Texas Authorities Raid Polygamist Compound(400 kids taken from a polygamist compound)

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by ziya, Apr 7, 2008.

  1. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #121
    stOx, Apr 18, 2008 IP
  2. ClarasMommy

    ClarasMommy Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #122
    Do you support the government taking away your children with out any solid proof that they have been abused?
     
    ClarasMommy, Apr 18, 2008 IP
  3. ziya

    ziya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #123
    Sect children will stay in state custody, judge rules

    Hundreds of children who were taken from a polygamist ranch by Texas child welfare authorities will remain in state custody, a judge ruled Friday night.
    Judge Barbara Walther also ordered court DNA testing for all 416 children who lived at the YFZ (Yearning For Zion) Ranch in Eldorado to determine their biological parents.
    The compound is run by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- a Mormon offshoot that practices polygamy.
    Walther made her ruling after two days of testimony at a hearing to determine whether the children were properly removed by child welfare authorities.
    Walther said she found sufficient evidence for Texas Child Protective Services to keep custody of the children.
    Officials are now looking for "the very best temporary placements for these children," said Marleigh Meisner, CPS spokeswoman.
    "This is not about religion -- this is about keeping children safe from abuse," she added.

    Full text : http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/18/polygamy.custody/index.html
     
    ziya, Apr 18, 2008 IP
  4. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #124
    Are you claiming there isn't enough proof to warrant the protective intervention?
     
    northpointaiki, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  5. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #125
    gworld, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  6. kaethy

    kaethy Guest

    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #126
    How do you overlook the clear evidence of child abuse in the form of pregnant teenage girls with babies & toddlers in tow?

    When the investigators asked for a 16 year old girl named Sarah, the men replied there were no Sarah's at all. Turns out 5 girls are named Sarah, and at least one of them has a child.

    If there was no child abuse, why would the men lie when they asked for any teenage girl named Sarah?

    Because they know what they are doing is wrong, and they were trying not to get caught.
     
    kaethy, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  7. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #127
    Let's arrest everybody in state of Nevada and put every child in that state under state care. :rolleyes:

    I almost forgot that teenage pregnancy rate among blacks is 134 per 1,000, so we shouldn't forget to arrest all blacks too.
     
    gworld, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  8. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #128
    I have made it perfectly clear many times that nobody besides their leader is currently guilty of anything. I made it perfectly clear that the only action i currently support is the investigation of a cult accused, suspected and in one case proven to be sexually abusing children. But don't let facts and the truth stop you being an intellectually dishonest liar.

    Yes. Do you support the government doing nothing in face of claims that your children are being systematically sexually abused and beaten?
     
    stOx, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  9. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #129
    You should stop looking in the mirror while you are posting. :rolleyes:
     
    gworld, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  10. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #130
    Uh oh, It appears a seven year old has taken control of gworlds computer. He must have outsmarted him....
     
    stOx, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  11. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #131
    No, it is me but I take no credit for outsmarting you since any child can outsmart you. :rolleyes::D
     
    gworld, Apr 19, 2008 IP
  12. ziya

    ziya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #132
    Dozens of sect children moved to foster care
    About 100 of the 437 children taken from a polygamist sect's Texas ranch amid allegations of sexual abuse were moved Tuesday to foster homes, the Texas Department of Health and Family Services said. But a spokesman for the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints families quickly criticized the transfer.

    "This was done without prior notice to their attorneys or to their families," Rod Parker said.
    He accused the state's Child Protective Services Department of being "afraid of due process."
    The FLDS also launched a Web site this week to promote its side of the issue.The site contains photos and videos taken inside the YFZ (Yearning For Zion) Ranch near Eldorado, Texas, during the raid earlier this month.
    Officials have revised the number of children taken from the FLDS compound, which originally stood at 416.
    The initial count was rushed, they said, and they have discovered that some females were not 18 or older, as they claimed. Those young women are now being counted as minors.
    The children moved Tuesday have already had DNA samples taken as part of ongoing testing to determine their biological parents, officials said.

    They were loaded onto buses and moved from San Angelo Coliseum, where they were being held.

    full text : http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/22/polygamy.testing/index.html
     
    ziya, Apr 23, 2008 IP
  13. Mr_2

    Mr_2 Peon

    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #133
    Mr_2, Apr 23, 2008 IP
  14. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #134
    stOx, Apr 24, 2008 IP
  15. Mr_2

    Mr_2 Peon

    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #135
    yes yes :Dthats what someone said somedays ago...

    ps. rush and edit your posts.... :D:D
     
    Mr_2, Apr 24, 2008 IP
  16. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #136
    There wasn't any reason to assume the police fabricated the call and your post proves they didn't. In fact, The police done the exact opposite. They have come out and said that the call may have been made by someone outside of the ranch, Though that is yet to be proven.

    Regardless though;
    "facts surrounding the first phone call had become irrelevant because the raid turned up independent evidence that underage girls had been impregnated."

    "The removal was based on our investigation. It was not based on the initial call,"
     
    stOx, Apr 24, 2008 IP
  17. korr

    korr Peon

    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    38
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #137
    Someone needs to go raid the public high schools & save the kids from that environment too, then.
     
    korr, Apr 24, 2008 IP
  18. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #138
    I'm sure if it was systematic and suspected of being a fundamental aspect of that particular school they would raid it.
     
    stOx, Apr 24, 2008 IP
  19. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #139
    What is irrelevant is that there should be no investigation without probable cause. And if the phone call was bogus, there was not probable cause.

    I have little doubt this case will be swept under the rug because the state doesn't seem to have enough evidence to justify taking these kids away from their parents.
     
    guerilla, Apr 24, 2008 IP
  20. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #140
    This is flawed.

    Probable cause is a standard by which authorities may reasonably believe a crime may have been committed, or is in the process of being committed, warranting an investigation.

    The probable cause was tripped by the phone call. An investigation ensued. The decision to remove was based on the investigation, and not the phone call. If the phone call later turned out to be from a loon, this doesn't negate the right action, in this case, of a phone call that expressed an imminent danger to the children, calling in a rightful response; the response and subsequent investigation warranted removal in the judgment of local authority.

    I get wisps of Waco reminiscence here. There, an investigation was tripped under probable cause when the local sheriff's department was apparently tipped by a UPS driver that a package containing illegal ordinance broke open on delivery to the compound. It was reasonable to initiate an investigation. That the ATF blew it later on does not negate the initial probable cause, tripping a rightful initial investigation.

    It is interesting to me that many of the people on this forum who most vociferously call for further investigations into 9/11 conspiracy theories, deny even initial investigatory diligence in this instance.
     
    northpointaiki, Apr 24, 2008 IP