Terror attack foiled (some will be angry haha)

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Toopac, Jun 29, 2007.

  1. N_F_S

    N_F_S Active Member

    Messages:
    2,475
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #101
    what for ?? Why should I care about someone miles away from me, if every country would be caring like US & UK do, you know what the planet Earth would be like...They were living like that for many centuries and now is the time to FIX them ? Ok, fine, fix them, but dont be surprised after something blows up, you knew what you were going for.

    I am saying to fight it, but not by sending troops over there, harden your borders, check for every muslim that arrives in your country, if you dont like them that much, etc.
     
    N_F_S, Jul 2, 2007 IP
  2. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #102
    NFS. I believe you do care though. You are always very sympathetic with your posts towards others. It's just a shame of "who" you are sympathetic towards.

    What would Elvis say?

    "I said a hunka hunka burnin' love!"
     
    GTech, Jul 2, 2007 IP
  3. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #103
    Naturally, how much do you think this guy was paid (or was he MI5):

    [​IMG]

    I'd say it's better to take the fight to them, it's what they want no?
     
    Toopac, Jul 2, 2007 IP
  4. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #104
    no its not better, maybe it would be better if you were actually fighting a country with clear leadership

    bring the fight to them, is expensive, ineffective, you end up killing innocents which helps the terrorists recruit more

    please explain how invading iraq would possibly prevent attacks similar to these?
     
    ferret77, Jul 2, 2007 IP
  5. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #105
    I think your getting confused with Afghanistan.

    Then why do you give a sh*t about Iraq then?
     
    Toopac, Jul 2, 2007 IP
  6. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #106
    Just found this on the net, posted by some Anon dude, well put together and very on the money:

    "Anonymous said...

    This whole business is getting more and more wierd. An Iranian doctor. An Iraqi doctor. A Jordanian doctor. According to the BBC, other suspects may be doctors. A conspiracy of doctors. Pretty odd combination.

    From the beginning, I wondered just why these incidents had taken place at this time. Specifically, what motivated these particular individuals to do these things at this particular time.

    The BBC/UK news media of course does not speculate on this very important point. Instead, they try to create an atmosphere of 'panic' at the terrorist threat.

    The reaction of the authorities is predictably causing much much more disruption that the original incidents. Journalists on UK television make comments to the effect that 'You can drive up to a railway station and get on a train without going through any security checks' as if this was totally outrageous and with the obvious implication that they feel that everybody should go through airport style security checks before getting on a train (Can you imagine the scenes at underground stations in the rush hour?? ... talk about disruption).

    The police are stopping and searching vehicles of 'suspicious looking' (i.e. Muslim looking)persons, therefore further alienating such persons.

    The media accuse terrorists of wanting to take away our freedoms and liberties ... I think the government are managing quite well at doing that.

    Call me irresponsible if you wish, but I think the government should do NOTHING beyond conducting a normal police investigation into these events.

    If armed robbers had driven a car through the glass window of a shop and the car had been on fire, would the same reaction have taken place. We all know that it would not.

    Yet we are all required to 'panic' and put up with more and more infringements on our freedom because of these incidents which killed nobody and were so incompetent that I seriously doubt that they were intended to kill anybody.

    It strikes me that whoever is really behind these attacks (the motives of the organiser/paymaster and the 'mules' who carried these attacks out may not necessarily be the same) wants to make sure that the Gordon Brown govenment continues to have to face a 'terrorist' threat .... just in case they should get any ideas to distance themselves from certain parties ....
    "


    And this dude made a point too:

    "Anonymous said...
    And with every pathetic 'terrorist outrage' after another after 9/11 being tied to 'Al Queda' ( (c)FBI ) we start to see how outstanding the military precision of 9/11/2001 was compared to the continuing amateur crap ever since.

    We all know why there is a huge proficiency gap between 9/11 and all the sad excuses for terror since. The UK and US governments will need to allow another professionally produced event to happen soon to keep the public on tieir toes and in their place."



    Source:
    http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2007/07/scotland-yard-bombers-laughable-likely.html

    With all the utterly fake BS "so called" attacks that have failed miserably we should all be worried that something big like another 9/11 will happen because a lot of the sheeple are getting apathetic to ridiculous failures and impossible threats like the utterly laughable "liquid bomb plot." :rolleyes:

    I'm scared of what the NWO have lined up for us in the near future, we should all be. And a message for the crazy gang from AGS, this is not a dig at Bush (for a change :p) Bush is the dog shit level in this, he's just the face, the muppet in the public eye, a bit like the dipshit member of the gang that is a bit dumb and is willing to take a knock for the team. ;)
     
    AGS, Jul 2, 2007 IP
  7. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #107
    It's probably wrote by someone we know;)

    Anonymous comments are ten a penny on the net:rolleyes:
     
    Toopac, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  8. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #108
    Is this what AGS is reduced to? Random postings online to justify his beliefs?

    AGS loves being a willing accomplice, doesn't he?
     
    lorien1973, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  9. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #109
    Indeed. He's made no attempt to hide the fact that he is utterly distraught that his buds have been caught.
     
    GTech, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  10. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #110
    Nonsense. I am merely pointing out the timing of the "attacks" and the utter incompetence in which they were carried out, and the absolute paranoia spread by the mainstream media to keep the sheeple living in fear.

    I'm as happy as everyone else that nobody got killed.
     
    AGS, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  11. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #111
    Are you referring to the public or your friends?
     
    Toopac, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  12. N_F_S

    N_F_S Active Member

    Messages:
    2,475
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #112
    I already said, even if it was not Iraq and it was Kongo for example :) I would still be against any war conflicts, I'm against US & UK decisions, not supporting Iraq.
     
    N_F_S, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  13. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #113
    So you "don't give a sh*t" about the war in Iraq or the attempted bombings in London/Glasgow, yet you claim not to like the US & UK "decisions" regarding Iraq.

    You are also against "conflicts" & "war" but find the attempted bombings in London/Glasgow acceptable & understandable (even though you "don't give a sh*t") & you don't like the US & UK being in Iraq (even though you "don't give a sh*t" about Iraq)...

    Correct me if I'm wrong;)

    Personally i know you are having a hard time keeping up with what you preach & each time you type you expose yourself even more, if i didn't know better i would put you down as a closet muslim:)
     
    Toopac, Jul 3, 2007 IP
  14. N_F_S

    N_F_S Active Member

    Messages:
    2,475
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #114
    correcting you:

    who started first? YOU. So why would I like your decisions ?

    Nice try, maybe AGS muslim too ?:) MAybe the whole world who dont like US & UK decisions are muslims too, eh?
     
    N_F_S, Jul 4, 2007 IP
  15. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #115
    I have TWO PACK on permanent ignore because he's insane, so rarely get to see any of his posts, which is a blessing. :)
     
    AGS, Jul 4, 2007 IP
  16. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #116
    I like how you skip over everything, didn't you want to address anything in my last post?

    I'll answer you:

    Your not supposed to care, you should not like or dislike "my" decisions.

    I said "if i didn't know better i would put you down as a closet muslim" obviously i know your not (as you say your not)

    Maybe AGS is but it's not for me to say whether he is or not.

    Let's make this simpler for you:

    If you don't give a sh*t as you say about Iraq or the car bombs then why do you (someone who "doesn't care" try to justify one act & condemn another? answer this please.

    People that don't give a sh*t don't care at all:)

    Stay out of my thread you dirty kafer
     
    Toopac, Jul 4, 2007 IP
  17. N_F_S

    N_F_S Active Member

    Messages:
    2,475
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #117
    I don't like:

    1) aggression

    2) war (especially when it's 2 big powers hummering one weak one)

    3) war without any reasons (as the next day this war could be next to my door without any reasons)

    enough ?

    Why not send troops to North Korea, eh ? :) They are very bad according to Bush and they playing with nuclears, too. Answer me, would you vote to send your troops there if Bush asks you ? Answer is simple : no. Cos North Korea is much more powerful than any of the ones you fighthing with now.

    Don't beat a cat, when you are the dog (2 dogs actually :)), find another dog, then it will be a fair fight.
     
    N_F_S, Jul 5, 2007 IP
  18. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #118
    So you "do care" we are getting somewhere aren't we? you care about the US/UK invading Iraq, you care about the car bombs because they are justify as you point out.

    So simply put don't justify car bombs & say you don't care as a way of getting out of it, say exactly what you mean.

    "I justify these car bombs because i don't like what's going on in Iraq"
     
    Toopac, Jul 5, 2007 IP
  19. N_F_S

    N_F_S Active Member

    Messages:
    2,475
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #119
    yes, now you got me, I do care of fair attitude and I dont understand why UK needed this sh*t with no reasons behind it. I wouldnt care if US only was there alone, as I never go to US.

    I was saying that I dont give a damn on whats happening in Iraq/Iran/whoever else there, it's their own country, even if they hang all their ppl, thats their choice, but I dont like when someone goes there and tries to "fix" them. Now their actions are justified (blow ups, etc.)

    btw, have you seen the news ? All them who got arrested are from Middle East ;)
     
    N_F_S, Jul 5, 2007 IP
  20. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #120
    I thought so.

    Yes that was a huge shock, i thought all the long they were all "full on white British males":eek:
     
    Toopac, Jul 5, 2007 IP