My take on the sandbox theory is this: New web-sites naturally rank lowly in the Google search engine for competitive terms because people don't genuinely wish to visit them. There is only so much room on the first result page, 10 places, and many web-sites are not cut for that first page. You need to really have a special site in order to rank highly in Google, or be found on the Internet and be widely visited period. Sites that don't have that "star quality" simply exist in the sandbox indefinitely, unseen and unvisited. The Internet has a sort of sandbox effect as well as Google. If your site isn't great, it won't be found. I'm not bashing new web-sites. I'm simply stating a truth that most sites are not as great as they could be. What is your take on "star quality," the kind of presence that a web-site needs in order to be found on the Internet?