you know when you have a crackpot when they tie current haliburton to Cheney's income - if that is true then show us where since he has to show that income if he is getting it.
You just don't understand do you lorien, sticking to the sheeple line. This man was responsible for 3,000 deaths of innocent people (mainly Americans) Bush said he would find him dead or alive, just 6 months after the event Bush says that he don't think about him too much. When are you going to wake up mate? This guy should be found at all costs and brought to justice. You seem to fail to realise the importance of this. Say (for example, I don't know if you did or didn't lose a loved one on 9/11) and you see Bush saying that he will find him at all costs and bring him back dead or alive. Then just 6 months later the fuck is saying that he doesn't think about him (Bin Laden) too much. Surely you would ask why? The real truth is that Bin Laden was a patsy and used for the invasion of Afghanistan, now he is no longer needed as he served his purpose. And no amount of shitty tin foil and other dumb pics will change that. You sheeple need a kick up the arse IMO.
So, you think Alex Jones did it? He has earned a fortune on his 9/11 movies and he also "predicted" it Seriously, even if some people may benefit for a crime, it doesn't make them responsible. You need more evidence than that, if you want any success in a court. 1. Atleast mention Al Qaeda, not Arabs. 2. Do you think that murders that serves long prison terms have benefitted from it? 3. How would Al Qaeda know how the world would respond. Seems, like you have picked up some demolition bullshit somewhere. What looks fishy doesn't have to be fishy, the reverse is also valid in some cases. I have debunked demolition theories about WTC for a long time and I haven't been impressed by any such theory. Not only that almost all demolition experts doesn't agree with CD theories, I've also find it hard to believe due to no evidence on planted bombs, such as seismological evidence, which rather disproves those theories. The world was different back in 2001. Countries were preparing for state-to-state wars, not much fuzz about terrorism. And again, failure is not evidence in this case.
You are just expressing your BDS and I understand this AGS, so I am being patient here. But really, think about things a little. If OBL is in Pakistan and we have an agreement, with an ally - why would we violate it for 1 person? Do we start a civil war within Pakistan? How many troops are you willing to have die to get this 1 guy? Will terrorism stop if he's captured or killed? If you are capable of thinking beyond your "sheeple" and cheney hitlerburton arguments, you can answer those very simple questions for me. I've asked, I think 7 times now, and you have yet to answer.
Giving terrorist's credit away, again? Are these the same soldiers you called "turkeys" last week? The same soldiers you seem to take delight in seeing killed, as reflected in your posts?
LOL, no post in P&R is complete without GTech posting in it. I don't take delight in seeing anyone killed in this disaster. These soldiers are turkeys to Bush, he don't care about them, he only sees them as numbers in his quest to take over the Middle East. And the biggest culprits are people like you and your chums here that keep posting to defend Bush. I got banned from the www.ebaumsworld.com forums last summer for exposing an FBI mole who was posting lots of crap defending the lies and deception of Bush, you sound a lot to me like the guy I rumbled. Coming to think of it your posting style was very much the same with the same M.O: Jump in on any thread that is anti-Bush and defend him staunchly at all costs. Mmmmm, I smell a rat here. I doubt you are FBI (to be honest I don't think you have a high enough level of intelligence) but you are doing a great job defending the neocons. You might even get a medal if you get over 10,000 posts mate. I can always try and get you a job here mate but I do not come cheap, it's gonna cost ya guvnor.
How sad. AGS is even not entertaining enough for a joke site AGS paranoia is reaching a boiling point. Watch out people!
They had a serious forum in there too mate, more damn sheeeeple than you could shake a shitty stick at, you and your chums would have loved it in there. It's common knowledge over there mate, I was a legend for outing the slippery sod. Most people know that GTech and d16man post hundreds of worthless posts every month trying to defend Bush and his lies and corruption. This dude posted even more than the 2 of them put together! It was shocking mate. Not a pretty sight.
That's soooo nasty AGS. This is a family forum! Maybe they are capable of answering a few questions though; which you have successfully dodged for the 7th time
LOL nice attempt at misquoting me. Deception like that would not look out of place in the White House mate.
I'm just saying his Cheney's buddies benefitted. Unfortunately he hasn't mailed his tax returns to me from 2006 yet so I can't give you figures. Of course he is smart enough not to take direct payments. My only point is to check who benefits from terrorism. The only people who benefit are defense contractors and oil companies. War has often been a business decision. Thanks for the "crackpot" remark. Real classy. Anyone with a different point of view than you is crazy. As for Latehorn's post, I'm sorry that for some reason you thought I was presenting an entire criminal case in just a few paragraphs. I was merely trying to open some narrow minds. I am open to all theories on the subject, I'm just saying a lot of things don't add up. WT7 did not get hit by a plane, so no, i didnt' pick up some demo crap on the net. I'm just saying things aren't always as they seem and we'll probably never really know exactly what happened. I agree, that just because someone benefitted from the crime doesn't mean they are guilty. I am just saying its a good idea to keep an eye on them. I am not claiming any one thing is true, just saying keep an open mind. That's all. Sorry that we're all "crackpots" for thinking differently than the corporate media. P.S. Sorry that some link keeps popping up at the top of my post, something weird is happening. I certainly don't endorse them.
These sheeple do not look beyond the extent of their own noses mate. Look at this, here is a full text of Dick Cheney's speech at the Institute of Petroleum Autumn lunch, 1999 by Dick Cheney http://www.energybulletin.net/559.html Here is what Cheney said at that speech in 1999: Cheney isn't stupid, he might be a vile and very very dangerous arrogant man but stupid he is not. He knew back in 1999, probably way before that too. And now we are supposed to be surprised that the USA is bedding down in the Middle East. It only takes a bit of research to figure out what these crazy bastards are doing, but the damn sheeple are so blind they ain't got a fookin clue. ** = Until 9/11
I know many people who would disagree with me in many areas that I don't consider or call crackpots. I reserve that for those who really are. If you sound like AGS you will definitely come across as a crackpot. I trust the media less than you do- it is very liberal minded, very much for their own gain and to push people to their way of thinking. Let me ask you this - what do you think of homeschooling? (of subject but I am trying to make a point) p.s. what links are on your post? - I see nothing here.
Yeah just ignore me teamdesign, I'm a crackpot because I don't agree with debunked and all his filthy neocon/PNAC supporting lunatic chums.
I don't agree that the media is very liberal, it is to a certain degree but some channels (Fox) are basically cheering sections for the neocons. Fox news isn't news, it's Rupert Murdoch's propaganda machine. If you listen to Fox talk about New Orleans they make it sound like there's a revival down there and everything is great. If you talk to someone who is actually there though you would know that it is actually more like a third world country and things are very bad there. But that can be said for liberal stations as well. YOu can't trust anyone any more, although I guess you never could. Media is entertainment, and sensationalism sells the most. So we're stuck with hearing both sides of sensationalized news and somewhere in between the liberal and conservative sensationalism lies the truth. The media is extremely powerful and its upsetting to me that people take what the news stations say as truth. It's entertainment. To answer the homeschooling question, I guess I am fine with it. I really don't think about it too much. I know that the schools systems are kind of a joke and some are dangerous, so i see why people do it. (and I don't trust history books either) I don't have kids so I don't know what they are teaching them these days, I am sure i'll have more of an opinion on it someday when I see what kids have to read these days. The links in the post that I was talking about I have been able to edit them out. But its weird, everytime I post to DP this week it adds a line above everything I type about "LOL look...." and it names a website, which I don't want to mention because I don't want to help them out. Not sure if its my computer doing that or something in DP.