it doesn't work like that. The animals must be genetically (and physiologically) similar.

There is ample evidence to support evolution.

 

It's funny how some people boldly argue against the evidence implying that evolution didn't and doesn't occur, but they never state clearly their alternative explanations, and I don't mean a vague "well, it's god's creation", but a clear explanation on how and when things happened. I guess because they know it's absurd.

 

Example, cross a Wiener dog with a Rottweiler, what do you think will happen?

 

A wienerweiler?

Is your point that not every time an animal breeds a new species is created?

 

Hey, first, learn how to quote when responding

second, you're not going to disprove evolution using this argument about crosses. the whole thing is much more complex I'm afraid.

 

You'll get offspring carrying traits of each of the parents. And?

 

Why have the animals stopped the evolution possess since man arrived?



It never happened.

 

They haven't.