The Real Rudy? Rudy Giuliani SEX WITH HIS COUSIN & CROSS DRESSING...LOL??

It does seem pretty hopeless sometimes.

Sure, just like high school:

* The Neo-con ('jocks') want to beat up the Iranian ('freaks')...
* But many of the 'spectators' don't care (or understand) we are talking about mass-murder on a huge scale.
~~~

Rudy G. is ready to use his corrupt tactics to bring even more fascism to America.

 

I don't believe any of the candidates are "corrupt." No doubt there are some wide differences between them. Some are kooky, some have more skeletons in their closet than others (that we know of), some come across whiney, some come across as leaders, some come across as pacifists and some you just can't help but shake your head and wonder how they got to the point they are.

I do find it ironic, given the overwhelming support that one particular candidate has, that one of his supporters would use the word "fascism" towards an opposing candidate. Definitely worth a chuckle or two

 

• A chuckle or two??
• Laugh at this you happy Neo-con...

(((Note: I double-checked the factual evidence that the city did make the two payments I highlight.

* All the rest?...Feel free to wish it away with your Neo-con happy pills )))

``

Years later, as mayor, Giuliani would let another group of blue-uniformed thugs torture and terrorize Haitians and Black people, as he unleashed the NYPD to enforce “Giuliani Time.”

In 1997, after Justin Volpe had raped Abner Louima, who required surgery to repair a ripped colon and a set of new teeth (knocked out with a feces covered nightstick). Giuliani sided with lying cops who tried to cover up the horrific abuse. I guess Giuliani felt that the city should not have paid Louima $8.75 million in compensation for the night of hell – but then again, Giuliani did not have to pay the bill!

In February 1999, after four of Giuliani’s thugs gunned down an unarmed, African immigrant, Amadou Diallo, from point blank range – only hitting Diallo with 19 of 41 shots from a distance of five feet, Giuliani defended their poor marksmanship; efforts to have the trial removed from NYC and then the acquittal of thugs who assassinated an innocent. The city settled for $3 million.

When New York’s murder machine killed Patrick Dorismond, we really learned what Giuliani’s pinch felt like … and we could imagine what Il Duce might bring to the nation as president.

In March 2000, Plan Giuliani encouraged two cops to descend like vultures on a couple of marks. An undercover cop approached Haitian immigrant, Patrick Dorismond, and a friend and propositioned them to buy some marijuana. (I think Giuliani would call this detective work). Dorismond and his friend responded in a way that would make Nancy Reagan proud – he said “No.” But moreover, Dorismond tried to get the “drug dealing scum” away from him and began to attack the drug pusher! What was Dorismond’s reward for being the object of a sting? He was assassinated – shot pointblank in the chest, because he REFUSED to buy drugs from a cop! As an epilogue, the city paid the family of Dorismond a $2.25 million settlement.

Those are the hallmarks of Giuliani time. Cops who gun-down innocents, try to peddle drugs, and rape men in handcuffs.

~~~



Laugh at that you happy Neo-con

 

Thanks, I'm laughing my ass off! Let's see:

1) Goofy/loony source? A dime a dozen.

2) Photoshopped Image? Dollar will get you a dozen!

3) Someone invokes fascism whose candidate has huge support from fascist neo-nazi groups? - Priceless!

There's some things money can still buy. Massa Card - It's cotton pickin' good!

 

Reality check

1. The city paid over $8,700,000 (this I verified elsewhere)
2. The man got brutally raped by a police nightstick (Edit: "broken plunger")
3. The sadistic fascists ripped his colon out
4. The cops tried to cover it up, and Rudy Giuliani sided with the sicko cops.
5. Remember, the city paid over $8,700,000

~~~
~~~
Edit:
Mainstream source

17 July
2001 Abner Louima won $8.75 million to compensate him for being tortured by New York City policemen, who shoved a broken plunger up his rectum.
~~~

Note for GTech:

It is true I haven't bothered to find a high-quality source for Rudy G.'s part in the sadistic cover-up.
For now, please, 'tell the world' why you were still laughing at such a sick, true story of brutality.

~~~
~~~

Reality check question

* You didn't bother to really read, and just kept laughing (after 'peeking' at the source),

or...

* You read the words, and actually think it's funny?

Which is it 'tough guy'?
Are you still laughing because Rudy's goons cost the city over $8,700,000 for a brutal, sadistic rape of a handcuffed male?
Why, exactly are you still laughing??

 

gemini, you're trying too hard to suggest rudy put a nightstick up someone's butt.

Why am I laughing? I've noted it twice now, but since it seems to elude you...

"Someone invokes fascism whose candidate has huge support from fascist neo-nazi groups? - Priceless!"

Massa Card?

 

I have to give you credit for this excellent post. Your best post ever.

 

I provided evidence of corrupt, brutal, fascist cops & multi-millions in NY City payments.

* The payments are an actual fact.
* You are 100% unable to understand (or seen to be)

Ron Paul has huge support from a very wide variety of people who seek real freedom.

Truly priceless.


~~~~~~~~~

Edit:

NY Times Quotes Fascist Rudy G
* You decide if Fascist Rudy G speaks about the type of freedom you would want to live under:

"What we don't see is that freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want, be anything they can be. Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do." -Fascist Mayor Rudy G.

 

Sorry but the Iraq figure is 600 billion not 3 trillion.

 

I'm not surprised...

 

Cross dressing and sex with cousin is not illegal. make it illegal before you judge him.

 

The fact that he had sex with his cousin is the least scary thing about Rudy Giuliani.

 

Judging people on legality seems pretty crazy to me. There are things that are illegal that I have no problem with people doing (smoking marijuana or going 5 miles over the speed limit for two examples) and there are things are perfectly legal such as Fox News leaving Ron Paul out of the next debate in an attempt to censor his views that I find very distasteful.

There are many things that are legal now that were previously illegal (such as drinking a beer.) Think about things a bit. Really people just need to use their old noggin a bit more. People are just so quick to accept that "things are the way they are." They aren't. Things are always changing. And the way they are now is not some pinnacle that we have reached. There is much wrong with this country. Much that needs to be fixed.

 

There is much to be fixed, ok. But as long as the laws are there you have to accept them. The laws are there because there is democracy. You can also use the democracy to change the laws. But until you and the democracy changes the laws, the laws are correct.
Why on earth has it always been legal to have sex with a cousin? Yes, because the majority of the people think its ok.

 

We do not live in a Democracy. We live in a Constitutional Republic.

 

No. Absolutely not. There used to be a law against drinking beer, people didn't care for that law because a lot of people like drinking beer and don't think it's the Government's business. If they had just accepted this then the law never would have been changed. Of course there's the example that it used to be against the law for a woman or a black man to vote. They could have just accepted those laws but they thought they were unjust and they worked to change them. It is not our duty as citizens of a democratic country to accept unjust laws, it is our duty to fight against them, to do everything we can to change them.

 

guerilla, USA is a democracy. I hope you know what democracy is.

Please dont misunderstand me. I too think that it is our duty to try to change laws if we dont like the law. But as long as the laws are there, that law is the result of democracy and we have to obey the laws as long as they are there. The elected people are elected by us and therefor we decide the laws through them.
Even the beer law was decided by people that was elected by us, therefor we decided that there should be a beer law.
Do you understand what I am saying now?

 

The USA is a Constitutional Republic. It is not a democracy.

That is true to an extent. The government only exists because it is constitutionally mandated, and the constitution uses democracy to determine direct representation.

The government is restrained in what it can legislate and what areas each portion of government is responsible for, again, mandated by the Constitution.

I understand what you are trying to say, you just are confusing democracy with a Constitutional Republic. We have unalienable rights, as laid out in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (Amendments). The government cannot legally remove the right to free speech, to assemble or to practice a religion.

No matter how much "democracy" such changes would have to be made by Constitutional Amendment, which is a massive and arduous undertaking.

 

guerilla, I think we agree.