The obstacles and politics of renewable energy technologies

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Gomeza, Sep 27, 2012.

  1. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #21
    Ion beam lithography isn't the future of silicone based CPUs EUV is . The efficiency of the solar cell is reduced by the it's low conversion ratio , if you miniaturize the basic components you can go to a 87% theoretical efficiency. By 2015 silicon would have reach it's maximum, then you can look at lowering costs and improving the technology so you can manufacture it without exotic materials.

    Proprietary tech ? Now that's a good joke . Your precious tech was discover in the 80's , it's been around for 30 years in different stages .
    Here's source good source : http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514266862/isbn9514266862.pdf

    Now go scam so Chinese investors I'm sure they will trust the white devil.
     
    ApocalypseXL, Sep 30, 2012 IP
  2. Gomeza

    Gomeza Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #22
    First CPUs, now printed circuit boards? This would be the second unrelated technology you have introduced as an argument. You really don't have a clue what you are talking about do you buddy? . . . . but somehow you feel the need to keep talking.
     
    Gomeza, Oct 1, 2012 IP
  3. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #23
    You super duper company took and old tech and FAKED that they invented it . Meanwhile you don't have a clue what you're talking about , you wouldn't recognize conversion ratio if it hit you in the face, you also lack any academic backing from a good source . Out of arguments again are you buddy ?

    Out of curiosity besides trying to get Google to index more of this garbage , why else did you opened this thread ?
     
    ApocalypseXL, Oct 1, 2012 IP
  4. mmm555

    mmm555 Member

    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    #24
    It seems like green energy will likely do better in the coming years under Obama, rather than Romney. :)
     
    mmm555, Oct 15, 2012 IP
  5. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #25
    If Obama would have a had medium interest in green energy he would have done something by now. The US is 3rd world country when it comes to energy security and delivery systems - green energy needs those system to be top notch in order for it to work. Obama did nothing to change that , he only used green energy to look cool. Bush did more for green energy in 4 years then Obama will do in 8 ; just one word NIF.
     
    ApocalypseXL, Oct 17, 2012 IP