I don't know, but do you have a forum where people discuss the pros and cons of slaughtering puppies and kittens and making children watch? I'm sure that's useful to the recipient sometimes as long as the slaughterer can be identified...
There's spam there's spam. I was thinking about sending a 100 emails to researched receivers who could well be interested in my project which involves no financial outlay and worried about being labelled a spammer. Then I read of a man from Seatle who sent 9 million in the last 3 months. Some people in this debate are not able to differentiate between spams. They enjoy displaying their self-righteous views from their percieved moral high grounds and are closed to any debate. They must be able to understand the huge differences between the given examples - mucstn't they?