The goal of USA? (Or at least those in the Europe)

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by jawednazarali, Sep 8, 2006.

  1. bobby9101

    bobby9101 Peon

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    134
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #61
    however is it our responsibility to help others? no, but our generousity.
    i think that America was being generous in its efforts towards other nations.
    do you think Americans don't know that it costs us money and lives to fight?
     
    bobby9101, Sep 11, 2006 IP
  2. mistermix

    mistermix Active Member

    Messages:
    2,326
    Likes Received:
    85
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #62
    I agree with your sentiments but think instead of using tax money to fund wars abroad we should allocate the money to humanitarian causes abroad. Imagine the good 250,000 troops could do in helping people get access to food and water etc.
     
    mistermix, Sep 11, 2006 IP
  3. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #63
    you don't help anyone by chancing your very own national security
     
    Blogmaster, Sep 11, 2006 IP
  4. bobby9101

    bobby9101 Peon

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    134
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #64
    well said ^^ well said
     
    bobby9101, Sep 11, 2006 IP
  5. mistermix

    mistermix Active Member

    Messages:
    2,326
    Likes Received:
    85
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #65
    You are deluded if you think starting a war in Iraq will lead to less people wanting to harm America.

    You are deluded if you think your president took your troops into Iraq to prevent terrorist attacks on the US.
     
    mistermix, Sep 11, 2006 IP
  6. jawednazarali

    jawednazarali Guest

    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #66
    responsibility, Yes you have to make up for your mistakes.

    Generousity wrong word selected.
    A person destroys your home/family/future then gives you money(as loan) and take it back (with intrest), he can't be generous?

    Cost and lives to fight, thats the price you have to pay when you devastate millions of people around the world.

    I suggest you better study the politics, economics and yes history before using the word generous.
     
    jawednazarali, Sep 11, 2006 IP
  7. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #67
    It was illegal, what more do you want me to say? It is illegal under the geneva convention to attack a country with the aim of destabilising their government. I don't know what else to say on the matter. Are you now saying that it is ok to break the law in certain circumstances?

    Saddam Hussain was a threat to no one but his own people. WMD's have never been found, facilities for the making of WMD's have never been found. WHY? Maybe because they were never there to begin with?
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  8. Arnie

    Arnie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    116
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #68
    To Young to understand your medieval approach in the 21st century
    and stupid that I haven't realized that years ago.

    What about you? Have you searched your mohammad yet.
    Chose your language and there you go ...
    Be fair and enter the dialogue in civilised manner
     
    Arnie, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  9. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #69
    Here here! I scoff everytime I hear people saying the world is a safer place.

    I lived through IRA terrorism in the late 70's 80's and 90's. AMERICAN FUNDED terrorism as well funded via Noraid, good job there was no war on terrorism then as Britain would be attacking America to dry up the funds going to the IRA!

    America has woken up to terrorism because it came to their door. It came to their door because of their middle East policy. WHy can they not see what is happening? America were shipping rockets to Israel, and bringing them in through a UK airbase. If America stopped shipping rockets to Israel, stop this limitless backing of Israel, THEN the world would be a safer place.

    The Israeli power brokers in the American government are pulling the strings here, them and the arms manufacturers (who are often one and the same). Regardless of the reality, the perception is that America is backing a war against Islam.

    The time for fighting has passed, *if there ever was a time). to defeat terrorism, you MUST talk to the terrorists. If nothing else was learned from the troubles in Ireland, THIS was! We now have peace in Ireland, the only sporadic outbursts are nothing to do with the troubles, and everything to do with gangs and turf wars. But We have peace!

    America must talk to the people they are fighting. They must call a truce across the world, they must call for talks in Iraq. Over 100 innocent civilians every day are being murdered in Iraq. and unless we call for all party talks it will escalate into a full blown civil war.
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  10. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #70
    Apart from being illegal, with the war in Iraq Bush and Blair took their eyes off the ball in the 'War On Terror' Bin Laden was still in Afganistan along with the terrorist training camps, yet suddenly all eyes, attention and cash was diverted to Iraq.

    This whole war is a crazy idea anyway. Didn't the USA learn the lessons of Vietnam? You can't fight an enemy that doesn't want to stand and fight. You'll lose every time. It takes covert action to beat guerrillas and terrorists.
     
    MattUK, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  11. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #71
    Matt, again you post logic. :) Of course logic flies in the face of the US war machine :(
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  12. bobby9101

    bobby9101 Peon

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    134
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #72
    I believe all do not understand vietnam.
    America did not start the war in vietnam. We first went there to bail out the french, yes we wanted to stop communism, but we went over to help the french. It later escalated.
     
    bobby9101, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  13. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #73
    Understanding it's origins are different to understanding tactics and strategy. Whatever it's origins doesn't change the fact that conventional warfare is next to useless against a fragmented and non-defined enemy.
     
    MattUK, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  14. bobby9101

    bobby9101 Peon

    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    134
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #74
    true... but vietnam was not an american use of it's "war machine"
     
    bobby9101, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  15. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #75
    What do you define 'war machine' as, it was a war, nothing more nothing less.
     
    MattUK, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  16. Red Fairy

    Red Fairy Peon

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #76
    where did you live ireland or england
     
    Red Fairy, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  17. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #77
    Wales I'd guess judging by his name.
     
    MattUK, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  18. Red Fairy

    Red Fairy Peon

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #78
    well if it is wales the IRA were more active in ireland and england not scotland or wales
     
    Red Fairy, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  19. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #79
    I lived in Wales, My friends were in Rutherglen St in Belfast just off the falls rd. My Brother was in The Army, so we spent a lot of time in Woolwich where he was posted . So yep, I saw it from lots of sides sadly.

    You are dead right though, the IRA NEVER attacked their celtic cousins in their homelands it was confined to Ireland and England.

    Would you agree that the only way to peace is negotiation? (be carefull what you say as my Neighbour is Peter Haine, the minister for Northern Ireland LOL)
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Sep 12, 2006 IP
  20. MattUK

    MattUK Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,950
    Likes Received:
    377
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    275
    #80
    I don't think he's saying he was affected by it, rather having lived in the areas that would have received news coverage. I don't live in Iraq but I follow the news.
     
    MattUK, Sep 12, 2006 IP