Actually, the greek I have been studying is classical/biblical....however, I went back and did some digging, aero was actually used in the classical form, but often represented "sky" instead of "air"...my word is more associated with "air/heaven". AGS, face it, your video shows nothing, except that those of us that watched it would like to have our two hours back...we are dumber for having watched it.
OK thanks for that - You learn something new every day By the way, I've just watched Loose Change 2nd Edition. I don't see how those of you who haven't watched it can even criticise when you haven't used wisdom, and evaluated the side you're firmly arguing against. I suggest you watch it, it's not like an hour or so is going to kill you.
It doesn't deserve watching. The first version was so replete with factual inaccuracies, lies and fantasy, and so debunked so often, that it couldn't stand up in a cartoon. And now you want people to take a look at a second version? The truth is, 19 hijackers took part in a plot to kill Americans. That's been established and if any of these kooky conspiracies had a grain of professionalism to them, they would have long ago started a fund to defend those convicted and currently serving time in jail for their parts in this horrible crime. alex jones, dylan avery, john conners and the likes of these swindlers are taking young angry white males with low IQs and low self-esteems all the way to the bank and making fortunes marketing to people that are too dumb to know the difference. If their trash held any water, they'd have started a legal defense fund for, and rushed over to the defense team of Zacarias Moussaoui with all their "conspiracy" evidence to convince the jury otherwise. Anyone subscribing to and promoting these kooky conspiracy theories is guilty of giving aid and comfort to terrorists. And that's exactly what AGS does.
I look at the evidence. The major thing that changed my mind on 911 is William Rodriguez’s testimony. Testimony left out of the 911 reports. Testimony that truly damages the official story! Before this, I thought the terrorist did it. This man I believe and he tells it from the heart. If I were on a grand jury his testimony would have persuaded me to indict the criminals involved. If there was any video in the world that I would beg you to watch it is this one. Now I know it wont change a lot of minds. I never wanted the blue pill. But this is a real American that I believe. His story is so profound it cannot be avoided. Just skip Alex Jones introducing him. I don’t think Bush new about 911…
Sorry to hear that, Doug. I guess the IRS really took it's toll on you. They've messed up a lot of people. A friend of mine spent a year in jail over something similar to what you went through.
Dang, a whole year....that sucks! Don't worry about me...lol I still have a wife to torture me...ha Listen to this video, its only 17 seconds.
I respect you Gtech, unfortunetly I don't hear any explanations against the evidence put forward in the video. I don't see how: - Not finding the black box to flight 93, - Pentagon "plain crash" lacking debris, making a round explosive hole and hitting directly after clipping 5 lamp posts, - Multiple mobile phone calls on flight 93 despite scientific experiments showing a ~0.08 chance for each call connecting + the airlines support this ...can be explained by ad hominem. There's more, but these baffle me most. Also, your generalisation of the "truthers" being white and having a low IQ is slightly hypocritical and ironic, as you and so many others like to point out we need to look at the facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93#.22Black_Box.22_recorders What debris was it lacking? Most calls were made from air phones (seat back phones that would work in flight). Cellphone calls was possible at those altitudes these times. By the way, are you suggesting that those that got calls are liars? Really? I didn't know that truthers cared about the facts? Why would they else repeat the same debunked ridiculous theories over and over again without any skepticism?
Well, I listened to that entire thing and I still do not know exactly this guy was trying to say. I do like this line though: "go on de internet, do yours owns research". Unfortunately, that is where a great many have based their delusions.
The cockpit voice recorder was recovered from flight 93. The hole shown in loose change was not the entry hole, but the exit hole caused by the landing gear. Many of the phone calls were made from onboard air phones, as for cell phone, the reason they connected well and for long periods is because the plane was at only 8,000 feet. We also do not know how many attempts were made before a phone call from a cell went through, they may have tried hitting redial hundreds of times before connecting, but once one connected chance are others would as well.
I would imagine explosions are quite natural when you consider all the flammable and explosive items in a bunch of buildings that are on fire, and or in a state of collapse. Quite a few cars in the lower parking garages... Remember fires burning for days? Lots of fuel for those fires and explosions. Yawn...
Latehorn, I'm not saying those people who made the phone calls were liars. But the documentary shows that forgery is possible. Also, those pictures of the derbis show that there wasn't much debris there at all... where are the bodies? Bodies are there at most other plan crashes. Also where are the remains of the wings? And why are there no scratches or marks on the floor as a plane would make as it hit the pentagon? Afterall, it was low enough to hit street lamps, even if it was exiting. If the hole in loose change is the exit hole, why is there such a neat hole? Why did eye witnesses report silver flashes and the smell of explosives? Also, they report multiple explosions. Above all, why are isn't there debris within the building? If part of a plane fell through the concrete-steel reinforced walls, there surely would be fragments of the object.
you have a problem replying to the rest of the post? oh yea i forgot, you cant think of anything within reason to say, without making yourself look stupid, i mean you have David Ilke on your site, as someone that's to be trusted and giving people his imput and that guy claims to be the son of God
The explosions should actually be evidence against a demolition, right? Since no building was coming down seconds afterwards. If anything, those explosions support reality, not a conspiracy. Never seen that video before though. I like Doug, but his new belief that 911 was a conspiracy (if that's what it was) simply reaffirms my thinking that truthers simply have an axe to grind - legitimately or illegitimately - against the man.
Why the government fears William Rodriguez? 1) He is an eyewitness at ground zero in the war on 911. 2) He was declared a hero by every news agency in the world because of the lives he saved and for no other reason. That was before the media (because he was telling a true story of his experience) was told to turn away from him and to bury his evidence (testimony). The government offered him millions to keep quiet. Why is he credible? 1) Because he was there! 2) Because he was the head maintenance man for 20 years in the towers (a very trusted position). 3) Port authority and the legal system so much trusted him that, he is only one of five people in the world to have a master key that opens any door in both towers (that’s right – only 5 keys and he had one of them). 4) Over 50 policeman, firefighters and emergency personal support his story (they swore an oath during testimony to his and their experience. 5) Many citizens who he saved support his story including victims. Now, here is what shows we have scum trying to hide things: 1) Why was his testimony behind closed doors when others were out in the open that support government story? 2) Why were he and the other highly decorated officers and firefighters testimony (as to the credibility of his story) suppressed and not allowed in the 911 reports? 3) WTF are they trying to hide by keeping his testimony out and other decorated officers? 4) Why was the man who came to him with peeled burnt skin from the first explosion in the basement not allowed to testify? If I am burnt from fire in the basement and I was there at ground zero, why would my government keep me from testifying? William Rodriguez is a hero and I believe him and the other 50 officers and firefighters over my governments official story. The big problem for the government was that these men were so happy to be alive and could not be bribed in keeping their mouth shut (some were offered millions). Money is not important to a man who just I witnessed 200 of his friends dying. Only truth can help the nightmares go away. Another thing: William never blamed Bush. All he told was his story and for that his country turned against him and the other officers and firefighters. CIA and Feds have billions of dollars to ensure any story they want to be the official one, gets out regardless of the facts. Just cross them once and you will find out my friend. Good, educated men and women with college degrees and solid American family’s tell a different story than the government contrived version. Now its up to each one of us (as the freethinking Jury) to decide for ourselves whom to believe? I for one am with the American Hero’s.
Of course, UFOs hitting the tower is also possible. Thing is, if you don't have any evidence to back up your unofficial-conspiracy-theory claims, they're just worthless. Well, that's simply because the plane collided with a strong standing porous building. Did a quick google search for [bodies pentagon] and found this: http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/P200047-1.jpg http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200048-1.jpg Now, why didn't you made that google search before making your statement. Making a google search and finding this doesn't take more than a quarter of a minute, yet you have time to watch a 2 hour long conspiracy movie. Don't tell me that you're interested in the truth, because you're obviously not. I think they were splattered into smaller pieces, think about it. Loose Change said it bounced the lawn, I doubt that the official report says so. Show me the official report and I will take a look at it. What witnesses? Who said there was no debris within the building? But I'm no expert on Pentagon, ask lorien1973 for more information. It could also been the sound from a floor falling down on another. Wasn't the reporter in Loose Change saying "huge explosions" when WTC1 or 2 fell down?
i would like you to take a look at a 4 minute movie on thermite, this movie has nothing to do with 911, but it is 2 guys playing with thermite and showing you what it does to an engiene of a car in less than a minute. what is intresting is what thermite is, it is made from iron oxide and aluminium. iron oxide is rust WCT1 and WTC2 and WTC7 are made from steal, and steal is made from iron, a 767 is made from aluminium. put the 2 together and you are ½ way to making thermite. a description of what thermite is and a demonstration of its ability to melt straight through steel without creating an explosion or explosive noise when detonated. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGW-Qfd6p7w&mode=related&search= this would also explain why the molton metal was left in the basement and why it was still so hot 5 days later.
Other things people forget are that light is just a slight bit faster than sound. Well, actually, a HELL OF A LOT faster. We see boom, but don't hear boom for some time. That can confuse even the brightest of minds (no pun). Yeah, I'm a Doug liker too! I was under the impression Doug was kidding. After watching chico the janitor for 50 minutes, I am still convinced as I was before that there are a lot of lunatics out there. I found nothing in that video to be evidence of a conspiracy. Besides, I'm gonna listen to a janitor who is inside the building at the time and like my Aunt and Uncle (both worked in WTC7) know not what is going on at the time and are completely confused. I applaud his bravery and am glad he is alive to share with us today. I'm just not sure that is Mr. Jones best choice for a spokesperson. If it is, I'm gonna put on a red cape and go flying to my ice world in Antarctica.
That's because, as you discovered, they were not true in the first place. It's easy to fool someone by asking questions constructed in a manner to presume they are correct in the first place. That's how these guys sucker the gullible. Especially people like AGS. As was pointed out, they were not true and true explanations were provided. The challenge, of course, is are you going to continue promoting people that make you look foolish, or will you start demanding answers from them the same way you demand of others on their behalf? You're just looking for one lie from the government to absolve terrorists. You just discovered three lies from people that made you look foolish. What does that say? Things that make ya go hmmmm.....