The Real Cause of 911?

If you spent as much effort on a project as you do on posting in this P&R forum you'd be a focking millionaire mate with more money than Donald Rumsfeld.

I'd even pay you to go out promoting my new project but you don't like me very much so I doubt you will lol.

Oh PS, My conspiracy site is up for sale (me and my partner bonzer are cleaning house to concentrate on our new project) and you could maybe buy it and fill it with Bush, Cheney, Pentagon and Fox News propaganda.

 

You can say that again!

 

Duh, that's exactly what I was saying! If I had the forethought to create *conspiracies for profit* to sucker money from young angry white males with low IQs, I'd be rich. And I slap myself for not having the foresight to realize how gullible people are and how willing they are to hand over their money! Hell, you alone could have made a few house payments for me!

Liking someone isn't necessarily a criteria for me. Honesty and integrity are. Honestly, I think you're a nice guy that got caught up in a *movement* that made you feel like you belonged to something. I often wonder what your posts would be like if you hadn't been suckered into that crowd.

I had considered making a low bid, but between the web design, programming and my own sites, coupled with wasting entirely too much time here, I'd never get around to it. Thank you for the offer though.

 

Why not snap it up on the cheap (current bid is only $150 at the mo ) and sell it to Bill O'Reilly buddy?

He makes loads of money off of gullible impressionable sheeple by selling his "Culture Warrior" book that he plugs almost every single minute on "The Oh No Reilly Factor."

 

whats funny is that people like you actually think you can "sell" a "theory"...I still love the fact they are called "theories" which proves they are not "fact", yet you rely on them so much...

 

I doubt O'Reilly would be interested in it. After all, he doesn't run *for profit* conspiracy sites and last I checked, he wasn't in the business of supporting terrorists by giving their credit to others.

I'm glad you are finally deciding to grow up and get rid of it though. Kudos to you!

 

Thanks buddy.

I'll be setting a new one up soon though, I'll PM you the URL when it's up and running lol.

And O'Reilly doesn't run *for profit* conspiracy sites, but he sells Government propaganda books.

 

Cool, can't wait to see it! Will you be using any honesty and integrity on this one?

 

Any new smoking guns?

 

oh wow that made me laugh, ya gonna get some rep for that Gtech

 

Edit: Someone's post seems to have disappeared, but I will answer it anyway. The poster linked to this digg page:
http://digg.com/politics/US_Government_has_funded_Al_Qaeda_for_months

The link you get from the digg page is to a terrible article, in where they have taken quotes out of context which make it confusing to understand what Hersh actually is saying.

But the article, is about increase of covert operations and clumsy use of money, not targeted Al Qaeda sponsoring. Some people with Al-Qaeda connections seems to have taken advantage of this.

But as I've said, the article is poorly written, you don't get much into details from it. I would like you to give me a better source for this.

Also, if it would really be about US sponsoring Al-Qaeda, it would be a whole frontpage about this(or at least an article including some evidence and a relevant title), I guess.

 

Isn't the US sponsoring terrorists in Iran?

 

I didn't see mention of hezbollah in there. Iran was sponsoring hezbollah, who is a terrorist group.

Did we read the same article?

Who is "understooding" or rather "understanding" such?

 

Funding for their separatist causes comes directly from the CIA's classified budget but is now "no great secret", according to one former high-ranking CIA official in Washington who spoke anonymously to The Sunday Telegraph.

His claims were backed by Fred Burton, a former US state department counter-terrorism agent, who said: "The latest attacks inside Iran fall in line with US efforts to supply and train Iran's ethnic minorities to destabilise the Iranian regime."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/25/wiran25.xml

 

Ah, so it's just speculation at this point. That's what I was reading also.

 

Well, I guess we have to wait and see if any more information turns up regarding this.

But we are talking about 9/11, not about what happens in Iran today. That's simply not an evidence for the truther hypothesis.

 

Whatever the reason of tower crashing is. But the reason behind the planes crash is US' intrusion in the rest of countries affairs. They should have mind their own business.

Why there was not so much terrorism when Russia was super power? Its a sentence which every US citizen should think of.

When you make atom bomb, its OK. When you fire it on Japan, Its alright.. They deserved it.

But when someone else make atom bomb, NO, Its not OK.

And this is the main reason of 9/11 -- I doubt all this will stop unless US' citizens force their govt. to change their policies and behavior regarding other countries.

 

what are you talking about??? Are you saying the reason 9/11 happened was because the US wouldn't let another country get a Nuke? I don't remember nuke talk being the case 6 years ago...I think you name may say it all....

 

Do you think that attacking US prevented their military activity? It's actually reverse, when they came under attack they responded in the same means, now is Afghanistan occupied, thanks to the terrorists.

I think it would be better to use diplomatic efforts instead of using brute force, such as Al Qaida do.

 

Aren't US forcing Iran and South Korea to shut their nuke activities?


And I was generally telling my view about the reason of 9/11.