Terrorism isn't as bad as drunk driving deaths!

Baseline is 2001-2005.

 

Excellent. What about the rest of the details?

 

LOL, so other posters in this forum are also idiots with exception of you and in the mean time the history of your moronic posts is here for everyone to read and judge.

 

Excellent, How about the budget spent by US on the researches and prevention of cancer within this period?

Can you give me stats?

 

All the details, including the baseline that you again asked for are already in my original post.

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=3963012&postcount=335

 

I think she was generalizing and "other" idiots was a way of referring to you.

 

You should put this in your signature. It pretty much shows what kind of person you are, calling people idiots because they "made" you.

 

At least read the posts moron, it was very obvious who she was referring to.

 

Yes, it was, wasn't it... You don't even know when you've been owned even when it is pointed out to you...

 

I let others look at your posts and confirm what I have always known:

"you are a clueless moron".

 

Your original post:

I am sorry, but it seems I still am not clear what is needed for a reasonable comparison, in my opinion.

I asked as an example of the problem comparing these deaths, (yet it is not limited to these) -

• Does military death counts?
• Will the terrorists' death count?
• Will the incidental deaths count?
• What about those that die a couple of days after from injuries?
• What about deaths a couple of weeks,
• months or
• years from complications?
• What if one lost a kidney and spleen damaged, but dies 40 years later from intestinal cancer.
• Would that be the result from the damages of the injuries suffered, or not?
• Will you consider death from aortic aneurysm of a fat smoker from smoke,
• fat, or
• both, making her die twice?
• What about influenza or pneumonia of a 97 year old smoker?
• Will that count as death from smoking related death,
• old age,
• or both?

Your response seems quite short for 16 points. Of course, as I have stated, I am not going to research the information.

Additionally the above list is not an exhaustive list of comparison problems to create an appropriate baseline.


Again, I am not interested proving or disproving your political point.

I am simply stressing the need for all of us to review our sources with caution.

 

Anger is not the answer. Why not take a day off to cool off and reflect. Have a beer and try to relax (assuming you are old enough..) Perhaps a root beer float might better suit you.

Follow up on one of those Xanax spam offers while you are at it. You don't have to be angry all the time. People might actually start to like you if you start acting a little more civilized and grown up.

 

You have 3 now? Who is this "we"? Oh, I get it. You were just bonding with the older members. I think they know who you are by now, too. They are probably too proud to admit it.
Good luck with developing your own personality and learning some manners! You need those even on a forum.

 

Katy this is for you:

Woman! Take Heed!

 

OK, I had a beer and I am relaxed, so I will tell you this calmly and without any anger:

"You are a clueless moron."

 

Looking in the mirror again.

 

Something tells me there is no hope for you.