Texas Authorities Raid Polygamist Compound(400 kids taken from a polygamist compound)

Some times is moral, some times is legal, some times moral is wrong and legal is right, some times moral is right and legal is wrong, it all depends on how I feel and from which side the winds blows.

 

No, I reported this one, you know, the one where I pointed up your fucked up "statist" paranoia, and the dogshit coming from you and Guerilla, as evidenced by your disgusting statements on this thread?

Boy - as I said, I know you swing a certain way, but you'll need to drop the fantasies over me - my age, what I wear when training - just not going to happen.

 

Fantastic dodge Rebecca.

In the spirit of debate, it has to be a give and take. Otherwise, you're conducting an interrogation, and I don't come to this forum to be interrogated.

Not at all. I said that if you're going to make the legal argument, then logically, you must believe that law is correct. If you pick and choose which laws you like, then you can't argue to the authority of the law, because you don't recognize it's authority yourself.

Which would leave you with the moral argument.

It's a tricky thing, saying "because it's illegal". That's an argument to the law.

Still, you brought up the law, and if you still believe it is illegal, then you should be willing to explain the paradox of different state laws, at least as far as which law you believe is correct.

You may think it is ridiculous, which is an adequate defense, if you can point out what you believe to contrast it. Thus far, it hasn't been a question you are willing to answer.

 

You flatter yourself too much, probably part of your over estimating yourself including intellectually. Just because I try to teach you what kind of top is better match for your skirt, doesn't mean that I have any kind of fantasy about you. I promise that it is only wishful thinking from your side and I have no such desire.

P.S. how is it going with my breakfast?

 

It couldn't be any simpler a question:

The answer should be "no." Especially when that 14 year old is raised in a situation where every aspect of her life is under the control of another, to the point where her own identity is lost to her. Such as obtains:

 

Skirts, making you breakfast, the color of my clothing, am I underage...

Dude - for the love of god, Guerilla said he's lived alone the last 16 years, and he's obviously got a hankering for some Gworld-style lovin', hit him up, and quit knocking at my door. I'm not available.

 

For my part, I hope they won't ban you, every forum needs a clown.

 

Aren't you some kind of karate kid master chef? If you don't want to have your skirts on, I don't care, put a pants or a dress on and hurry up and make my breakfast.

 

I know, I know. Lick your wounds some other way and hook up with Guerilla.

 

poor little karate kid, wax on, wax off. It is quite obvious who is licking his wounds.

 

You think I'm dodging, when you still won't answer a simple yes or no question? O.k. I pick law. We are talking about a compound in Texas that is under Texas law. A 40 yr. old is having sex with a 14 yr. old in Texas and that is illegal in Texas, it doesn't really matter what the laws regarding this are in Bangledash. I win. Now do you think the same scenario should be made legal? You could just type Y or N. Thanks

 

Now you want me to undress from my hakama, and dress to fulfill your fantasy. Great.

Can't you just pay for this on dialup?

Anyone else needing a shower?

Oh, god, I said shower. Now Gworld's going to need a respirator.

Anyway, little dude, while fun, I do have other things to do than fight your advances off. Congrats on boring me to tears.

 

I'm literally in tears here. Funny stuff.

I've never seen a guy try so hard to get banned and fail. Maybe he will have better luck tomorrow. rotflmao

 

Can you prove that the 40 years old had sex with 14 years old in Texas? May be they went to south Carolina to have sex which makes it legal.

 

So is Gworld - but I won't date him, either. I sent him your way, as it's an obvious love thing.

Now, Rebecca posed you a very simple question:

In the vernacular, just answer the fucking question. Or, do what you always do, and slither on to some other topic until you dodge that as well.

 

Did you get too many blows to your head while trying to become the karate kid? I don't care what you wear or what you call your skirt, hakama is it?
Just harry up and make my damn breakfast.

 

I wanted to post the same thing to you, answer my fu*king questions but after considering your history as karate kid and the fact that you have received too many blows to your head, I thought it is no idea to humiliate you.

 

English, much?

Hopeful if you keep diluting this thread, your love buddy won't have to speak for himself?

 

I think you know you are dodging.

So then you think California law is wrong? And you think gay sex is illegal as in Texas?

Not quite. You chose the authority of law. It means you support all Texas laws. Right? and does it also mean you think the California law is wrong? Because California law is different than Texas law. They can't both be right if they are different, unless you can explain what I am missing...

This is what I warned about when choosing the law. You're arguing to authority. But in regards to these laws, there is no authoritative yes/no, right/wrong.

Yes. I think it should be legal.

As an aside, I can't understand for the life of me, what the obsession with 40 or 70 years old is.

If you're going to argue to the law, 17 and 16 in Texas is illegal. I have yet to hear of a stat rape law that accommodates different age ranges.

Is it because old men are "icky"? "Creepy?" "Sad?"????

Gworld's already addressed this by citing (iirc) SC law. The FLDS folks could move there, and old men could have sex with 14 year olds, and all you guys could do is gnash your teeth. But it's the law.

So how can people arguing to the law reconcile that? If it's bad law in SC, maybe it's bad law in Texas too. I don't understand how anyone making a moral argument (which is what everyone is really doing, the law is a temporary refuge) can believe that it is right in one state, wrong in another, and be ok with that.​

 

Ok, I try to explain it for you since the concept is too complicated for you. I am sorry that I have to be harsh but it is for your own good.
You simply look ridiculous in your skirt trying to act tough. Nobody thinks that you are really the karate kid and instead we just consider you a laughing stock. Therefore, for your own sake stop with this nonsense and go fix my breakfast instead.