The Pagerank (PR) Thread

Discussion in 'Google' started by dvduval, Jan 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mong

    Mong ↓↘→ horsePower

    Messages:
    4,789
    Likes Received:
    734
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #3141
    What's that 'protection'?

    Suppose if some crazy guy put live same link and and ppl start to send millions of queries per day about your site .... what would happen to your site? :confused:

    I wanna know about it... :p
     
    Mong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  2. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3142
    Nothing... BUT... along the same lines, I try and stay in on Friday the Thirteenth's and not walk under ladders. :p

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  3. lpstong

    lpstong Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    216
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3143
    Michael you have real anger issues. You have not proved either of any updates or not. You have bullied the others who have noticed fluctuations in their PR. You need to get anger management because the three links provide have proved nothing on your part of whether or not a pr is happening or not.

    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=2831963



    Your name is not Shoemoney or Matt Cutts. Or are you a Google engineer. You are upset for some reason and want to lash out. blog post about not having any friends and your discussion at another forum about PR updates. It appears you like to argue and have not proven anything with anyone, anywhere. Screenshots can be manipulated. I know when things move or not move on my site. Many others notice changes on their sites. But you apparently know when there is an update. So please enlighten the DP crowds who do see a fluctuation. You have provided no proof on your part that there is no updates on anyones sites, other than your anger and your chance to shine on what appears to be a lash out with your anger. A feeble attempt to convince the masses you know all. Guru of all updates, anything dealing with Search Engine Indexing and or PR.

    Prove to me that Google is not indexing whether it be inner or homepages of peoples sites. The weight of proof really is on you. Not me. Google does many things prior to an update or in the middle of the update. They check the backlinks thank do a PR update. There is no proof on your part that my sites or any others have not had any inner or homepage updates.

    Here is a calender of when Google has done Backlink checks than PR. People will notice a few days, if not more of a waiting period of an backlink check and an PR update by viewing the calender at Seologs. Things will vary and fluctuate for sometime. The longest period of waiting for a PR update is 6 months or so. But with the new Google gods of their snitch a paid link program.... I am sure many will be downgraded somehow, someway, and or banned or deindexed, or there pr devalued.

    I just smell a rotten egg in the crowd.... and it is coming from your direction. Apparently you had a sour grape before you even got a hold of my threads and or comments......

    Time will only tell and more people will only catch on to your frantic antics of "proof", "proof", "proof"...yet there is no "proof" and or expertise from your point of view.

    Really go take a run around a track a few times. Let off the steam. Push the chair away from the computer and breath a few moments.
     
    lpstong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
    frosty likes this.
  4. Web Gazelle

    Web Gazelle Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,590
    Likes Received:
    259
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #3144
    You guys should all go here and speculate about the PR update. ;)
     
    Web Gazelle, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  5. casperl

    casperl Peon

    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    57
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3145
    Same crazy guy may report your pagerank tool to Google and some crazy lawyer at Google may open a case to close your site since you reverse-engineer their pagerank protocol, used their internal services illegally and give a service to people for free (may be he may also try to show that you are earning from it by selling links), but i dont wanna know about it.. :p It is your own risk. People can evaluate risks about themselves, themselves!
     
    casperl, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  6. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3146
    Dude, you came on these boards and lied about seeing a PR update in order to get attention. Your excuse was everyone does it, especially those who start threads. Fact is that no, not everyone does it, most people just don't know what they are looking at.

    I didn't ask you for a screenshot because I thought you were lying... my first impulse is to take people at their word. But as soon as you realized that you couldn't back up what you said, you freaked out. Wtf, get a life already. If you didn't learn this from your parents, lying is rude. As soon as you apologize for doing it I'll more than gladly back off.

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  7. lpstong

    lpstong Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    216
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3147
    Backup what.... Screenshots can be manipulate in Adobe. The proof lies on your shoulders not mine. There is no lies. If so, than you call everyone liars if they have some change in their inner pages and or homepages. Yet you do not call them on it. Nor do you reply to my inquires of your blog post on you blog on Smackdown which is in your sig link but not the direct link to your blog post of causing havoc elsewhere about PR, SEO work etc. So is your blog post a spoof to get attention or what.

    It would be nice to know your experience etc. But yet you have given none. So the "proof" lies on your shoulders and you are lying not me. So I do a saracastic chant to Michael/mvandemar "proof", "proof", "proof" of whether or not if Google does some kind of work on peoples sites before or during google updates. I already given proof of an update of when Google does backlinks and PR updates. So "proof", "proof", "proof" lies on you Michael/mvandemar on you not me.

    I think your direct link to your signature link to your blog is just a draw for attention and for traffic.
     
    lpstong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
    Mong likes this.
  8. Mong

    Mong ↓↘→ horsePower

    Messages:
    4,789
    Likes Received:
    734
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #3148
    :D :D So, you think Google doesn't know about us already?
    And there is no reverse engineering from my side ... actually Google itself provided it open source ;)

    lpstong, tell me in which class you fall?

    Help Page for classifying your class. (Ready from post # 3074) ;)
     
    Mong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
    lpstong likes this.
  9. lpstong

    lpstong Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    216
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3149
    Well it would be a mix. But as of date, I have not lied. Proving with screenshots can be manipulated in Adobe, many know this. Yet Michael/mvandemar has not proven opposite if Google has been checking innerpages or updates. Everyone seems to have a toolbar they prefer: iwebtool, seotool, rustybrink, prchecker, to the googlebar with the pr checker. My question really at hand is who's is really right. It appears that all give different DC updates. mvandemar claims his is more accurate. He uses his site he prefers. So what he perceives is that his is corrrect and that everyone is incorrect. What makes me think that the Google Tooldbar is incorrect. What for the fact it does not list ever DC. I ask that mvandemar prove his point with all the info and correct toolbars as possible. I would suggest to use several PR SEO Tools as oppose to just one. Do not lean so heavily on one. And what appears that mvandemar does not use more than just one SEO tool.

    It appears that there are to many SEO toolbars out there. And that none are to stable and give different PR and at different timing. I try to rely more on the Google Toolbar PR than anything. Which I am sure is not always correct. But I probably rely on it more heavily than any other give SEO site. mvandemar has not proven anything. Nor do I feel I need to give screenshots for I feel they can be manipulated in Adobe.
     
    lpstong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  10. mubin

    mubin Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,434
    Likes Received:
    123
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #3150
    mubin, Apr 25, 2007 IP
    Canadianbacon and Mong like this.
  11. Canadianbacon

    Canadianbacon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    76
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Articles:
    1
    #3151
    No we don't
     
    Canadianbacon, Apr 25, 2007 IP
    mubin likes this.
  12. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3152
    This right here is the problem... you have no clue whatsoever what you are talking about. I didn't call you a liar because you didn't give out a screenshot, I called you a liar initially because when I asked you for a screenshot to help diagnose what you were talking about, you freaked out and started ACTING like a liar. Later on, you made claims that were the opposite of what you had said before:

    The ONLY way that you would know that they were different now is if you had checked them one regular basis. To claim that they were different now, and that this is definitely new data, when you hadn't looked at them before, would be lying. Now, how do I know that you hadn't looked at them before? With the exact same statement that you used in the post I just quoted, and in this one:

    Now what you are doing is demonstrating that not only do you not use these tools (and therefore don't know what they showed in the past), you don't even know what they mean.

    That's fine, no one is requiring you to know what they are or how they work, but guess what, pretending that you know what's going on when you don't is again lying.

    You apparently don't know what a dc is. You don't seem to know what those little numbers with the dots between them that you are looking at are. You certainly don't seem to know why all of these "toolbars" (as in you insist calling them) are, in your words, "unstable". Again, you don't need to know what they are... but since they are the majority of what this thread is about, if you don't know what we're talking about, then you should just keep quiet. Lying about seeing something or pretending to know what you're talking about just so you can join in the conversation is just plain wrong.

    Now, all of that aside, I'm sorry, but your English isn't all that hot, and I have no clue what you are going on about here:

    Yes, that is my blog, why are you obsessed with it? Why do you keep asking me about it? What does this mean, I can't tell what you are asking:

    "but not the direct link to your blog post of causing havoc elsewhere about PR, SEO work etc"

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  13. mhmdkhamis

    mhmdkhamis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #3153
    mong

    how are u man :D

    how your traffics health :D
     
    mhmdkhamis, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  14. Freewebspace

    Freewebspace Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,213
    Likes Received:
    370
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #3154
    Freewebspace, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  15. wacamoi

    wacamoi Peon

    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3155
    One of my site was 0 now still 0
    too bad
     
    wacamoi, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  16. mhmdkhamis

    mhmdkhamis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #3156
    mhmdkhamis, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  17. casperl

    casperl Peon

    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    57
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3157
    I did not say that!

    I would like to see that open source code myself too. Let me know url if you have any.
     
    casperl, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  18. lpstong

    lpstong Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    216
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3158
    No one freaked out other than you. You still are targeting me and now one else that is noticing anything with their sites. Why is that? You are the only one upset asking for screenshots and calling me a liar. And yes you are calling me a liar:
    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=2935679 - a post you say I am lying. You are cetainly not calling me a hot mamma in there. Do you difertiantate between saying someone lies or calling them a liar.
    You pretty much have said I am lying, a liar, lies, any tense of the word lie.

    Nor have you answered anything about your blog. This is like the 3rd or 4th time I have asked about your blog http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/03/26/it-is-on-baby/. Why do you keep ignoring the issue or question. So is the blog post a spoof for a blog post to drive in traffic or what?

    And again until I see your name being a big name like Shoemoney, Cutts or Chow. OR that you are a Google Engineer, what is your point. Others have a flucuation in their sites. Why do you need screenshot? Why are you relying only on what site that covers so many DC's. You have real anger issues of "proof", "proof", "proof". Yet where is your proof of your knowledge. I read through your posts and have found anything to prove otherwise. What is your issue at hand here?

    Through all the posts that you have posted, what is your real point here? To say there is no update or that Google is doing a backlink update? Now dig down real deap and figure out and or tell us what your real point of being on this thread. To discredit everyone? What is it? That you are a real update expert? Really what is it? Just because a handful saw some fluctuations on their sites, you call them liars. You certainly are calling me a liar saying I have lied on more than 2 accounts. Please enlighten the DP community about your SEO expertise and or Update history. So that we may lay or give credit when and where it is due.

    And I really need to stop wasting time on you. You have proven nothing. Other than rampage and trying your best to discredit anyone and everyone in this thread for some apparent reason. For which I have seen no apparent reason to call you a guru of any sort. To say that you have some realistic statements. To say ahhhhhhh you know you maybe right in what you are saying. I do not see any of this in any of your posts to make me lean towards to seeing any of your points, other than saying you are really one upset person of sorts.
     
    lpstong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
  19. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #3159
    Ok, your inability to understand English is driving me crazy. We're going to take this one step at a time.

    Why did I ask you for a screenshot?

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Apr 25, 2007 IP
    Mong likes this.
  20. Mong

    Mong ↓↘→ horsePower

    Messages:
    4,789
    Likes Received:
    734
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #3160
    you CLASS 4. :D :D :D


    Michael, you cannot make them believe that CROWS ARE NOT ALWAYS WHITE. :eek:

    Truth is that PR update started but rolled back ... and hopefully it will restart again. And very few sites still showing change on random time of the day.

    Guys!!! Jump up to Class 3 at least ... ;-)
     
    Mong, Apr 25, 2007 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.