The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11

Hi

What are your thoughts about this article?

Thanks

Bri



A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.

The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards.

Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)

"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)


Read more at whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

 

On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

LOL!

 

Yeah those dam baby eater jooz..


Funny thing I can not find a single credible source for this news...

 

These are the only dancin' people I remember on 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyaixXr6PvI

 

Do you have a source for that quote?

 

Yeah.. What Really Happened... see the box on the top of page

if you mean any 'Credible' source.. I am not aware of any....

 

Holy shyt...

http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=R2nVkN983fU

Three years ago, on September 12, 2001, Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked how the previous day’s terror attacks in New York and Washington would affect relations between Israel and the United States. "It's very good," he said. "Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy." The attack, Mr. Netanyahu explained, would "strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive haemorrhaging of terror."

http://www.nologo.org/newsite/detaild.php?ID=410

 

Yeah, I actually meant a credible source.

A youtube video? Come on, surely you can do better than that.

 

I have no idea whether the quote is true or not, but the blatant misspelling of "Stepember" in the video doesn't help me to trust the source

EDIT: Can anyone confirm that the quote at the end of the video "our purpose was to document the event" is actually what he is saying? I don't see how he isn't immediately guilty of foreknowledge is the quote is correct.

 

Uhhh.. a UT00b propaganda video, I think nothing can be more credible than it.. Nice Find, Very interesting, Excellent, thanks for sharing, Amazing.. yada yada yada.

Although I was hoping to see an interview video where he actually said that...

 

I wasn´t backing up the quote with the youtube video - it was just an interesting watch.

Somehow you guys missed the link at the bottom of the quote:

http://www.nologo.org/newsite/detaild.php?ID=410


http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0909-04.htm

“It's very good,” he said. “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.” The attack, Mr. Netanyahu explained, would “strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive haemorrhaging of terror.” Common wisdom has it that after September 11, a new era of geo-politics was ushered in, defined by what is usually called “the Bush Doctrine”: pre-emptive wars, attacks on “terrorist infrastructure” (read: entire countries), an insistence that all the enemy understands is force.

 

No, I didn't miss it. But its as credible as uT00b video..

The Articles doesn't provide the source of information.

Had he said it on TV, in an interview, to press? Had it appeared in any news source? Or just some people dreamed of it that they didn't realize was a dream?

Funny thing in the 2nd link:

 

what a load of crock....how about a credible source?

 

Ok losers...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...nd+between+our+two+peoples&btnG=Google+Search

#2 is nytimes article - read the description - is that credible enough?

 

The Credible source says something very different

 

Everyone is missing the point. If you assume the quote is real; I havent looked and I don't care enough to do so:

When ()s are added to a quote, it's the writer who is added it, for that is their perceived context. Usually it fits just fine and is ignored. In this case; whomever added (for Israel) is simply showing their bias in attempting to change the context.

And we have someone who is just eating it up.

 

People have been trying to spin the reactions to the attacks since the afternoon of 9/11. I remember just a few hours after the attacks someone at my work place said they had heard the Muslim owners of the local Dunkin Donuts were dancing and singing in the back room after the attacks. There was never any credible evidence to back this up, but it just shows how quickly disinformation can be spread by people who have a motive to spread it.

 

What do you mean?? Look at the title and the description - its a cache from the article itself.

Spilled Blood Is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer
He predicted that the attack would "strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United ...

Why would NYtimes quote something which is supposedly heresay?

But the quote continues, and its clear what he means.. And he obviously doesnt mean sympathy for Iraq or anywhere else - so who could he mean it would "generate immediate sympathy" for?

“It's very good,” he said. “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.” The attack, Mr. Netanyahu explained, would “strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive haemorrhaging of terror.”

There isn´t much more to debate over here.

 

Have you read the article? or just copied the snippet from google?

I'm posting the abstract from the NYtimes page..

It's simple, Israel is affected from Terrorism for longer than US.. The same goes with India, so anyone can conclude that (after attacks) US would share the same point of view as these countries.. Even if he said that, he was merely hoping that it would generate a better bounding between both countries as terrorism being common enemy of both. Unlike Palestinians, he wasn't rejoicing and celebrating the attacks..

But heck.. those dem joozs...

 

I copied the snippet from Google which was taken from the NYtimes page - when was the last time you saw Google index content that wasnt there?